Full Order Text
Order 1 · 04 Sept 2018 · CNR MHCC010049212018
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1586 OF 2018 CNR MHCC010049212018 IN S.C.SUIT NO.1444 OF 2014 CNR MHCC010053912014 Kishor Mansatta & Anr. )....Plaintiff. V/s. Shri. Cutchi Lohana Mahajan & Ors. )...Defendants. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. KISHORE M.JAISWAL (C.R. NO.02) DATE : 04/09/2018 Adv.Akshar Laws for the defendants Adv. Mukesh V. Aiya for the plaintiff ORAL ORDER This notice of motion is taken out by defendants no. 1 to 3, 5 and 6 for condoning the delay and filing written statement on record. It is supported by an affidavit being executed defendant no.2 Mr. Vasantkumar Nathubhai Manek. The plaintiff by filing reply on affidavit being executed by the plaintiff no.1 Shri Culchi Lohana Mahajan has strongly opposed the notice of motion. 2. Heard learned advocates of both the sides. 3. At the very outset of the present case, learned advocate for the defendants made a statement at bar that the written statement of -- 1 of 4 -- 2 defendants no.1 to 3 , 5 and 6 are ready in all respects and could be file on record today itself. Considering this submission, I have gone through the reasons as mentioned in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion. The main dispute is between the trust and the defendant and the main prayer in the suit is for declaration regarding of the resolution. Defendants no.1 to 3, 5 and 6 are the trustees of the trust who intends to contest the suit on merits. It is submitted that several matters before different authorities are pending between the same parties. So also some chamber summons and notice of motion was pending in this matter. The learned advocate for the defendant has drawn may attention to the order dated 18th December 2017 passed by my learned predecessor which reads as under “ “Order: It is settled position that appearance of the advocate of the defendant in Notice of Motion is to be treated as appearance in the suit . In case the advocate of plaintiff is able to prove service of the defendant on next date.” The advocate for the plaintiff submitted that the writ of summons is not served in the present case. May that, as it be, this matter is of the year 2014 and the records shows that from time to time the matter was adjourned either for the notice of motion hearing or the preliminary issues or for the hearing on chamber summons. The records also reflects that the defendants no.1 to 3, 5 and 6 were regularly been represented and only the written statement remains to be placed on record. In my considered opinion, the reasons as envisaged in paragraphs 4 to 14 in the affidavit in support of notice of motion are the genuine reasons for which the delay in filing written statement can very well be condoned. Even otherwise, considering the nature of the suit and for giving fair opportunity to defendants to contest it on merits , I am of the opinion that they may be permitted to -- 2 of 4 -- 3 file the written statement on record. Under the given circumstances, certain costs also needs to be imposed upon the defendants before allowing them to file written statement on record. Considering over all circumstances, I pass the following order. ORDER 1. Notice of motion no. 1586/18 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to the conditions that defendant shall pay the cost of Rs.2000/ to the District Legal Services Authority , Mumbai within two weeks and with further direction that the defendant shall placed the copy of written statement on record today itself. 2. It is made it clear that the written statement will be exhibited only after payment of costs. 3. Notice of motion is disposed of accordingly. (Kishore M. Jaiswal ) Addl. Sessions Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Greater Mumbai. Date:04/09/2018 Dictated on : 04/09/2018 Transcribed on : 06/09/2018 Signed on : -- 3 of 4 -- 4 “Certified to be True And Correct copy of the Original. Signed Judgment/Order.” Upload Date 10/09/2018 Time at 11.35 a.m. Name of Stenographer (Mrs. V.V.Mhatre) Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) H.H.J Shri Kishore M. Jaiswal (C.R. No.02) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT / ORDER 04/09/2018 JUDGMENT / ORDER signed by P.O.on 06/09/2018 JUDGMENT / ORDER uploaded on 10/09/2018 -- 4 of 4 --
