Full Order Text
Order 1 · 19 Oct 2023 · CNR MHCC010046772018
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Order on Notice of Motion No. 1492 of 2018 MHCC010046772018 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1492 of 2018 IN S. C. SUIT NO.2981 of 2014. Mr. Bharathan Suresh Babu. ...Plaintiff/ … Applicant. In the matter of :- Mr. Bharathan Suresh Babu. ..Plaintiff V/s. Me. Dinesh Patel ..Defendant. Appearances :- Adv.Bhavana Enmul h/f Adv V.R.Gupta & Associates, for plaintiff. None for defendant Coram : Shri.U. C. Deshmukh. C.R. No.: 59. Date : 19/10/2023 ORAL ORDER This Notice of Motion is moved by the plaintiff to restore the suit dismissed in default on 17.02.2018. -- 1 of 4 -- Order on Notice of Motion No. 1492 of 2018 3. It is contention of the plaintiff that his advocate had appeared in the matter lastly on 20.01.2018. He wrongly heard next date given by the Court. Hence, he could not appear before the Court on the date of the impugned order. Hence, impugned order is passed. 4. It is specific contention of the plaintiff that due wrong entry taken by the advocate to his diary, there was no presence of the plaintiff before the Court. The plaintiff did not absent deliberately, but due to aforesaid reasons which is liable to be condoned and accepted. Hence, prayed to allow Notice of Motion. 5. The defendant failed to appear and file say. Hence Notice of Motion is proceeded without say of the defendant. 6. In support of the Notice of Motion, the plaintiff has filed copy of diary of concerned advocate, wherein the date of the hearing pertaining to the matter is shown to be listed on 17th March, 2018. As defendant failed to file reply, there is no reason to disbelieve the case of the plaintiff at the first site. However, it significant to note that suit was instituted on 3rd September, 2014. Thereafter, the defendant filed written statement. Issues were framed on 10th February, 2015. The record of the suit shows that the plaintiff was absent on many dates of the hearing. On the contrary, the defendant was present. It shows that the plaintiff was not diligent in conducting the suit. It is submission of Ld. advocate for the plaintiff if Notice of Motion is not allowed he is the plaintiff who will suffer irreparable loss. The suit was instituted for recovery of an amount of Rs.3,88,162/- which prima facie indicates that the plaintiff has pecuniary interest in the matter. -- 2 of 4 -- Order on Notice of Motion No. 1492 of 2018 7. To decide the matter on merit, it would be just and proper to allow the Notice of Motion. 8. Simultaneously, it is apt to mention that the plaintiff did not appear on most of the dates of hearing. The defendant had appeared. The suit was instituted in the year 2013. The plaintiff claims interest over the suit amount. In such circumstances, if the suit is restored and decreed with interest, then he is the defendant who will have face undue loss. In such case, Notice of Motion ensue considerable cost and necessary direction in the interest of justice as follows, : ORDER 1. Notice of Motion No. 1492 of 2018 is allowed subject to cost of Rs. 10,000/- payable within two month of the Order. 2. On payment of aforesaid cost, it be credited to the DLSA, Mumbai, a the suit be restored to its original stage. 3. Both parties to note that no interest will be levied on the decreetal amount if the suit is decreed and interest is awarded from the date of the suit to the date on which the plaintiff will file or adduce documentary or oral evidence before the Court as cost of this Notice of Motion. 4. Notice of Motion No. 1492 of 2018 is disposed off accordingly. (Dictated and Pronounced in Open Court) (U.C.Deshmukh) Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court Date.:19.10.2023 Greater Bombay (CR 59). Declared on : 19.10.2023 Dictated on : 19.10.2023 Transcribed on : 31.10.2023 Checked on : 02.11.2023 Signed on : -- 3 of 4 -- Order on Notice of Motion No. 1492 of 2018 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 22.11.2022 at 5.00 -p.m. Mrs. P.R.Wagh UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (with Court Room No.) HHJ SHRI.U.C.Deshmukh,(C.R.No.59) Judge.,City Civil & Sessions Court, Date of pronouncement of /Order 19.10.2023 Order signed by P.O. on 06.11.2023 order uploaded on 22.11.2023 -- 4 of 4 --
