Final Order 1

Order Details: Chamber summons
Pdf Text: Adv Ms. Mehrotra for plaintiff present and filed register ch/sum no.666/18 alongwith
affidavit t.o.r. None for defendant. KB for order. LO Plaintiff filed ch/sum for necessary
amendment and issue fresh summons upon defendant no.2. Plaintiff submits that Yashashri
Engineering of property firm of one Bharanle. One more firm by same name also exist of
which Manoj Goyal is the proprietor. At the time of transaction Sunil Bharale representative
of plaintiff that Manoj Goyal is the proprietor. Therefore in the present case plaintiff made
Mr. Manoj Goyal as the defendant no.2 as the proprietor of defendant no.1 Yashashri
Engineering. Mr. Manoj Goyal i.e. defendant no.2 in negotiable proceeding node and
application pointed out that he is not the person who has issued the cheque, at that time
plaintiff realised that in reality defendant no.1 company should be representative through
Sunil Bharale and not by Manoj Goyal therefore they filed present ch/sum. As the Manoj
Goyal is not the proprietor of defendant no.1 with whom the plaintiff has commercial
transaction in respect of present suit, in reality it is the Sunil Bharale hence it is necessary
to carry out said amendment. Hence I proceed to pass following order ORDER 1. Ch/sum
no.666/18 is allowed. 2. Plaintiff to carry out amendment as per rules.
-- 1 of 1 --