Full Order Text
Order 1 · 20 Jan 2020 · CNR MHCC010047732018
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: C/S No.710/18 1 Suit No.2792/16 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.710/2018 (CNR No.MHCC010047732018) IN S.C SUIT NO.2792/2016 Ankush Tibrewala .. Applicant/ Defendant no.3 In the matter of : 3A Financial Services Limited .. Plaintiff. V/s. 1. Tata Consultancy Limited 2. TSR Darashaw Private Limited 3. Ankush Tibrewala 4. Pradip Kumar Gupta ..Defendants Appearance : Ld. Advs. Mr. Dhangar @ Mr.Gosar and Mr.J.R. Vyas for plaintiff. Ld. Adv. Mangesh Bhende for defendant no.3. CORAM : HHJ Shri V.V Vidwans C. R. No.03 DATE : 20.1.2020. ORAL ORDER 1. Perused Chamber Summons supported by an affidavit of Mr.Ankush Tibrewala on behalf of defendant no.3. The chamber summons is strongly opposed by the plaintiff by submitting affidavit in reply filed by Mr.Ajay Rathod. Seen and considered the same. 2. I have heard Ld. Counsels for both sides. 3. Present chamber summons is taken out by defendant no.3 for setting aside/ modifying the order dated 9.6.2017 to the extent of -- 1 of 4 -- C/S No.710/18 2 Suit No.2792/16 suit proceeding exparte against defendant no.3. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for defendant no.3 that, the defendant had received writ of summons in the suit and had instructed Advocate Mr. Mangesh Bhende (i.e. me) to appear before the court. Accordingly, I had appeared before the court and had undertaken to file V.P. on next date. Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.3 submitted that, he intended to challenge maintainability of the present suit by taking out necessary Motion on the ground that, in respect of same cause of action defendant no.3 had filed title suit bearing No.1279/2013 at Kolkata against defendants no.1 and 2 and others. On 14.3.2017, Board was discharged and matter was adjourned to 9.6.2017, till then, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff had not served copy of plaint on the defendant no.3. However, on 9.6.2017, Advocate for the defendant no.3 was unable to reach the court in time due to his personal difficulty and therefore, the order came to be passed to proceed exparte against the defendant no.3. Similarly, order was also passed in two other connected suits against the defendant. It is submitted that, the suit was fixed for compliance by the plaintiff on 9.6.2017 and defendant no.3 was not expected to take any active part in the proceeding. Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.3 submitted that, he has taken out separate Motion for challenging the maintainability of the suit. Under the above circumstances, it is submitted that, the order dated 9.6.2017 is liable to be set aside/ modified, in the interest of justice. 4. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has strongly opposed the chamber summons and relied on affidavit in reply and submitted that, the chamber summons taken out by defendant no.3 is not maintainable in law. It is misconceived and the facts stated in the supporting affidavit are contrary to the record and therefore, it is liable to be dismissed with -- 2 of 4 -- C/S No.710/18 3 Suit No.2792/16 compensatory costs. Ld Counsel for the plaintiff has denied all the adverse allegations made in the supporting affidavit. 5. After considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsels for both sides, I find that, the chamber summons, as framed and filed and taken out by defendant no.3, is itself defective/ not maintainable in law because the relief, which is sought in the chamber summons, cannot be granted by this court n a chamber summons proceeding, as the said relief can be obtained by the defendant no.3 by taking out necessary Motion. It appears that, inadvertently, Ld Counsel for the defendant no.3 has taken out the chamber summons for setting aside/modifying the order dated 9.6.2017, which is not maintainable as per Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 and Rules framed thereunder. Hence, I proceed to pass following order: ORDER 1. Chamber Summons No.710/2018 is hereby dismissed, as not maintainable in law with a liberty to the Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.3 to take out appropriate Motion/ steps for seeking the relief, which is sought in the present chamber summons. C/S stands disposed of accordingly. (V.V. Vidwans) Judge, City Civil Court, Date: 20.1.2020 Gr. Bombay (C.R. 03) Dictated on : 20.1.2020 Transcribed on: 20.1.2020 Draft given to HHJ on : 20.1.2020 Signed by HHJ on : 23.1.2020 -- 3 of 4 -- C/S No.710/18 4 Suit No.2792/16 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ ORDER. UPLOADED ON : 23.1.2020 (NITIN V. UBALE) SELECTION GR. STENOGRAPHER. Name of the judge (with Court Room No.) Shri V.V. Vidwans, Judge, (C.R. 03) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/ Order 20.1.2020 Judgment/ order signed by P.O on 23.1.2020 Judgment/ order uploaded on 23.1.2020 -- 4 of 4 --
