Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Tushar Chandrakant Wadekar +1 moreVsRajeev Sitaram Rane

CNR MHCC01004912201959-Court 59 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 20 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102883/2022
Registration Date
19 Dec 2022
Next Hearing Date
11 Jan 2027
Case Stage
REPORT

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Petitioner

    1. 1Tushar Chandrakant Wadekar
    2. 2Pranali Tushar Wadekar

    Respondent

    1. 1Rajeev Sitaram Rane

    Acts & Sections

    1
    CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec 19

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 01-11-2022

Date: 20-06-2026
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2026

Date: 20-06-2026
Business: CORAM - H.H.J. SMT. P. M. KATHARE-(C.R.NO.59)
Adv. Nazia Rehman Shaikh h/f Adv.Ashish Shrikant Naik for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Issue notice to the defendant regarding restoration of suit and transfer of the suit to Cr.No.59 through court motion.
Matter is adj to 11/09/2026 for report.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 11-09-2026

Date: 11-09-2026
Business: CORAM - H.H.J. SMT. P. M. KATHARE-(C.R.NO.59)
Adv.Nivedi Pasad i/b Adv.Ashish Naik for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Matter is adj to 11/01/2027 for awaiting report.
Next Purpose: REPORT
Next Hearing Date: 11-01-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 105393/2019
Filing Date: 03-05-2019
Court Number And Judge: 59-Court 59 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Interim Order 1
    01 Nov 2022
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 01/11/2022
St. No.
5393/19
SU 2883/22
CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI V.D. KEDAR, JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT,
GR.MUMBAI (C. R. NO. 01)
None present for plaintiff.
Till date the plaintiff failed to remove office objection. Already notice
to that effect is displayed on board and thereby directed the plaintiff
to remove the office objection. However the plaintiff failed to do so. It
reveals that the plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the matter.
Hence it stands disposed off. Suit be registered for statistical purpose.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    01 Nov 2022
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 01/11/2022
St. No.
5393/19
SU 2883/22
CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI V.D. KEDAR, JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT,
GR.MUMBAI (C. R. NO. 01)
None present for plaintiff.
Till date the plaintiff failed to remove office objection. Already notice
to that effect is displayed on board and thereby directed the plaintiff
to remove the office objection. However the plaintiff failed to do so. It
reveals that the plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the matter.
Hence it stands disposed off. Suit be registered for statistical purpose.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.