SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Mr. Prakash Kisan DashetyeVsMr. Prashant Kisan Dashetye +2 more
CNR MHCC0100487220193-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--CONSENT DECREE
Decision Date: 17th January 2022
TrustJury record updated 20 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 101587/2019
- Registration Date
- 24 Jun 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
4Acts & Sections
1Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34 · 37
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 08-07-2019 Business: By precipee NOB TOB Adv.Ms. Smita Salve for plaintiff present and filed application for extension of time to serve the writ of summons. Application for extension of time. Heard. Application is allowed. Time extended by three weeks till 29.07.2019 for serving writ of summons. Matter stands Adj for to 15.7.2019 Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS Next Hearing Date: 15-07-2019 Date: 15-07-2019 Business: Adv. Smita Salave for plaintiff present and submitted she wants further extension of time to serve the writ of summons. Time is already extended till 29.07.19. Matter stands Adj for return of writ of summons on 29.07.19. Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS Next Hearing Date: 29-07-2019 Date: 29-07-2019 Business: Adv. Jafari for plaintiff present and filed affidavit of service of writ of summons. None present for defendant. Matter stands Adj for WS to 23.09.19. Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2019 Date: 23-09-2019 Business: Adv. Jafari for plaintiff present. Adv. for Defendant present. Matter stands Adj for Written Statement to 18.11.19. Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT Next Hearing Date: 18-11-2019 Date: 18-11-2019 Business: Adv. Rakesh Kamble h/f Adv Jafrin for plaintiff present. Adv. Tanbaji Jadhav for defendant no.1 present. W/S filed by adv. for deft.no.1. t.o.r. Copy is served to other side. Heard both sides. Perused the record, as per evidence affd. filed by plff. on 29.07.2019, the deft.nos.2 and 3 have been served with Wr/sum on 22.07.2019 but they are absent. Hence, suit to proceed exparte against them. It appears that it is a suit for partition. So the dispute between the parties is family dispute. Therefore, Ld. Counsel for the both sides are informed that they can get instructions from their client for the possibility of the settlement, if any, by next date. Matter stands Adj for settlement / framing issues on 15.01.2020. L.O. at 04.35 p.m. Adv. Jafrin for the plff. present and submitted that as per affd. of service the D/1 was served on 22.07.2019. Therefore, W/s filed by D/1 today, is beyond 90 days. Hence, plff. has objection for taking W/S of D/1 on record. In view of the above, keep the matter for hearing on objection of plff. on next date. Matter stands Adj for settlement / framing issues on 15.01.2020. Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2020 Date: 15-01-2020 Business: None present for plaintiff. Defendant no. 1 present. Adv. R. K. Mendalkar for defendant no. 1 present. Mr. Sunil Babu Ghadigaonkar, representative of defendant no. 2 present and filed letter addressed to registrar City Civil Court, Mumbai dated 01.12.2019 informing the court about the factual position in respect of suit flat along with copy of share certificate and extract of proceeding. Letter addressed to registrar City Civil Court, Mumbai dated 01.12.2019 on behalf of defendant no. 2. TOR. Ld. counsel for defendant no. 1 submitted that the matter is between the two brothers and suit is for partition. As per averments para 18 and prayer clause (d) of the plaint, plaintiff is claiming 1/5th share in the suit premises. The defendant no.1 is ready to pay him the 1/5th share as per valuation of suit claim that come to Rs. 6,00,000/-. Hence, it was submitted that time may be granted to settle the matter in above terms. Matter stands Adj for settlement to 05.02.2020. Later on Adv. Jafari for plaintiff present. Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 05-02-2020 Date: 05-02-2020 Business: Adv. Jafari for plaintiff present. Adv. R. K. Mendadkar for defendant present. Ld. counsel for plaintiff submitted that the proposal for settlement given by defendant no. 1 is under consideration of plaintiff and sought adjournment. Adjournment granted. Matter stands Adj for settlement to 28.02.2020. Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2020 Date: 28-02-2020 Business: Court is busy in dictating Judgement in Commercial suit no. 98/19. Hence, board is discharged. Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 21-03-2020 Date: 21-03-2020 Business: There is no urgency in matter. As per directions of office order no. 66 of 2020 r/w notification dated 14.03.2020, board is discharged. Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 22-06-2020 Date: 22-06-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2020 Date: 13-08-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2020 Date: 07-10-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 17-10-2020 Date: 17-10-2020 Business: None present for plaintiff and defendant. Matter stands adjn for settlement to 27.11.2020. Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 27-11-2020 Date: 27-11-2020 Business: None present for plaintiff and defendant. Court is busy in hearing other urgent matter. Matter stands Adj for Settlement to 05.01.2021 Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 02-12-2020 Date: 02-12-2020 Business: Not on Board Taken on Board. Perused the record. The suit is at pre-trial stage. I find that there is an element of compromise. Matter can be referred to ADR for settlement. Hence, issue notice to parties for referring the matter to Lok Adalat on 12.12.2020. Matter already Adj to 05.01.2021. Next Purpose: SETTLEMENT Next Hearing Date: 05-01-2021 Date: 05-01-2021 Business: Advocate Noman Jafri for plaintiff present. Advocate Ms. Komal Gaikwad for defendant no.1 present. It appears that the case is pending for settlement since long. However, due to the nationwide lockdown imposed, the parties could not discuss the settlement. The matter was referred to the Lok-Adalat but the plaintiff did not turn up. Looking to the nature of dispute there is certainly an element of settlement. Therefore the matter is a suitable case for referring to mediation. In view of this, the mater is referred for mediation. The case is adjourned to 06.02.2021 for Mediation report. Next Purpose: MEDIATION REPORT Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2021 Date: 06-02-2021 Business: None present. The case is adjourned to 20.03.2021 for Mediation report. LO at 12.33pm Advocate Jafri h/f adv. Noman Jafri for plaintiff present. Defendant present. Already the case is adjourned to 20.03.2021 for Mediation report. Next Purpose: MEDIATION REPORT Next Hearing Date: 20-03-2021 Date: 20-03-2021 Business: The case is adjourned to 17.04.2021 for framing issues. Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2021 Date: 17-04-2021 Business: Declared holiday as per Office Order 81 of 2021 Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 08-07-2021 Date: 08-07-2021 Business: Court is vacant Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 06-09-2021 Date: 06-09-2021 Business: Matter called out at 04.04 p.m. None present. Matter stands adjourned to 20.12.2021 for issues. Later on at 04.55 p.m. Adv. Noman Jafri for plaintiff present. Matter already stands adjourned to 20.12.2021 Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES Next Hearing Date: 20-12-2021 Date: 20-12-2021 Business: Adv. Noman Jafri for plaintiff present. Adv. Komal Gaikwad for Defendant present. It appears that, my predecessor on 20/03/2021 did not accept the consent terms as those were executed in the absence of two sisters. Parties are directed to obtain the consent of the sisters and produce them before the court. Matter stands adjourned to 17/01/2022 for compliance/steps. Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 17-01-2022 Date: 17-01-2022 Business: Matter called out at 11.44 a.m. Plaintiff in person present. Adv. Noman Jafri for plaintiff present. Adv. T. V. Jadhav for defendant present. The matter was already settled in Mediation. Today, the sister of plaintiff i.e. Kum. Priya Alias Reshma and Kum. Pallavi @ Pallavi Prashant Varange filed their consent to the settlement. Their consent affidavit is TOR. Exh.6. Deft. No.1 paid draft of Rs.11,00,000/- to the plaintiff in the court. In view of, matter is settled. Following order is passed. 1. In view of consent terms, decree be drawn up. 2. Necessary court fees be refunded as per rules. 3. Suit disposed of as settled. Nature Of Disposal: CONSENT DECREE Disposal Date: 17-01-2022
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 105410/2019 Filing Date: 03-05-2019 First Hearing Date: 08th July 2019 Decision Date: 17th January 2022 Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 117 Jan 2022
17 Jan 2022
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 17.01.2022 Sr. No. 44 SU 1587/19 Exh.6 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI.A.H.LADDHAD (C.R. 03) Matter called out at 11.44 a.m. Plaintiff in person present. Adv. Noman Jafri for plaintiff present. Adv. T. V. Jadhav for defendant present. The matter was already settled in Mediation. Today, the sister of plaintiff i.e. Kum. Priya Alias Reshma and Kum. Pallavi @ Pallavi Prashant Varange filed their consent to the settlement. Their consent affidavit is TOR. Exh.6. Deft. No.1 paid draft of Rs.11,00,000/ to the plaintiff in the court. In view of, matter is settled. Following order is passed. 1. In view of consent terms, decree be drawn up. 2. Necessary court fees be refunded as per rules. 3. Suit disposed of as settled. Judge -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
