Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Sanjay Kumar Motilal GuptaVsSamdevi Motilal Gupta And Ors

CNR MHCC0100478420199-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 02nd November 2019

TrustJury record updated 20 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101748/2019
Registration Date
03 May 2019

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 08-07-2019
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2019
    
    Date: 03-09-2019
    Business: Adv. Jenifer Sonz for plaintiff present and submitted that plaintiff will serve writ of summons to defendant No. 11 through RPAD.
    Adv. Malika Joshi For defendant No. 1,2 and 3 present and served copy of written statement of those defendant upon plaintiff\''s advocate.
    WS of defendant No. 1 to 3 is already on record at Exh- 7
    Case is adjourned to 02/11/2019
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 02-11-2019
    
    Date: 02-11-2019
    Business: Advocate Manoj Tiwari for Plaintiff present and in roznama dated 03/09/2019 it is mentioned that Written Statement of Defendant nos.1 to 3 i.e. Exh.7 is on record, however those Defendants have not appeared in the matter hence no question arises of their Written Statement being on record.  As submitted by Plaintiff advocate it becomes clear that Roznama of some other matter is affixed to this suit by showing the number as suit no.869/19.  Any how as Defendant nos.1 to 3 have not appeared in the matter roznama dated 03/09/2019 is necessary to be considered as incorrect.
              Affidavit of service of writ of summons filed by Plaintiff on 29/03/2019 shows that writ of summons is served upon Defendants inspite of it Defendants have not appeared in the matter and they have not filed their appearance and Written Statement.  Defendants have not filed their reply to NM no.1748/19, hence considering the fact that document at page no.42 and 42A of the plaint, shows that Defendant no.1 the mother of Plaintiff has requested Defendant no.5 Society to mention the name of Plaintiff and Defendant no.1 in the record of Society related to suit premises, I find that Defendant nos.1 to 4 can not create third party interest in suit premises as Plaintiff is one of the legal heir entitled to claim rights in suit premises. Hence, I find that Notice of Motion can be made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b) and (c) of Notice of Motion.  Hence, Notice of Motion no.1748 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b) and (c).
    As Defendants have not filed their Written Statement, suit to proceed for evidence without Written Statement.
    Case is adjourned to 16/01/2020 for evidence without Written Statement.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 02-11-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 105394/2019
    Filing Date: 03-05-2019
    First Hearing Date: 08th July 2019
    Decision Date: 02nd November 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 9-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    02 Nov 2019

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Advocate Manoj Tiwari for Plaintiff present and in roznama dated 03/09/2019 it is mentioned that Written Statement of Defendant nos.1 to 3 i.e. Exh.7 is on record, however those Defendants have not appeared in the matter hence no question arises of their Written Statement being on record. As submitted by Plaintiff advocate it becomes clear that Roznama of some other matter is affixed to this suit by showing the number as suit no.869/19. Any how…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.