Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 09 Feb 2022 · CNR MHCC010049732019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010049732019 Filed on :04-05-2019 Registered On :19-06-2019 Decided on :9.02.2022 Duration : Y-02/M-09/D-07 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 626 OF 2019 Exhibit- 9 CNR NO.- MHCC010049732019 Shri Aman Jabarmal Chopra Age :27 years Occ: Business On behalf of his Proprietary Concern: “Aman Creation”, a. Having his place of business at Shop no. 17, Ground Floor, Angadiya Chowk, 15/17 , Ladwadi, Old Hanuman Lane , Kalbadevi, Mumbai- 400 002. b. Residing at 701, Building 25/B, Ashok Nagar, Kalyan Road, Bhiwandi, Dist: Thane – 421 302. ... Plaintiff V/s. Smt. Manisha Bharat Rathod Age : Adult, Occ: Business, On behlaf of her Proprietary concern: “M/s. Colours Creation” -- 1 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.626/2019 2 a. Having place of business at Room No.8, 1st Floor, Jaymahal, Opp. Piramal Chambers, Income Tax Office, Lal Baug, Mumbai-400 012. ... Defendant Appearance:- Mr. Shashikant Rathi Advocate for the plaintiff. Exparte against Defendants. CORAM : HER HONOUR AD-HOC JUDGE SMT. A.H. KASHIKAR CITY CIVIL COURT, GR. BOMBAY (C.R. NO.61). DATE : 09/2/2022 JUDGMENT (Dictated and pronounced in Open Court.) 1. This is a summary suit instituted by the plaintiff under order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 against the defendant. 2. The suit claim of the plaintiff is narrated in nutshell as under: The plaintiff is a businessman engaged in business of Sale of Garments, to be specific “ Kurtis” Retail Supplier. The defendant is engaged in the business of Sale of “ Kurti” in Retail Market in the name and style of “Colours Creation” . The transactions took place in between them in due course. By 22.10.2018, the total amount payable by the defendant against the garments sold to her stood at Rs.2,07,382/-. -- 2 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.626/2019 3 Defendant assured for repayment and issued two cheques at different times for pool payment. Cheque dt. 1.11.2018 bearing no. 335953 was for Rs.34,000/- and the cheque dtd. 10.11.2018 bearing no. 335954 was for Rs.20,000/-. Both cheques got dishonored for insufficiency of funds in defendant’s bank account. 3. The plaintiff issued letter/notice through advocate on 26.12.2018 to the defendant calling upon him to pay the amount of Rs.2,07,382/- alongwith accrued interest but the defendant failed to comply with said requisition. Lateron the defendant acknowledged her liability and sent her son at plaintiff's business place on dtd.30.1.2019 to return some goods sold to defendant amounting of Rs.20,388/- and assured for remaining repayment. The outstanding dues remained Rs.1,86,994/- . However, defendant miserably failed to make payment of said outstanding dues which come to Rs.2,10,841/-. The plaintiff averred that the defendant is liable to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.2,10,841/- with further interest. 3. Thus, the plaintiff has filed the present suit against the defendant for recovery. It is averred that the defendant is liable to pay a sum of Rs.2,10,841/- to the plaintiff and further interest at the rate of 24% p.a on the principal amount from the date of suit till its realization. Hence, this suit. 4. The suit summons were duly served on the defendant but she failed to appear and contest the suit. Hence, suit is posted for judgment as per order XXXVII Rule 2(3) of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 judgment. -- 3 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.626/2019 4 5. The following points arise for my determination and my findings thereon are as under for the reasons stated there under:- Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS. 1. Whether the plaintiff entitled for recovery of amount against the defendant ? A] If yes, what would be the rate of interest? Amount of Rs.2,10,841/- with interest @ 24% per annum on the principal amount 2. What order and decree? As per final order. REASONS 6. In order to establish the suit claim, the plaintiff has filed following documentary evidence below Exh.03 i.e the list of documents: Sr. No. Description of documents Exhibits 1 Cheque bearing No. 284913 dtd.15.06.2018 and original cheque return memo. Exh. 4 Colly 2 Original triplicate of the invoice bearing invoice no.82,133 and 111. Exh. 5 Colly 3 Original triplicate of the invoice bearing invoice no.154 Exh. 6 4 Cheque bearing no. 335953 dtd. 1.11.2018, Original cheque return memo dtd.3.11.2018, Cheque bearing no. 335954 dtd. 10.11.2018, Original cheque return memo dtd. 15.11.2018 Exh. 7 colly 5 Office copy of the legal notice sent by advocate dtd. 26.12.2018 and Exh.8 Colly -- 4 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.626/2019 5 Sr. No. Description of documents Exhibits RPAD Envelop bearing the postal endorsement “ Intimation on 28.12.2018” which was served unserved upon defendant. AS TO POINT NO.1: 7. This is a summary suit which is not contested by the defendant. The documents produced on record by the plaintiff shows that the defendant incurred liability for payment against goods sold to her by plaintiff as per the invoices so raised and issued the 2 cheques to the plaintiff for the amount of Rs.34,000/- and Rs,20,000/- respectively. Said cheques came to be dishonored for insufficiency of funds. The outstanding due is Rs.1,86,994/- and said amount is not paid by the defendant to the plaintiff. Further, it reveals from the record that said transaction for issuance of cheque took place on dtd. 01.11.2018 and 10.11.2018, the notice/letter of demand was issued to the defendant on dtd.26.12.2018 goods worth of Rs.20,380/- returned on dtd. 30.1.2019 and the suit is filed on 04.05.2019. As such, the plaintiff’s claim in the suit is well within limitation. 8. All the documents produced by the plaintiff at list Exhibit- 03 goes to establish that the defendant is under the liability to pay outstanding amount of Rs.1,86,994/- to the plaintiff and the cheques issued for part payment got dishonored. The legal liability is not discharged by the defendant. Therefore, the plaintiff is claiming Rs.2,10,841/- which is the amount calculated with interest at the rate of 24% p.m from the date of dishonor of cheque till the filing of suit. Said -- 5 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.626/2019 6 amount is not repaid by the defendant. Therefore, the defendant is liable to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.2,10,841/- to the plaintiff. In this background, I have arrived at the conclusion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover sum of Rs.2,10,841/- from the defendant. 9. According to the plaintiff the outstanding dues against the defendant is Rs.2,10,841/- and said amount is calculated alongwith with interest at the rate of 24% p.m from the of dishonor of cheque till the filing of suit. Apart from said amount which is due against the defendant on the date of filing of the suit, the plaintiff has claimed further interest at the rate of 24% per annum on the principal amount. The defendant neither appeared nor contested the suit. There is nothing on record to show that the said translations between the parties was not the commercial transactions. The invoices shows that agreed rate of interest is 24% p.a. Therefore, I hold the plaintiff is entitled to recover the principal amount alongwith interest at the rate of 24% p.a. till realization of the amount. Therefore, I hold, the rate of interest at the rate of 24% per annum would be just and proper to be awarded on the principal sum of Rs.1,86,994/-. Hence, point no.1 is answer in the affirmative. AS TO POINT NO.2: 10. In view of discussion and finding on point no.1, it is held that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.2,10,841/- from the defendant with interest at the rate of 24% per annum on the principal sum of Rs.1,86,994/- from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover cost of the suit from the defendant. Hence, in answer to point no.2, I proceed to pass the following order. -- 6 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.626/2019 7 ORDER 1. The defendant shall pay Rs.2,10,841/-(Rs. Two Lacs Ten Thousand Eight Hundred Forty one Only) to the plaintiff, with interest at the rate of 24% per annum on the principal sum of Rs.1,86,994/- from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. 2. The defendant do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff. 3. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per the rules. 4. Decree be drawn accordingly. (A.H. Kashikar) AD-HOC Judge, City Civil Court, Date :09/02/2022 Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 09..02.2022 Typed on : 09..02.2022 Signed on : 09..02.2022 -- 7 of 8 -- Summ. Suit No.626/2019 8 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 09/02/2022 4.00p .m. ( K.M. Rana ) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Smt. A.H. Kashikar (C.R.No.61) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 09/02/2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 09/02/2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 09/02/2022 -- 8 of 8 --
