Full Order Text
Order 1 · 14 Jun 2018 · CNR MHCC010049262018
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT FORT GREATER BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1590 OF 2018 IN SUIT NO. 225 OF 2010 Cdr. Kehar Singh VSM IN (Retd) .. .. Plaintiff Versus Mumbai Hockey Association Ltd. & Ors. .. .. Defendants Advocate for the Plaintiff present. Mr. Pritesh Rajgor Advocate for the Defendants. Coram : His Honour Judge Shri. G. O. Agrawal CR no. : 13 Dated : 14.6.2018 Oral Order: The notice of motion has been taken out by the defendant no.1 for recalling of no cross examination order passed on 16.3.2018. Heard learned Counsel for the defendant no.1 and plaintiff. 2. Learned Counsel for the defendant no.1 has urged that previously the matter was handled by some other advocate who could not attend the matter on due date and the no cross examination by defendant no.1 order was passed. The defendant no.1 is ready to conduct the cross examination. The defendant no.1 should not suffer for the default of its earlier advocate. 3. The defendant no.1 appears to be a pubic limited company. It is obvious that appropriate instructions are -- 1 of 3 -- 2 necessary from the authorized persons to the Counsel. No cross order is fatal to the defendant no.1's case. No one should be condemned unheard. The suit is of the year 2010. For the purpose of effective adjudication of the suit, I am of the opinion that it will be just and proper to afford an opportunity to the defendant no.1 to conduct the cross examination of plaintiff's witness. The reasons for the absence for learned Counsel on behalf of the defendant no.1 appear plausible. I take justice oriented approach and allow the notice of motion by imposing costs upon the defendant no.1. In the result, following order is passed: ORDER 1. The Notice of Motion no. 1590 of 2018 is allowed with costs. 2. The no cross examination order dated 16.3.2018 is hereby recalled. 3. The defendant no. 1 is allowed to conduct cross examination of the plaintiff's witness subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/ payable by defendant no.1 to the plaintiff. Dated :14.6.2018 (G. O. Agrawal) Judge City Civil Court Gr. Mumbai -- 2 of 3 -- 3 (As per office circular no.25 of 2016 and 20 of 2016, dated 20.12.2016 issued by IC Registrar) “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT, COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” DATE & TIME OF UPLOADING NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : BHARATKUMAR NUKTE 14.6.2018 6.00 pm Name of Steno with Post. : Bharatkumar Nukte, Stenographer (HG) Name of the Judge (with Court no.) : HHJ Shri. G. O. Agrawal (CR no. 23) Date of pronouncement of Judgment : 14.6.2018 Judgment signed by the P.O. on : 14.6.2018 Judgment uploaded on : 14.6.2018 -- 3 of 3 --
