SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Mr. Jitendra Nemichand BafnaVsM/s. Victoria Iron and Metal Warehousing Pvt. Ltd.
CNR MHCC0100464720192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--CONSENT DECREE
Decision Date: 03rd December 2019
TrustJury record updated 20 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 101196/2019
- Registration Date
- 03 May 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec Order 39
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 21-06-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for Plaintiff present.
Ex.2 Adv. Viraj Bansod filed V/n for defendant t.o.r.
Draft NM filed by Adv for Plaintiff t.o.r.
Leave is granted to register it.
Copy is given to other side.
Defendant is directed to file WS within prescribed period.
Adj for NM reply and WS to 13.08.2019.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 08-07-2019
Date: 08-07-2019
Business: By Precipe.
Adv. Patil for Plaintiff present.
He filed common pursis for placing this matter and nine other matters before Lok Adalalt t.o.r.
Hence, matter be referred to Lok Adalat.
Adv for Plaintiff submitted that he will intimate other party to remain present before Lok Adalat on 13.07.2019.
Already adj to 13.08.2019.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2019
Date: 13-08-2019
Business: Adv. Pooja Jain for Plaintiff present.
Deft and Adv absent.
Adj for reply as last chance to 21.09.2019.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2019
Date: 21-09-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present
Adv. Viraj Bansode for defendant present.
With concerned with both parties.
Matter is adjd. NM reply to 5.10.2019.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2019
Date: 05-10-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Saurav Uttangale for defendant present.
As court is busy in passing judgment.
Adjd. to 7.11.2019 for NM reply
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2019
Date: 07-11-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
Adv. Saurabh Utangale for defendant present.
Adjourned for NM Reply to 29.11.2019.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2019
Date: 29-11-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
Adv. Saurav Utangale for defendant present.
Adjourned for consent term to 3.12.2019
Next Purpose: CONSENT TERM
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2019
Date: 03-12-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
Adv. Saurav Uttangale I/b Adv. Tushar Goradia for defendant present.
Plaintiff present.
Mr. Rahul Ramesh Shah director of defendant present.
Ex 3 Consent Term filed by both parties.
Verified plaintiff and director of defendant Rahul Ramesh Shah.
They voluntarily agree terms contained in Exh.3. I perused Exh.3 para 2 to 4 of the same state about background history of litigation which cannot form part of Consent Decree, so I exclude those terms while passing order.
Hence, pass following order
ORDER BELOW Exh.1
1. Suit is decreed in terms para 1, 5 to 34 of Consent terms Exh.3.
2. Court fee if any as per Rule be refunded to the plaintiffs.
3. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
4. In above terms suit stands disposed of.
Plaintiff is directed to file register NM on record.
Adjourned to 4.12.2019 for compliance.
Nature Of Disposal: CONSENT DECREE
Disposal Date: 03-12-2019Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 105101/2019 Filing Date: 24-04-2019 First Hearing Date: 21st June 2019 Decision Date: 03rd December 2019 Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 103 Dec 2019
03 Dec 2019
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 3.12.2019 SU 1196/19 NM 2508/19 Ex 3 CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02) Adv. Patil for plaintiff present. Adv. Saurav Uttangale I/b Adv. Tushar Goradia for defendant present. Plaintiff present. Mr. Rahul Ramesh Shah director of defendant present. Ex 3 Consent Term filed by both parties. Verified plaintiff and director of defendant Rahul Ramesh Shah. They voluntarily agree terms contained in Exh.3. I perused Exh.3 para 2 to 4 of the same state about background history of litigation which cannot form part of Consent Decree, so I exclude those terms while passing order. Hence, pass following order: ORDER BELOW Exh.1 1. Suit is decreed in terms para 1, 5 to 34 of Consent terms Exh.3. 2. Court fee if any as per Rule be refunded to the plaintiffs. 3. Decree be drawn up accordingly. 4. In above terms suit stands disposed of. Plaintiff is directed to file register NM on record. Adjourned to 4.12.2019 for compliance. Judge -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
