Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Amar Pratik Builders (I) Pvt. Ltd.VsUrmila Kanjibhai Patel And Ors

CNR MHCC01004629201914-COURT 14 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 04th June 2019

TrustJury record updated 20 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100902/2019
Registration Date
26 Apr 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Amar Pratik Builders (I) Pvt. Ltd.

    Respondent

    1. 1Urmila Kanjibhai Patel And Ors

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 04-06-2019
Business: Adv. Ms. Anita Trivedi for Plaintiff Present and tendered original Ch/su 902/19 is t.o.r. Defendant no. 1(e) in person Present. Copy of Ch/su 902/19 supplied to defendant no. 1(e). He submitted that, as per Roznama dtd. 18/02/2014 name of defendant no. 1 (a) was allowed to delete so this ch/su is not maintainable. The Plaintiff advocate after seeing Roznama dtd. 18/02/2014 fairly admitted that, order of deleting name of defendant no. 1(a) was passed on 18/02/2014, so she do not want to press this ch/su , however she submitted that, as per Roznama dtd. 18/02/2014 Name of defendant no. 1(a) is not deleted from Plaint. So she may be allowed to delete name of defendant no. 1 (a) by making necessary amendment. Order on Ch/su 902/19 After going through Roznama it shows that, as per order on 18/02/2014 on plaintiffs application Exh. 3 name of defendant no. 1(a) was allowed to delete from Plaint. There is no consequential amendment to that effect, so this present ch/su is disposed off. However, in the interest of justice Plaintiff is allowed to delete the name of the defendant no. 1 (a) by making necessary amendment in Plaint within three days.
Adjd to 07/06/2019 for Compliance
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 04-06-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 104383/2019
Filing Date: 26-04-2019
First Hearing Date: 04th June 2019
Decision Date: 04th June 2019
Court Number And Judge: 14-COURT 14  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    04 Jun 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Adv. Ms. Anita Trivedi for Plaintiff Present and tendered original Ch/su 902/19 is t.o.r.
Defendant no. 1(e) in person Present. Copy of Ch/su 902/19 supplied to defendant no. 1(e).
He submitted that, as per Roznama dtd. 18/02/2014 name of defendant no. 1 (a) was
allowed to so this ch/su is not maintainable. The Plaintiff advocate after seeing Roznama
dtd. 18/02/2014 fairly admitted that, order of deleting name of defendant no. 1(a) was
passed on 18/02/2014, so she do not want to press this ch/su , however she submitted that,
as per Roznama dtd. 18/02/2014 Name of defendant no. 1(a) is not deleted from Plaint. So
she may be allowed to name of defendant no. 1 (a) by making necessary amendment. Order
on Ch/su 902/19 After going through Roznama it shows that, as per order on 18/02/2014 on
plaintiffs application Exh. 3 name of defendant no. 1(a) was allowed to from Plaint. There is
no consequential amendment to that effect, so this present ch/su is disposed off. However, in
the interest of justice Plaintiff is allowed to the name of the defendant no. 1 (a) by making
necessary amendment in Plaint within three days.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.