Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mrs. Neeta Sampat NalawadeVsM/s. Halkara Builders And Ors

CNR MHCC0100462520192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 27th June 2019

TrustJury record updated 20 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101687/2019
Registration Date
26 Apr 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 27-06-2019
Business: Adv. Upadhyay for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Kekane for defendant present.
Deft tendered original NM No.1687/19 t.o.r.
Order below NM No.1687/19.
Read Notice of motion, affidavit in support of it, reply of Plaintiff.
Notice of motion is taken out by defendant no.2 seeking condonation of delay caused in filing of written statement and taking written statement on record. It is the contention of defendant no.2 that he has sought inspection of documents referred to and relied upon by Plaintiff in plaint vide request letters dtd.21.01.2019 and 22.02.2019 addressed to Advocate for Plaintiff. However, Plaintiff avoided to give inspection of documents to defendant no.2. Therefore, he could not file written statement within prescribed period. He has annexed letters referred above.
On the other hand Plaintiff opposed notice of motion on the count that no reason is mentioned to condone delay caused in filing of written statement.
It is a settled law that Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC is not mandatory and in specific circumstances the WS can be accepted with reasons. It is also held that in an adversarial system, no party should be denied an opportunity in participation of the justice dispensation system (Salem Bar Association V/s Union of India (2003 AIR SCC 189) and Zolba V/s Keshav (2008 AIR SCC 2099)
Keeping in view above legal position, considering reason assigned by defendant no.2, in order to give an opportunity to the defendant no.2 to contest matter on merit and that delay caused is not deliberate and inordinate, I am inclined to condone delay caused in filing of written statement and permit defendant no.2 to file written statement. However, considering the conduct of defendant no.2, it is necessary to impose certain costs upon him. Hence, pass following order.
ORDER
1. Notice of Motion No.1687/19 is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- to the Plaintiff within period of one week. Defendant no.2 is at liberty to deposit costs payable to the Plaintiff in Court.
2. On payment of costs by the defendant no.2, written statement be taken on record.
3. Accordingly, NM No.1687/19 is disposed off.
Costs is paid by Adv for defendant no.2 to Adv for Plaintiff in open Court.
Ex.4 Written statement filed by defendant no.2 t.o.r.
Copy of WS given to the Plaintiff.
Adj for NM hearing of NM 4420/18 to 31.07.2019.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 27-06-2019

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 104563/2019
Filing Date: 26-04-2019
First Hearing Date: 27th June 2019
Decision Date: 27th June 2019
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
27 Jun 2019

Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 27.06.2019 SU 2781/18 @ NM 1687/19 @ NM 4420/18 Exh.4 CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02) Adv. Upadhyay for Plaintiff present. Adv. Kekane for defendant present. Deft tendered original NM No.1687/19 t.o.r. Order below NM No.1687/19. Read Notice of motion, affidavit in support of it, reply of Plaintiff. Notice of motion is taken out by defendant no.2 seeking condonation of delay caused in filing of written statement and taking written statement on record.…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.