Skip to main content
Court Order

Interim Order 2

CNR MHCC01004659201814 Jul 2025
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Interim Order 2 · 14 Jul 2025 · CNR MHCC010046592018

Order Details: Order below exhibit
Pdf Text: Order Below Exh.15 -: 1 :- CS No.377 of 2021
MHCC010046592018
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MAZGAON, BOMBAY
ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT NO.15
IN
COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 377 of 2021
M/s. Cravatex Ltd … Plaintiff.
V/s.
Panchanan Retail Products
Pvt Ltd & Ors. … Defendants.
CORAM: HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SHRI A. S. KAZI
(COURT ROOM NO.14)
DATE : 14.07.2025.
-: Appearances: -
Adv. Anil Lulla for the plaintiff.
Adv. Sajid Sayyed h/f. Adv. Rahul Agarwal for the Defendant No.3.
[
ORAL ORDER
The present application is filed by the Defendant No.3 for
delivery of interrogatories to the Plaintiff under Order XI Rule 4 of the
Civil Procedure Code.
2) After hearing both the sides as length and on perusal of the
interrogatories delivered to the Plaintiff by the Defendant No.3, I find
-- 1 of 3 --
Order Below Exh.15 -: 2 :- CS No.377 of 2021
that, instead of adhering to the case management hearing, the
defendant No.3 has delivered these interrogatories to the Plaintiff at the
stage of trial and all the questions raised therein are in the nature of
cross-examination for instance, he has asked question about the
Distributorship Agreement, which could be asked in cross-examination.
He has mentioned interrogatories No.9 for asking the question,
“whether the plaintiff has any documentary evidence to show that the
defendant No. was in-charge and was also responsible for day-to-day
affairs and management and business of M/s. Panchanam Ratail
Products Pvt. Ltd. Similarly other questions are asked regarding the suit
invoices. All the said are more in the nature of cross-examination and
can only be answered by the Plaintiff at the trial of the suit. The issues
are already framed, moreover the evidence of the PW-01 is also filed on
11.06.2024 and 22.07.2024. Hence, no useful purpose will be served by
allowing the interrogatories. Hence, I proceed to pass the following
order:-
ORDER
1. Application Exh.15 is hereby rejected.
2. No order as to costs.
3. Application Exh.15 stands disposed off accordingly.
( A. S. KAZI)
Addl. District Judge,
City Civil & Sessions Court,
Date:.14.07.2025 . Mazgaon, Gr. Mumbai
(C. R. No.14)
Direct Typed on : 14.07.2025
Signed on : 14.07.2025
-- 2 of 3 --
Order Below Exh.15 -: 3 :- CS No.377 of 2021
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
UPLOAD DATE: 14.07.2025 NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
TIME: 04.30 p.m. Mr. Ashok Sudhakar Patil
Name of the Judge (With Court
room no.)
HHJ Shri. A. S. Kazi
(Court Room No.14)
Date of Pronouncement of
JUDGEMENT/ORDER
14.07.2025
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P. O.
on
14.07.2025
JUDGEMENT/ORDER uploaded on 14.07.2025
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.