Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

RAJABAI GANGARAM GADGEVsChandrakant Ramchandra Rokde

CNR MHCC01005005201828-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ORDER
Decision Date: 18th February 2019

TrustJury record updated 12 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100044/2011
Registration Date
27 Jan 2011

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec ASSIGNED

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 19-04-2018
    Business: Both parties and adv are absent.
    Matter is adj. to 09/07/2018 for appearance.
    Next Purpose: FOR APPERANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 09-07-2018
    
    Date: 09-07-2018
    Business: Both parties and their advocates are absent,
    Matter is adjd. to 30/08/2018 for Appearance.
    Next Purpose: FOR APPERANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 30-08-2018
    
    Date: 30-08-2018
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    None for Defendant
    Matter is adjd. to 17/10/2018 for Appearance.
    Next Purpose: FOR APPERANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 17-10-2018
    
    Date: 17-10-2018
    Business: None for D.H.
    None for J.D.
    Matter is adjd. to 29/11/2018 for Appearance.
    Next Purpose: FOR APPERANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2018
    
    Date: 29-11-2018
    Business: None for D.H.
    None for J.D.
    Matter is adjd. to 17/01/2019 for Appearance.
    Next Purpose: FOR APPERANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 17-01-2019
    
    Date: 17-01-2019
    Business: Adv. Chavan for D.H. present.
    None for J.D.
    Matter is adjd. to 18/02/2019 for Appearance.
    Next Purpose: FOR APPERANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 18-02-2019
    
    Date: 18-02-2019
    Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for Aplnt present.
    None for Respondent.
    Advocate for Aplnt has filed pursis, TOR.
    Read the M.A. no.62/18 and order of Registrar. It appears that excess amount which was laying in the office of Sheriff of Mumbai is order to be paid to the Aplnt. by NEFT or A/c payee cheque. Today the advocate for plaintiff has filed pursis to the effect that the Registrar has already passed the order in respect of the withdrawal of amount by defendant. Hence in view of the above position, the M.A. no.62/18 and Execution Apln. 44/11 are disposed of and they are removed from the board.
    Nature Of Disposal: ORDER
    Disposal Date: 18-02-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 105390/2018
    Filing Date: 27-01-2011
    First Hearing Date: 19th April 2018
    Decision Date: 18th February 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    18 Feb 2019
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: Back
    Daily Status
    IN THE COURT OF :COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
    Case No. :EXECUTION APPLN/0100044/2011
    Rajabai Gangaram Gadge Vs Chandrakant Ramchandra Rokde
    Date : 18-02-2019
    Business : Adv. Ramesh Jain for Aplnt present. None for Respondent.
    Advocate for Aplnt has filed pursis, TOR. Read the M.A.
    no.62/18 and order of Registrar. It appears that excess
    amount which was laying in the office of Sheriff of
    Mumbai is order to be paid to the Aplnt. by NEFT or A/c
    payee cheque. Today the advocate for plaintiff has filed
    pursis to the effect that the Registrar has already passed the
    order in respect of the withdrawal of amount by defendant.
    Hence in view of the above position, the M.A. no.62/18 and
    Execution Apln. 44/11 are disposed of and they are
    removed from the board.
    Nature of Disposal : ORDER
    Disposal Date : 18-02-2019
    COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    18 Feb 2019
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: Back
    Daily Status
    IN THE COURT OF :COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
    Case No. :EXECUTION APPLN/0100044/2011
    Rajabai Gangaram Gadge Vs Chandrakant Ramchandra Rokde
    Date : 18-02-2019
    Business : Adv. Ramesh Jain for Aplnt present. None for Respondent.
    Advocate for Aplnt has filed pursis, TOR. Read the M.A.
    no.62/18 and order of Registrar. It appears that excess
    amount which was laying in the office of Sheriff of
    Mumbai is order to be paid to the Aplnt. by NEFT or A/c
    payee cheque. Today the advocate for plaintiff has filed
    pursis to the effect that the Registrar has already passed the
    order in respect of the withdrawal of amount by defendant.
    Hence in view of the above position, the M.A. no.62/18 and
    Execution Apln. 44/11 are disposed of and they are
    removed from the board.
    Nature of Disposal : ORDER
    Disposal Date : 18-02-2019
    COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.