Full Order Text
Order 1 · 24 Jul 2018 · CNR MHCC010047062018
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: CS 69318 in L.C. SU 228111 : 1 : Dt. 24.07.2018 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 693 OF 2018 (CNR NO. MHCC010047062018) IN LONG CAUSE SUIT NO. 2281 OF 2011 (CNR NO. MHCC010028532011) St. Pius XCooperative Housing Society Ltd. ...Plaintiff Versus Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai ...Defendant And Shanti Campus Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. ...Proposed Deft. No. 2 CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE SMT. SANJASHREE J. GHARAT (C.R. NO.08) DATE : 24.07.2018. Adv. Mr. A.P. Steenson for Plaintiff. Adv. Mrs. Kamble for Defendant / BMC. ORAL ORDER The present Chamber Summons is filed by the Plaintiff to implead Shanti Campus Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. as party to the present proceedings. 2. It is submitted by the Plaintiff that Shanti Campus Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. is sharing common wall and Plaintiff Society is facing issue of water logging. Therefore, the Proposed Defendant is necessary for just decision of the case. Hence, Plaintiff prayed that Proposed Defendant be added as Defendant No. 2 in the matter. -- 1 of 3 -- CS 69318 in L.C. SU 228111 : 2 : Dt. 24.07.2018 3. The Defendant / Corporation filed Say and resisted application. 4. Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of both parties. 5. The present Chamber Summons is taken out by the Plaintiff to add Proposed Defendant as Defendant No. 2 to the present proceeding. The Plaintiff claims that the dispute in the present matter pertains to common wall between Plaintiff Society and Proposed Defendant No. 2. It is further contention that there is problem of water logging. Therefore Plaintiff claims that Proposed Defendant is necessary party. 6. The Plaintiff is the dominus litus of his case. Plaintiff claims that the Proposed Defendant is necessary for the just decision of the case. The Proposed Defendant is the proper party to the present proceedings. Hence, the prayer made by the Plaintiff for adding Proposed Defendant as Defendant no. 2 needs to be allowed. Therefore, I proceed to pass following Order : ORDER 1. The Chamber Summons No. 693 of 2018 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Plaintiff is directed to carry out amendment within Fourteen (14) days from the date of this order and to furnish copy of the -- 2 of 3 -- CS 69318 in L.C. SU 228111 : 3 : Dt. 24.07.2018 amended Plaint on record. (SANJASHREE J. GHARAT ) Judge City Civil Court Gr. Mumbai. Date : 24.07.2018 Dictated on : 24.07.2018. Transcribed on : 25.07.2018. Signed on : 26.07.2018. “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 26.07.2018 at 5.40 p.m. (Y.M. SAKHARKAR) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room no.) SMT. SANJASHREE J. GHARAT (C.R. NO.08) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ ORDER 24.07.2018 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 26.07.2018 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 26.07.2018 -- 3 of 3 --
