Mrs. Trupti W/o. Nilesh MayekarVsMr. Sharat S. Mayekar +1 more

Date: 21-06-2018
Business: Adv.Mr.Ravindra Singh for Plff.present.
Adv.Mr.Chouhan h/f Adv.Mr.Lanke for Deft.no.1 present.
Adv.for Deft.is directed to tender registered N/m No.1536/18 on next date.
On request of Ld advocates of both the sides adjd.for N/m hearing on 26.09.2018.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-09-2018

Date: 26-09-2018
Business: H.H.J.is nominated as a Trainer for Mediation hence, board is discharged.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-11-2018

Date: 27-11-2018
Business: HHJ is Nominated as trainer for training on mediation hence today Board is discharged.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 30-11-2018

Date: 30-11-2018
Business: Adv. Ms. Narvekar for plaintiff present and filed two affidavits in NM No. 3566/2016. She also tendered original chamber summons no. 1406/2018 alongwith affidavit. Adv. Karan Chavan for defendant present. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that the matter is urgent and the notice of motion be heard for ad-interim relief.
Heard Ld. Counsel for plaintiff in NM No. 3566/2016 and CS NO. 1406/2018 partly. D-1 has expired on 30.5.2018 and suit has already abated against him. The proposed LRs of deceased D-1 have not been served with the CS and NM. It is necessary to grant opportunity of hearing and filing reply to the LRs before the chamber summons or notice of motion can be considered.  Plaintiff is not the LR of D-1. Hence, I find that there is no urgency in this matter. The proposed action apprehended in the notice of motion is only in respect of change in the record of the society.  The plaintiff is directed to serve the proposed LRs with the CS and NM.
Matter already adj. to 28.01.2019.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2019

Date: 28-01-2019
Business: Adv. Narvekar for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Chavan for Defendant no.1 present.
Resp.no.1 present.
Copy given to Resp.no.1.
Plf is directed to take steps for service of notice upon rest of resp. through bailiff and reply of Resp.no.1.
Adj for reply to 16.03.2019.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 16-03-2019

Date: 16-03-2019
Business: Adv. Neha Pandey for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Karan Chavan for Resp. no.1 present.
Plff  tendered registered Ch/s no.1406/18 t.o.r.
Adv Chavan for Resp.no.1 sought time to file reply.
Time granted.
Adj for Ch/s reply to 29.04.2019.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 29-04-2019

Date: 29-04-2019
Business: As holiday was declared on 29/04/2019, on account of Loksabha election, matter is taken on today''s board and adjourned
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 02-07-2019

Date: 02-07-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2019

Date: 20-09-2019
Business: Advocate Singh for Plaintiff present
Advocate Nadar h/f Adv. S. S. Lanke for LRs of Defendant no.1 present and filed vakalatnama for respondents no.1 to 3, t.o.r. and marked as Exh.3.  He also filed reply to Chamber Summons no.1406/18, t.o.r.
Advocate for Plaintiff filed draft Chamber Summons with affidavit in support of Chamber Summons.  Leave to register Chamber Summons is granted.  Copy of draft Chamber Summons is served upon advocate Mr. Nadar.
Case is adjourned to 22/10/2019 for hearing of Chamber Summons no.1406/18.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 22-10-2019

Date: 22-10-2019
Business: Advocate Sana Khan for Plaintiff present filed registered Chamber Summons no.1889/2019 with affidavit in support, t.o.r.   She also filed rejoinder to the reply filed by Defendant in Notice of Motion no.1406/18, t.o.r.
Adv Nadar for Defendant no.1 and proposed Defendants present
Case is adjourned to 15/01/2020 for reply of Chamber Summons no.1889/19 and hearing of Notice of Motion no.1406/18.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2020

Date: 15-01-2020
Business: Advocate Mr. Ravindra Singh for Plaintiff present
Advocate Mr. Amit Chhoda for Defendant present and sought adjournment for NM and Chamber Summons hearing.  Considering submissions adjourned.
Case is adjourned to 18/03/2020 for NM and Chamber Summons hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 18-03-2020

Date: 18-03-2020
Business: Adv. Neha pandey present for Plaintiff.
Adv. Nadar present for Defendant No.1
In view of circular of Hon\''ble Principal Judge in respect of Corona Virus, only urgent matters are to be heard.
Case is adjourned to 19/06/2020 for C/S hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 19-06-2020

Date: 19-06-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2020

Date: 19-06-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2020

Date: 19-06-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2020

Date: 19-06-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2020

Date: 19-06-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2020

Date: 17-08-2020
Business: Adjourned due to Covid -19.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 06-10-2020

Date: 06-10-2020
Business: NOB TOB
Plaintiff with his Adv.Saraogi present.
None present for defendants.
Plaintiff\''s advocate filed precipe and submitted that the precipe is served upon otherside.  It seems that defendants/ respondents are unable to attend the Court inspite of service of precipe due to Corona Pandemic, hence for giving fair opportunity to defendants/ respondents matter is adjd. for chamber summons hearing to 14/10/2020.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-10-2020

Date: 14-10-2020
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 22-10-2020

Date: 22-10-2020
Business: Adv. Mr. A.M. Saraogi @ plaintiff present.
None present for defendants.
Matter is adjd to 26/10/2020 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-10-2020

Date: 22-10-2020
Business: Adv. Mr. A.M. Saraogi @ plaintiff present.
None present for defendants.
Matter is adjd to 26/10/2020 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-10-2020

Date: 22-10-2020
Business: Adv. Mr. A.M. Saraogi @ plaintiff present.
None present for defendants.
Matter is adjd to 26/10/2020 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-10-2020

Date: 22-10-2020
Business: Adv. Mr. A.M. Saraogi @ plaintiff present.
None present for defendants.
Matter is adjd to 26/10/2020 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-10-2020

Date: 22-10-2020
Business: Adv. Mr. A.M. Saraogi @ plaintiff present.
None present for defendants.
Matter is adjd to 26/10/2020 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-10-2020

Date: 22-10-2020
Business: Adv. Mr. A.M. Saraogi @ plaintiff present.
None present for defendants.
Matter is adjd to 26/10/2020 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-10-2020

Date: 22-10-2020
Business: Adv. Mr. A.M. Saraogi @ plaintiff present.
None present for defendants.
Matter is adjd to 26/10/2020 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-10-2020

Date: 26-10-2020
Business: Advocate Mr. Priyatosh Tiwari h/f adv. A. M. Saroagi @ plaintiff present and submitted that advocate Mr. Saroagi is held up in Court Room no.12, hence matter may be adjourned and if advocate Mr. Saroagi is unable to argue the matter on next date, the matter will be kept after Diwali vacation.
Advocate Mr. Jitendra Gautam h/f Adv. S. S. Lanke for defendant no.1 and strongly opposed for adjournment.
Considering submissions, case is adjourned by consent to 06/11/2020 at 12 noon with the direction to advocate for plaintiff to argue matter on next date.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 06-11-2020

Date: 06-11-2020
Business: Adv. A.M. Saraogi present for Plaintiffs.
Adv. S.S. Lanke for defendant no.1 present.
Heard plaintiffs adv. and respondents adv. about Chamber summons. Nos.2031/16,  1406/18 and 1889/2019.
ORDER IN CH/SUMMONS NO.2031/2016
Plaintiffs adv. Mr.Saraogi submitted that in the pendancy of the suit original defendant no.1 has executed gift deed of suit property in favour of Sachin Sharad Mayekar, the son of original defendant no.1. Therefore, Chamber summons is necessary to made absolute as original defendant no.1 has created third party right in respect of suit property in favour of respondent no.1.
Plaintiffs adv. also referred the affidavit filed in support of Chamber summons and the affidavit of reply filed by respondent. In said reply original defendant no.1 had filed the reply and  challenged the prayers made in Chamber summons.  It is submitted that original defendant no.1 is no more.
Respondent adv. Mr.Lanke submitted that respondent no.1 had taken out Notice of Motion U/s.9A of CPC for challenging the jurisdiction of this court and therefore unless respondent is made party to the suit said Notice of Motion cannot be heard. Therefore, according to Adv.Lanke, chamber summons may be allowed.
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, Chamber summons no.2031/2016 is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
Order in Chamber summons no.1406/2018.
This chamber summons is taken out by plaintiff for amendment in the plaint to bring Lrs of original defendant no.1 on record, who died on 30/05/2018.  This Chamber summons is filed in the court on 22/06/2018.   Respondent no.1 Nilesh Sharad Mayekar has filed affidavit in reply and resisted the prayers made in Chamber summons.
Heard Adv. Mr.Saraogi for plaintiff and adv. Lanke for respondent no.1 of Chamber summons No.2031/2016.
Both the ld. Advs pointed out that original defendant no.1 Sharat Mayekar has taken out Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 by which respondent  no.1 has challenged the jurisdiction of U/s.9A of CPC.  Now original defendant no.1 is no more, hence, according to both advocates, Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 is necessary to be disposed None present for Plaintiffs.
None present for Defendants.
It seems that due to Corona pandemic, parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 08.02.2021off as respondent Nilesh Mayekar will take out fresh Notice of Motion claiming same relief and therefore, according to both the ld. advs. Chamber summons no.1406/2018 is necessary to be made absolute so that Lrs of original defendant will come on record.
Considering submissions made on behalf of the parties Chamber summon Nos.1406/2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a).
Plaintiff is directed to carry out necessary amendment in plaint within stipulated time provided by law and to serve copy of amended plaint upon proposed defendants as well as defendant no.2.
ORDER IN Notice of Motion NO.2041/2017
This NM is taken out by original defendant Mr.Sharat Mayekar U/s.9A of CPC for challenging the jurisdiction of this Court for entertaining this suit. Plaintiff had filed affidavit of reply to said Notice of Motion.
It is pointed out that in the pendancy of Notice of Motion original defendant no.1 Mr.Sharat Mayekar expired on 30/05/2018 and Chamber summons for bringing on record his Lrs is already filed by plaintiff.  Hence now Notice of Motion 2041/2017 has income infructuous. Hence I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 stands disposed off as it has become infructuous due to death of original defendant no.1 Sharat Mayekar.
ORDER IN CH/S NO.1889/2019
This chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiff for amendment in the plaint to bring on record the fact that defendant no.2 Society has issued Share certificate in respect of suit property in favour of Nilesh Mayekar, the proposed defendant, and said share certificate is issued on the basis of Gift Deed executed by original defendant no.1 Mr.Sharat Mayekar in favour of proposed defendant Mr.Nilesh Mayekar.
Heard adv. Mr.Saraogi for plaintiff and adv. Mr.Lanke is appearing for Mr.Nilesh Mayekar who is respondent  in Chamber Summons No.1406/2018.
Plaintiffs adv. has pointed that original defendant is no more and no reply to this Chamber summons is filed by defendant no.2 Society.
Considering the fact that in the pendancy of this suit share certificate of suit property is issued by defendant no.2 in favour of Mr.Nilesh Mayekar, I find that amendment in the plaint is necessary for the proper decision of the suit.
Further proposed amendment is not going to cause prejudice to defendant no.2. Hence, I find that Chamber summons is necessary to be made absolute. Hence, I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Chamber summons No.1889/2019 is made absolute in terms of prayers of prayer clause(a).
Plaintiff is directed to carry out necessary amendment in plaint within stipulated time provided by law and to serve copy of amended plaint upon proposed defendants as well as defendant no.2.
Matter is adjd. for amendment in the plaint an filing affidavit of service by plaintiff etc. to 03/12/2020.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2020

Date: 06-11-2020
Business: Adv. A.M. Saraogi present for Plaintiffs.
Adv. S.S. Lanke for defendant no.1 present.
Heard plaintiffs adv. and respondents adv. about Chamber summons. Nos.2031/16,  1406/18 and 1889/2019.
ORDER IN CH/SUMMONS NO.2031/2016
Plaintiffs adv. Mr.Saraogi submitted that in the pendancy of the suit original defendant no.1 has executed gift deed of suit property in favour of Sachin Sharad Mayekar, the son of original defendant no.1. Therefore, Chamber summons is necessary to made absolute as original defendant no.1 has created third party right in respect of suit property in favour of respondent no.1.
Plaintiffs adv. also referred the affidavit filed in support of Chamber summons and the affidavit of reply filed by respondent. In said reply original defendant no.1 had filed the reply and  challenged the prayers made in Chamber summons.  It is submitted that original defendant no.1 is no more.
Respondent adv. Mr.Lanke submitted that respondent no.1 had taken out Notice of Motion U/s.9A of CPC for challenging the jurisdiction of this court and therefore unless respondent is made party to the suit said Notice of Motion cannot be heard. Therefore, according to Adv.Lanke, chamber summons may be allowed.
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, Chamber summons no.2031/2016 is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
Order in Chamber summons no.1406/2018.
This chamber summons is taken out by plaintiff for amendment in the plaint to bring Lrs of original defendant no.1 on record, who died on 30/05/2018.  This Chamber summons is filed in the court on 22/06/2018.   Respondent no.1 Nilesh Sharad Mayekar has filed affidavit in reply and resisted the prayers made in Chamber summons.
Heard Adv. Mr.Saraogi for plaintiff and adv. Lanke for respondent no.1 of Chamber summons No.2031/2016.
Both the ld. Advs pointed out that original defendant no.1 Sharat Mayekar has taken out Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 by which respondent  no.1 has challenged the jurisdiction of U/s.9A of CPC.  Now original defendant no.1 is no more, hence, according to both advocates, Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 is necessary to be disposed None present for Plaintiffs.
None present for Defendants.
It seems that due to Corona pandemic, parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 08.02.2021off as respondent Nilesh Mayekar will take out fresh Notice of Motion claiming same relief and therefore, according to both the ld. advs. Chamber summons no.1406/2018 is necessary to be made absolute so that Lrs of original defendant will come on record.
Considering submissions made on behalf of the parties Chamber summon Nos.1406/2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a).
Plaintiff is directed to carry out necessary amendment in plaint within stipulated time provided by law and to serve copy of amended plaint upon proposed defendants as well as defendant no.2.
ORDER IN Notice of Motion NO.2041/2017
This NM is taken out by original defendant Mr.Sharat Mayekar U/s.9A of CPC for challenging the jurisdiction of this Court for entertaining this suit. Plaintiff had filed affidavit of reply to said Notice of Motion.
It is pointed out that in the pendancy of Notice of Motion original defendant no.1 Mr.Sharat Mayekar expired on 30/05/2018 and Chamber summons for bringing on record his Lrs is already filed by plaintiff.  Hence now Notice of Motion 2041/2017 has income infructuous. Hence I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 stands disposed off as it has become infructuous due to death of original defendant no.1 Sharat Mayekar.
ORDER IN CH/S NO.1889/2019
This chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiff for amendment in the plaint to bring on record the fact that defendant no.2 Society has issued Share certificate in respect of suit property in favour of Nilesh Mayekar, the proposed defendant, and said share certificate is issued on the basis of Gift Deed executed by original defendant no.1 Mr.Sharat Mayekar in favour of proposed defendant Mr.Nilesh Mayekar.
Heard adv. Mr.Saraogi for plaintiff and adv. Mr.Lanke is appearing for Mr.Nilesh Mayekar who is respondent  in Chamber Summons No.1406/2018.
Plaintiffs adv. has pointed that original defendant is no more and no reply to this Chamber summons is filed by defendant no.2 Society.
Considering the fact that in the pendancy of this suit share certificate of suit property is issued by defendant no.2 in favour of Mr.Nilesh Mayekar, I find that amendment in the plaint is necessary for the proper decision of the suit.
Further proposed amendment is not going to cause prejudice to defendant no.2. Hence, I find that Chamber summons is necessary to be made absolute. Hence, I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Chamber summons No.1889/2019 is made absolute in terms of prayers of prayer clause(a).
Plaintiff is directed to carry out necessary amendment in plaint within stipulated time provided by law and to serve copy of amended plaint upon proposed defendants as well as defendant no.2.
Matter is adjd. for amendment in the plaint an filing affidavit of service by plaintiff etc. to 03/12/2020.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2020

Date: 06-11-2020
Business: Adv. A.M. Saraogi present for Plaintiffs.
Adv. S.S. Lanke for defendant no.1 present.
Heard plaintiffs adv. and respondents adv. about Chamber summons. Nos.2031/16,  1406/18 and 1889/2019.
ORDER IN CH/SUMMONS NO.2031/2016
Plaintiffs adv. Mr.Saraogi submitted that in the pendancy of the suit original defendant no.1 has executed gift deed of suit property in favour of Sachin Sharad Mayekar, the son of original defendant no.1. Therefore, Chamber summons is necessary to made absolute as original defendant no.1 has created third party right in respect of suit property in favour of respondent no.1.
Plaintiffs adv. also referred the affidavit filed in support of Chamber summons and the affidavit of reply filed by respondent. In said reply original defendant no.1 had filed the reply and  challenged the prayers made in Chamber summons.  It is submitted that original defendant no.1 is no more.
Respondent adv. Mr.Lanke submitted that respondent no.1 had taken out Notice of Motion U/s.9A of CPC for challenging the jurisdiction of this court and therefore unless respondent is made party to the suit said Notice of Motion cannot be heard. Therefore, according to Adv.Lanke, chamber summons may be allowed.
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, Chamber summons no.2031/2016 is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
Order in Chamber summons no.1406/2018.
This chamber summons is taken out by plaintiff for amendment in the plaint to bring Lrs of original defendant no.1 on record, who died on 30/05/2018.  This Chamber summons is filed in the court on 22/06/2018.   Respondent no.1 Nilesh Sharad Mayekar has filed affidavit in reply and resisted the prayers made in Chamber summons.
Heard Adv. Mr.Saraogi for plaintiff and adv. Lanke for respondent no.1 of Chamber summons No.2031/2016.
Both the ld. Advs pointed out that original defendant no.1 Sharat Mayekar has taken out Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 by which respondent  no.1 has challenged the jurisdiction of U/s.9A of CPC.  Now original defendant no.1 is no more, hence, according to both advocates, Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 is necessary to be disposed None present for Plaintiffs.
None present for Defendants.
It seems that due to Corona pandemic, parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 08.02.2021off as respondent Nilesh Mayekar will take out fresh Notice of Motion claiming same relief and therefore, according to both the ld. advs. Chamber summons no.1406/2018 is necessary to be made absolute so that Lrs of original defendant will come on record.
Considering submissions made on behalf of the parties Chamber summon Nos.1406/2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a).
Plaintiff is directed to carry out necessary amendment in plaint within stipulated time provided by law and to serve copy of amended plaint upon proposed defendants as well as defendant no.2.
ORDER IN Notice of Motion NO.2041/2017
This NM is taken out by original defendant Mr.Sharat Mayekar U/s.9A of CPC for challenging the jurisdiction of this Court for entertaining this suit. Plaintiff had filed affidavit of reply to said Notice of Motion.
It is pointed out that in the pendancy of Notice of Motion original defendant no.1 Mr.Sharat Mayekar expired on 30/05/2018 and Chamber summons for bringing on record his Lrs is already filed by plaintiff.  Hence now Notice of Motion 2041/2017 has income infructuous. Hence I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 stands disposed off as it has become infructuous due to death of original defendant no.1 Sharat Mayekar.
ORDER IN CH/S NO.1889/2019
This chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiff for amendment in the plaint to bring on record the fact that defendant no.2 Society has issued Share certificate in respect of suit property in favour of Nilesh Mayekar, the proposed defendant, and said share certificate is issued on the basis of Gift Deed executed by original defendant no.1 Mr.Sharat Mayekar in favour of proposed defendant Mr.Nilesh Mayekar.
Heard adv. Mr.Saraogi for plaintiff and adv. Mr.Lanke is appearing for Mr.Nilesh Mayekar who is respondent  in Chamber Summons No.1406/2018.
Plaintiffs adv. has pointed that original defendant is no more and no reply to this Chamber summons is filed by defendant no.2 Society.
Considering the fact that in the pendancy of this suit share certificate of suit property is issued by defendant no.2 in favour of Mr.Nilesh Mayekar, I find that amendment in the plaint is necessary for the proper decision of the suit.
Further proposed amendment is not going to cause prejudice to defendant no.2. Hence, I find that Chamber summons is necessary to be made absolute. Hence, I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Chamber summons No.1889/2019 is made absolute in terms of prayers of prayer clause(a).
Plaintiff is directed to carry out necessary amendment in plaint within stipulated time provided by law and to serve copy of amended plaint upon proposed defendants as well as defendant no.2.
Matter is adjd. for amendment in the plaint an filing affidavit of service by plaintiff etc. to 03/12/2020.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2020

Date: 06-11-2020
Business: Adv. A.M. Saraogi present for Plaintiffs.
Adv. S.S. Lanke for defendant no.1 present.
Heard plaintiffs adv. and respondents adv. about Chamber summons. Nos.2031/16,  1406/18 and 1889/2019.
ORDER IN CH/SUMMONS NO.2031/2016
Plaintiffs adv. Mr.Saraogi submitted that in the pendancy of the suit original defendant no.1 has executed gift deed of suit property in favour of Sachin Sharad Mayekar, the son of original defendant no.1. Therefore, Chamber summons is necessary to made absolute as original defendant no.1 has created third party right in respect of suit property in favour of respondent no.1.
Plaintiffs adv. also referred the affidavit filed in support of Chamber summons and the affidavit of reply filed by respondent. In said reply original defendant no.1 had filed the reply and  challenged the prayers made in Chamber summons.  It is submitted that original defendant no.1 is no more.
Respondent adv. Mr.Lanke submitted that respondent no.1 had taken out Notice of Motion U/s.9A of CPC for challenging the jurisdiction of this court and therefore unless respondent is made party to the suit said Notice of Motion cannot be heard. Therefore, according to Adv.Lanke, chamber summons may be allowed.
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, Chamber summons no.2031/2016 is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
Order in Chamber summons no.1406/2018.
This chamber summons is taken out by plaintiff for amendment in the plaint to bring Lrs of original defendant no.1 on record, who died on 30/05/2018.  This Chamber summons is filed in the court on 22/06/2018.   Respondent no.1 Nilesh Sharad Mayekar has filed affidavit in reply and resisted the prayers made in Chamber summons.
Heard Adv. Mr.Saraogi for plaintiff and adv. Lanke for respondent no.1 of Chamber summons No.2031/2016.
Both the ld. Advs pointed out that original defendant no.1 Sharat Mayekar has taken out Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 by which respondent  no.1 has challenged the jurisdiction of U/s.9A of CPC.  Now original defendant no.1 is no more, hence, according to both advocates, Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 is necessary to be disposed None present for Plaintiffs.
None present for Defendants.
It seems that due to Corona pandemic, parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 08.02.2021off as respondent Nilesh Mayekar will take out fresh Notice of Motion claiming same relief and therefore, according to both the ld. advs. Chamber summons no.1406/2018 is necessary to be made absolute so that Lrs of original defendant will come on record.
Considering submissions made on behalf of the parties Chamber summon Nos.1406/2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a).
Plaintiff is directed to carry out necessary amendment in plaint within stipulated time provided by law and to serve copy of amended plaint upon proposed defendants as well as defendant no.2.
ORDER IN Notice of Motion NO.2041/2017
This NM is taken out by original defendant Mr.Sharat Mayekar U/s.9A of CPC for challenging the jurisdiction of this Court for entertaining this suit. Plaintiff had filed affidavit of reply to said Notice of Motion.
It is pointed out that in the pendancy of Notice of Motion original defendant no.1 Mr.Sharat Mayekar expired on 30/05/2018 and Chamber summons for bringing on record his Lrs is already filed by plaintiff.  Hence now Notice of Motion 2041/2017 has income infructuous. Hence I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 stands disposed off as it has become infructuous due to death of original defendant no.1 Sharat Mayekar.
ORDER IN CH/S NO.1889/2019
This chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiff for amendment in the plaint to bring on record the fact that defendant no.2 Society has issued Share certificate in respect of suit property in favour of Nilesh Mayekar, the proposed defendant, and said share certificate is issued on the basis of Gift Deed executed by original defendant no.1 Mr.Sharat Mayekar in favour of proposed defendant Mr.Nilesh Mayekar.
Heard adv. Mr.Saraogi for plaintiff and adv. Mr.Lanke is appearing for Mr.Nilesh Mayekar who is respondent  in Chamber Summons No.1406/2018.
Plaintiffs adv. has pointed that original defendant is no more and no reply to this Chamber summons is filed by defendant no.2 Society.
Considering the fact that in the pendancy of this suit share certificate of suit property is issued by defendant no.2 in favour of Mr.Nilesh Mayekar, I find that amendment in the plaint is necessary for the proper decision of the suit.
Further proposed amendment is not going to cause prejudice to defendant no.2. Hence, I find that Chamber summons is necessary to be made absolute. Hence, I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Chamber summons No.1889/2019 is made absolute in terms of prayers of prayer clause(a).
Plaintiff is directed to carry out necessary amendment in plaint within stipulated time provided by law and to serve copy of amended plaint upon proposed defendants as well as defendant no.2.
Matter is adjd. for amendment in the plaint an filing affidavit of service by plaintiff etc. to 03/12/2020.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2020

Date: 06-11-2020
Business: Adv. A.M. Saraogi present for Plaintiffs.
Adv. S.S. Lanke for defendant no.1 present.
Heard plaintiffs adv. and respondents adv. about Chamber summons. Nos.2031/16,  1406/18 and 1889/2019.
ORDER IN CH/SUMMONS NO.2031/2016
Plaintiffs adv. Mr.Saraogi submitted that in the pendancy of the suit original defendant no.1 has executed gift deed of suit property in favour of Sachin Sharad Mayekar, the son of original defendant no.1. Therefore, Chamber summons is necessary to made absolute as original defendant no.1 has created third party right in respect of suit property in favour of respondent no.1.
Plaintiffs adv. also referred the affidavit filed in support of Chamber summons and the affidavit of reply filed by respondent. In said reply original defendant no.1 had filed the reply and  challenged the prayers made in Chamber summons.  It is submitted that original defendant no.1 is no more.
Respondent adv. Mr.Lanke submitted that respondent no.1 had taken out Notice of Motion U/s.9A of CPC for challenging the jurisdiction of this court and therefore unless respondent is made party to the suit said Notice of Motion cannot be heard. Therefore, according to Adv.Lanke, chamber summons may be allowed.
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, Chamber summons no.2031/2016 is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
Order in Chamber summons no.1406/2018.
This chamber summons is taken out by plaintiff for amendment in the plaint to bring Lrs of original defendant no.1 on record, who died on 30/05/2018.  This Chamber summons is filed in the court on 22/06/2018.   Respondent no.1 Nilesh Sharad Mayekar has filed affidavit in reply and resisted the prayers made in Chamber summons.
Heard Adv. Mr.Saraogi for plaintiff and adv. Lanke for respondent no.1 of Chamber summons No.2031/2016.
Both the ld. Advs pointed out that original defendant no.1 Sharat Mayekar has taken out Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 by which respondent  no.1 has challenged the jurisdiction of U/s.9A of CPC.  Now original defendant no.1 is no more, hence, according to both advocates, Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 is necessary to be disposed None present for Plaintiffs.
None present for Defendants.
It seems that due to Corona pandemic, parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 08.02.2021off as respondent Nilesh Mayekar will take out fresh Notice of Motion claiming same relief and therefore, according to both the ld. advs. Chamber summons no.1406/2018 is necessary to be made absolute so that Lrs of original defendant will come on record.
Considering submissions made on behalf of the parties Chamber summon Nos.1406/2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a).
Plaintiff is directed to carry out necessary amendment in plaint within stipulated time provided by law and to serve copy of amended plaint upon proposed defendants as well as defendant no.2.
ORDER IN Notice of Motion NO.2041/2017
This NM is taken out by original defendant Mr.Sharat Mayekar U/s.9A of CPC for challenging the jurisdiction of this Court for entertaining this suit. Plaintiff had filed affidavit of reply to said Notice of Motion.
It is pointed out that in the pendancy of Notice of Motion original defendant no.1 Mr.Sharat Mayekar expired on 30/05/2018 and Chamber summons for bringing on record his Lrs is already filed by plaintiff.  Hence now Notice of Motion 2041/2017 has income infructuous. Hence I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 stands disposed off as it has become infructuous due to death of original defendant no.1 Sharat Mayekar.
ORDER IN CH/S NO.1889/2019
This chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiff for amendment in the plaint to bring on record the fact that defendant no.2 Society has issued Share certificate in respect of suit property in favour of Nilesh Mayekar, the proposed defendant, and said share certificate is issued on the basis of Gift Deed executed by original defendant no.1 Mr.Sharat Mayekar in favour of proposed defendant Mr.Nilesh Mayekar.
Heard adv. Mr.Saraogi for plaintiff and adv. Mr.Lanke is appearing for Mr.Nilesh Mayekar who is respondent  in Chamber Summons No.1406/2018.
Plaintiffs adv. has pointed that original defendant is no more and no reply to this Chamber summons is filed by defendant no.2 Society.
Considering the fact that in the pendancy of this suit share certificate of suit property is issued by defendant no.2 in favour of Mr.Nilesh Mayekar, I find that amendment in the plaint is necessary for the proper decision of the suit.
Further proposed amendment is not going to cause prejudice to defendant no.2. Hence, I find that Chamber summons is necessary to be made absolute. Hence, I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Chamber summons No.1889/2019 is made absolute in terms of prayers of prayer clause(a).
Plaintiff is directed to carry out necessary amendment in plaint within stipulated time provided by law and to serve copy of amended plaint upon proposed defendants as well as defendant no.2.
Matter is adjd. for amendment in the plaint an filing affidavit of service by plaintiff etc. to 03/12/2020.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2020

Date: 06-11-2020
Business: Adv. A.M. Saraogi present for Plaintiffs.
Adv. S.S. Lanke for defendant no.1 present.
Heard plaintiffs adv. and respondents adv. about Chamber summons. Nos.2031/16,  1406/18 and 1889/2019.
ORDER IN CH/SUMMONS NO.2031/2016
Plaintiffs adv. Mr.Saraogi submitted that in the pendancy of the suit original defendant no.1 has executed gift deed of suit property in favour of Sachin Sharad Mayekar, the son of original defendant no.1. Therefore, Chamber summons is necessary to made absolute as original defendant no.1 has created third party right in respect of suit property in favour of respondent no.1.
Plaintiffs adv. also referred the affidavit filed in support of Chamber summons and the affidavit of reply filed by respondent. In said reply original defendant no.1 had filed the reply and  challenged the prayers made in Chamber summons.  It is submitted that original defendant no.1 is no more.
Respondent adv. Mr.Lanke submitted that respondent no.1 had taken out Notice of Motion U/s.9A of CPC for challenging the jurisdiction of this court and therefore unless respondent is made party to the suit said Notice of Motion cannot be heard. Therefore, according to Adv.Lanke, chamber summons may be allowed.
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, Chamber summons no.2031/2016 is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
Order in Chamber summons no.1406/2018.
This chamber summons is taken out by plaintiff for amendment in the plaint to bring Lrs of original defendant no.1 on record, who died on 30/05/2018.  This Chamber summons is filed in the court on 22/06/2018.   Respondent no.1 Nilesh Sharad Mayekar has filed affidavit in reply and resisted the prayers made in Chamber summons.
Heard Adv. Mr.Saraogi for plaintiff and adv. Lanke for respondent no.1 of Chamber summons No.2031/2016.
Both the ld. Advs pointed out that original defendant no.1 Sharat Mayekar has taken out Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 by which respondent  no.1 has challenged the jurisdiction of U/s.9A of CPC.  Now original defendant no.1 is no more, hence, according to both advocates, Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 is necessary to be disposed None present for Plaintiffs.
None present for Defendants.
It seems that due to Corona pandemic, parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 08.02.2021off as respondent Nilesh Mayekar will take out fresh Notice of Motion claiming same relief and therefore, according to both the ld. advs. Chamber summons no.1406/2018 is necessary to be made absolute so that Lrs of original defendant will come on record.
Considering submissions made on behalf of the parties Chamber summon Nos.1406/2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a).
Plaintiff is directed to carry out necessary amendment in plaint within stipulated time provided by law and to serve copy of amended plaint upon proposed defendants as well as defendant no.2.
ORDER IN Notice of Motion NO.2041/2017
This NM is taken out by original defendant Mr.Sharat Mayekar U/s.9A of CPC for challenging the jurisdiction of this Court for entertaining this suit. Plaintiff had filed affidavit of reply to said Notice of Motion.
It is pointed out that in the pendancy of Notice of Motion original defendant no.1 Mr.Sharat Mayekar expired on 30/05/2018 and Chamber summons for bringing on record his Lrs is already filed by plaintiff.  Hence now Notice of Motion 2041/2017 has income infructuous. Hence I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Notice of Motion No.2041/2017 stands disposed off as it has become infructuous due to death of original defendant no.1 Sharat Mayekar.
ORDER IN CH/S NO.1889/2019
This chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiff for amendment in the plaint to bring on record the fact that defendant no.2 Society has issued Share certificate in respect of suit property in favour of Nilesh Mayekar, the proposed defendant, and said share certificate is issued on the basis of Gift Deed executed by original defendant no.1 Mr.Sharat Mayekar in favour of proposed defendant Mr.Nilesh Mayekar.
Heard adv. Mr.Saraogi for plaintiff and adv. Mr.Lanke is appearing for Mr.Nilesh Mayekar who is respondent  in Chamber Summons No.1406/2018.
Plaintiffs adv. has pointed that original defendant is no more and no reply to this Chamber summons is filed by defendant no.2 Society.
Considering the fact that in the pendancy of this suit share certificate of suit property is issued by defendant no.2 in favour of Mr.Nilesh Mayekar, I find that amendment in the plaint is necessary for the proper decision of the suit.
Further proposed amendment is not going to cause prejudice to defendant no.2. Hence, I find that Chamber summons is necessary to be made absolute. Hence, I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Chamber summons No.1889/2019 is made absolute in terms of prayers of prayer clause(a).
Plaintiff is directed to carry out necessary amendment in plaint within stipulated time provided by law and to serve copy of amended plaint upon proposed defendants as well as defendant no.2.
Matter is adjd. for amendment in the plaint an filing affidavit of service by plaintiff etc. to 03/12/2020.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2020

Date: 03-12-2020
Business: Adv. Ravindra Singh present for Plaintiffs.
Adv. Jitendra Gautam present for Defendants.
By consent case is adjourned to 18/12/2020 for Service.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 18-12-2020

Date: 18-12-2020
Business: Advocate Ms. Puja Narvekar for plaintiff present.
None present for Defendants.
It seems that due to Corona pandemic, no one is present, hence case is adjourned to 25/01/2021 for service of NM.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 25-01-2021

Date: 25-01-2021
Business: Adv Ms.Neha Pandey h/f Adv. Mr.Sarogi for plff present.
None present for deft.
As nobody present for defendant, considering present pandemic condition, matter is adjd. for service to  23.03.2021.
Judge
L.O.
Adv Mr.Jitendra Gautam for deft 1A to 1C present and tendered registered NM No. 76/2021 along with affidavit in support.
As next date is already given earlier , matter adjd.for reply of plff to 23.03.2021 to NM.
L.O.
Adv Ms. Neha Pandey for plff present and filed reply to Nm No.76/2021.
Already adjd. to 23.03.2021
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 23-03-2021

Date: 23-03-2021
Business: Adv Ms. Narvekar h/f Adv Mr. Sarogi for plff present.
None present for defts.
N.M. No.76/2021 is pending for hearing.
As nobody is present for deft 1(A), said NM be kept for order on next date.
Matter is adjd. for NM order to 26.04.2021.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 26-04-2021

Date: 26-04-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 26-07-2021

Date: 26-04-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 26-07-2021

Date: 26-07-2021
Business: None present for the plff.
Adv Mr.Jitendra Gautam h/f Adv Mr.Lanke  for deft 1a to 1c  present and submitted that copy of reply filed in NM NO.76/2021 is not served on him by the plff till date.
Plff is directed to serve the copy of reply on the adv. for deft Nos.1a to 1c if not already served.
As nobody is present for plff, considering the present pandemic condition, matter adjd. for supplying copy of NM reply and NM hearing
Matter is adjd. for supplying copy of NM reply and NM hearing to 27.08.2021.
Judge
L.O.
Adv. Mr. Ravindra Sing h/f Adv Mr. A.M. Sarogi for plff present and seeks adjournment by submitting that he will serve the copy of reply on the adv. for other side before next date.
Already adjd. to 27.08.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-08-2021

Date: 27-08-2021
Business: Adv Mr. Sarogi for the plff present and submitted that reply filed by the plff to NM No.76/2021 may not be considered and he may be permitted to argue said NM orally. His submission is accepted.
Adv Mr.Jitendra Gautam h/f Adv Mr. Lanke for deft present and seeks adjournment by submitting that his senior advocate is unable to attend this Court today. Adv. for plff objected for adjournment however, for the reason stated by the junior advocate, adjournment as a last chance is granted.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 20.09.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2021

Date: 20-09-2021
Business: Adv Ms. Neha Pandey for plff present and seeks adjournment.          O- Adjournment as a last chance is granted as matter is old.
Adv Mr. Lanke for deft 1a to 1c present.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 27.10.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2021

Date: 20-09-2021
Business: Adv Ms. Neha Pandey for plff present and seeks adjournment.          O- Adjournment as a last chance is granted as matter is old.
Adv Mr. Lanke for deft 1a to 1c present.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 27.10.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2021

Date: 20-09-2021
Business: Adv Ms. Neha Pandey for plff present and seeks adjournment.          O- Adjournment as a last chance is granted as matter is old.
Adv Mr. Lanke for deft 1a to 1c present.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 27.10.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2021

Date: 20-09-2021
Business: Adv Ms. Neha Pandey for plff present and seeks adjournment.          O- Adjournment as a last chance is granted as matter is old.
Adv Mr. Lanke for deft 1a to 1c present.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 27.10.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2021

Date: 20-09-2021
Business: Adv Ms. Neha Pandey for plff present and seeks adjournment.          O- Adjournment as a last chance is granted as matter is old.
Adv Mr. Lanke for deft 1a to 1c present.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 27.10.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2021

Date: 27-10-2021
Business: Adv Mr. Shrivastav h/f Adv Mr. Sarogi  present for plff. and seeks adjournment by submitting that adv. Mr. Sarogi for plff is not feeling well today.
Adv Mr.Jitendra Gautam present for deft.Nos.1a,1b and 1c.
For the reason stated by the adv. for plff, by consent, matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 10.12.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2021

Date: 10-12-2021
Business: Adv Mr. Singh  present for plff.
Adv. Ms. Pal h/f Adv Mr.Lanke present for deft.1a to 1c and seeks adjournment by submitting that her senior advocate is not available today.
By consent, matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 14.01.2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2022

Date: 14-01-2022
Business: Due to Covid-19, matter is adjd.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 21-03-2022

Date: 14-01-2022
Business: Due to Covid-19, matter is adjd.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 21-03-2022

Date: 14-01-2022
Business: Due to Covid-19, matter is adjd.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 21-03-2022

Date: 14-01-2022
Business: Due to Covid-19, matter is adjd.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 21-03-2022

Date: 21-03-2022
Business: Adv Neha Pandey present for plff. and seeks adjournment.
Adv Poonam Pal  present for deft.1a to 1c.
By consent, matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 10.06.2022.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-06-2022

Date: 10-06-2022
Business: Adv.Neha Pandey h/f.Adv.Sarogi for plaintiff present.
Adv.Lanke for deft. present.
As Court is busy in hearing in other matters and for want of time matter is adjourned.
Matter adjd to 01.07.2022 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 01-07-2022

Date: 01-07-2022
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv.Poonam Pal for deft.No.1a to 1c present. She requested for adjournment. Otherside is absent. Hence, matter is adjourned.
Matter adjd to 10.08.2022 for NM Hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-08-2022

Date: 01-07-2022
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv.Poonam Pal for deft.No.1a to 1c present. She requested for adjournment. Otherside is absent. Hence, matter is adjourned.
Matter adjd to 10.08.2022 for NM Hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-08-2022

Date: 10-08-2022
Business: Adv.Neha Pandey h/f.Adv.Ashok Sarogi for plaintiff present.
Adv.Poonam Pal h/f.Adv.Lanke for deft.No.1(a) to 1(c) present. She orally requested for adjournment. Last chance granted.
Matter adjd to 07.10.2022 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2022

Date: 10-08-2022
Business: Adv.Neha Pandey h/f.Adv.Ashok Sarogi for plaintiff present.
Adv.Poonam Pal h/f.Adv.Lanke for deft.No.1(a) to 1(c) present. She orally requested for adjournment. Last chance granted.
Matter adjd to 07.10.2022 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2022

Date: 10-08-2022
Business: Adv.Neha Pandey h/f.Adv.Ashok Sarogi for plaintiff present.
Adv.Poonam Pal h/f.Adv.Lanke for deft.No.1(a) to 1(c) present. She orally requested for adjournment. Last chance granted.
Matter adjd to 07.10.2022 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2022

Date: 10-08-2022
Business: Adv.Neha Pandey h/f.Adv.Ashok Sarogi for plaintiff present.
Adv.Poonam Pal h/f.Adv.Lanke for deft.No.1(a) to 1(c) present. She orally requested for adjournment. Last chance granted.
Matter adjd to 07.10.2022 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2022

Date: 10-08-2022
Business: Adv.Neha Pandey h/f.Adv.Ashok Sarogi for plaintiff present.
Adv.Poonam Pal h/f.Adv.Lanke for deft.No.1(a) to 1(c) present. She orally requested for adjournment. Last chance granted.
Matter adjd to 07.10.2022 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2022

Date: 07-10-2022
Business: Adv.Sana Khan for plaintiff present.
Adv.Poonam Pal h/f.Adv.Lanke for deft.No.1a to 1c present.
On oral request of the pltff. adjd for NM hearing.
Matter adjd to 13.12.2022 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2022

Date: 07-10-2022
Business: Adv.Sana Khan for plaintiff present.
Adv.Poonam Pal h/f.Adv.Lanke for deft.No.1a to 1c present.
On oral request of the pltff. adjd for NM hearing.
Matter adjd to 13.12.2022 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2022

Date: 13-12-2022
Business: Court is on leave, hence, adjourned.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 08-02-2023

Date: 13-12-2022
Business: Court is on leave, hence, adjourned.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 08-02-2023

Date: 13-12-2022
Business: Court is on leave, hence, adjourned.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 08-02-2023

Date: 13-12-2022
Business: Court is on leave, hence, adjourned.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 08-02-2023

Date: 13-12-2022
Business: Court is on leave, hence, adjourned.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 08-02-2023

Date: 08-02-2023
Business: court is on leave.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2023

Date: 01-04-2023
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv.Deepak Sharma for defendant No.1a to 1c present. He undertakes to file vakalatnama on next date for deft. No.1a to 1c.
Matter adjd to 28.06.2023 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-06-2023

Date: 28-06-2023
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 04-08-2023

Date: 04-08-2023
Business: Adv. Karan Choudhary h/f. Adv. Sarogi for plaintiff present.
None for defendant
Matter is adjd.to   04.09.2023 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 04-09-2023

Date: 04-09-2023
Business: Adv. Karan Chaudhary for plaintiff present.
Adv. Poonam Pal for defendants no. 1a to 1c present and filed vakalatnma t.o.r. marked as Exh.4
Matter is adjd.to 18-10-2023 for NM Hrg.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 18-10-2023

Date: 18-10-2023
Business: Adv. Srivastav for plaintiff present.
Adv. Parkar for defendant present.
Matter is adjd.to 01-12-2023 for NM Hrg.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 01-12-2023

Date: 01-12-2023
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-01-2024

Date: 17-01-2024
Business: Adv. Vikas Mishra  for plaintiff present.
Adv. Poonam Pal for defendants no. 1a to 1c present.
Matter is adjourned to 26-02-2024 for NM Hrg.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2024

Date: 26-02-2024
Business: Adv. Ravindra Singh for plaintiff present.
Adv. Deepak Sharma for defendants no. 1(a) to 1(c) present.
Matter is adjourned to 22-03-2024 for NM Hrg.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 22-03-2024

Date: 22-03-2024
Business: Adv. Ajay Pal a/w Adv. Vikas Mishra for plaintiff present.
None for defendant
Matter is adjourned to  20-06-2024 for  NM Hrg.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2024

Date: 20-06-2024
Business: Adv. Shrivastav for plaintiff present.
Adv. Dipak Sharma  for defendant present.
On the oral request of both the counsel.
Matter is adjourned to  20-08 -2024 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-08-2024

Date: 20-08-2024
Business: Adv.Neha Pandey for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 20-09-2024 for NM Hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2024

Date: 20-08-2024
Business: Adv.Neha Pandey for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 20-09-2024 for NM Hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2024

Date: 20-08-2024
Business: Adv.Neha Pandey for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 20-09-2024 for NM Hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2024

Date: 20-08-2024
Business: Adv.Neha Pandey for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Matter is adjourned to 20-09-2024 for NM Hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2024

Date: 20-09-2024
Business: None for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
There are total 04 notice of motions pending, out of which 03 are more than 05 years old so, parties are directed that to proceed with the motions otherwise it will be proceeded further as per the provisions of law.
Matter is adjourned to 20.11.2024 for NM for hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-11-2024

Date: 20-09-2024
Business: None for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
There are total 04 notice of motions pending, out of which 03 are more than 05 years old so, parties are directed that to proceed with the motions otherwise it will be proceeded further as per the provisions of law.
Matter is adjourned to 20.11.2024 for NM for hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-11-2024

Date: 20-09-2024
Business: None for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
There are total 04 notice of motions pending, out of which 03 are more than 05 years old so, parties are directed that to proceed with the motions otherwise it will be proceeded further as per the provisions of law.
Matter is adjourned to 20.11.2024 for NM for hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-11-2024

Date: 20-09-2024
Business: None for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
There are total 04 notice of motions pending, out of which 03 are more than 05 years old so, parties are directed that to proceed with the motions otherwise it will be proceeded further as per the provisions of law.
Matter is adjourned to 20.11.2024 for NM for hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-11-2024

Date: 20-09-2024
Business: None for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
There are total 04 notice of motions pending, out of which 03 are more than 05 years old so, parties are directed that to proceed with the motions otherwise it will be proceeded further as per the provisions of law.
Matter is adjourned to 20.11.2024 for NM for hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 20-11-2024

Date: 20-11-2024
Business: CORAM - HIS HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE,
SHRI. A. SUBRAMANIAM (C. R. NO.19)
(Matter taken on todays board in view of holiday declared on 20.11.2024 on account of Polling Day of General Election of State Legislative Assembly of Maharashtra.)
(Matter received from CR No.62 as per order dtd. 08.10.2024.)
None present for parties.
Adjourned on 09.12.2024 at 11.00am for NM Hearing.
Original notice of motion No.1536 of 2018 not tendered by advocate of plaintiff till today. Plaintiff to tender registered NM No.1536 of 2018 on next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2024

Date: 20-11-2024
Business: CORAM - HIS HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE,
SHRI. A. SUBRAMANIAM (C. R. NO.19)
(Matter taken on todays board in view of holiday declared on 20.11.2024 on account of Polling Day of General Election of State Legislative Assembly of Maharashtra.)
(Matter received from CR No.62 as per order dtd. 08.10.2024.)
None present for parties.
Adjourned on 09.12.2024 at 11.00am for NM Hearing.
Original notice of motion No.1536 of 2018 not tendered by advocate of plaintiff till today. Plaintiff to tender registered NM No.1536 of 2018 on next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2024

Date: 20-11-2024
Business: CORAM - HIS HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE,
SHRI. A. SUBRAMANIAM (C. R. NO.19)
(Matter taken on todays board in view of holiday declared on 20.11.2024 on account of Polling Day of General Election of State Legislative Assembly of Maharashtra.)
(Matter received from CR No.62 as per order dtd. 08.10.2024.)
None present for parties.
Adjourned on 09.12.2024 at 11.00am for NM Hearing.
Original notice of motion No.1536 of 2018 not tendered by advocate of plaintiff till today. Plaintiff to tender registered NM No.1536 of 2018 on next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2024

Date: 20-11-2024
Business: CORAM - HIS HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE,
SHRI. A. SUBRAMANIAM (C. R. NO.19)
(Matter taken on todays board in view of holiday declared on 20.11.2024 on account of Polling Day of General Election of State Legislative Assembly of Maharashtra.)
(Matter received from CR No.62 as per order dtd. 08.10.2024.)
None present for parties.
Adjourned on 09.12.2024 at 11.00am for NM Hearing.
Original notice of motion No.1536 of 2018 not tendered by advocate of plaintiff till today. Plaintiff to tender registered NM No.1536 of 2018 on next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2024

Date: 20-11-2024
Business: CORAM - HIS HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE,
SHRI. A. SUBRAMANIAM (C. R. NO.19)
(Matter taken on todays board in view of holiday declared on 20.11.2024 on account of Polling Day of General Election of State Legislative Assembly of Maharashtra.)
(Matter received from CR No.62 as per order dtd. 08.10.2024.)
None present for parties.
Adjourned on 09.12.2024 at 11.00am for NM Hearing.
Original notice of motion No.1536 of 2018 not tendered by advocate of plaintiff till today. Plaintiff to tender registered NM No.1536 of 2018 on next date.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2024

Date: 09-12-2024
Business: CORAM - HIS HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE,
SHRI. A. SUBRAMANIAM (C. R. NO.19)
None present for plaintiff.
None present for defendant.
NM No. 76/2021 stands dismissed for default. It is clarified that contention raised in the NM as raised in pleading will be considered along with suit.
None present for plaintiff NM No. 1536/2015.
Original NM No. 1536/2015 not tendered by plaintiff, in compliance of order dated 21/11/2024. Hence, NM No. 1536/2018 stands dismissed in default.
In view of contention made in NM 4552/2016, NM 3566/2016 stands dismissed in default. Suit is place for draft issues. No written statement filed. Suit is proceed without written statement against defendant. Place for further direction.
Matter is adjourned to 24-12-2024 for further directions.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 09-12-2024

Main Case No: SUIT/0102077/2016
Main Cnr: MHCC010079992016
Main Filing No: 111447

Registration Number: 101536/2018
Transfer Date: 23-04-2019
From Court: 2 - COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
To Court: 9 - COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Registration Number: 101536/2018
Transfer Date: 10-06-2021
From Court: 9 - COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
To Court: 62 - COURT 62 AD-HOC  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Registration Number: 101536/2018
Transfer Date: 19-10-2024
From Court: 62 - COURT 62 AD-HOC  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
To Court: 19 - COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT

Filing Number: 105233/2018
Filing Date: 12-04-2018
First Hearing Date: 21st June 2018
Decision Date: 09th December 2024
Court Number And Judge: 19-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT