Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

M/s. Venus Rubber WorksVsMCGM +1 more

CNR MHCC0100444720205-COURT 05 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 07th December 2020

TrustJury record updated 29 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101465/2020
Registration Date
15 Oct 2020

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

3

Acts & Sections

1
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 21-10-2020
Business: Adv Krishna Holambe Patil for plaintiff present.
Adv Suryawanshi for MCGM/defendant No.1 present.
Defendant No.2 absent when called.
Defendant No.1 submitted draft NM @ affidavit O: Leave granted to register N/M.
Defendant No.1 produced photographs and documents alongwith list.
Adv of defendant made statement that plaintiff and defendant No.2 are served.
Matter adjourned for reply to 04/11/2020.
Later on
Defendant No.2 present and admitted service of NM filed by defendant No.1.
He submitted that he is not going to file reply to NM of defendant No.1 and his earlier reply of NM of plaintiff be treated as his reply to this NM, noted.
Later on
Adv. Mr Yadav on behalf of BMC present.
Matter adjourned for NM reply to 04/11/2020.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 04-11-2020

Date: 04-11-2020
Business: Adv Krishna Holambe Patil for plaintiff present.
Adv Suryawanshi for MCGM/defendant no.1 present.
Defendant No.2 absent.
Adv of plaintiff submitted adjournment application for filing reply on Notice of Motion of BMC.
Admittedly there is no stay of Hon\''ble High Court for license cancellation proceeding. General guidelines during COVID-19 are regarding only eviction and demolition etc.
In view of grounds mentioned in the application and considering nature of the suit last chance is given to plaintiff to file reply on NM of defendant no.1. Plaintiff to avoid delay.
Matter adjourned for reply on NM to 12.11.2020 at 11.00 am.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 12-11-2020

Date: 12-11-2020
Business: Adv Krishna Holambe-Patil for plaintiff present.
Adv Nandanwar for MCGM/defendant present.
Adv of plaintiff filed affidavit reply in NM No.1465/2020. Copy served to other side.
Matter adjourned for NM arguments to 04.12.2020.
LO at 11.35 pm.
Defendant No.2 in person present.
Matter adjourned for NM arguments to 04.12.2020.
Next Purpose: NM  ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2020

Date: 04-12-2020
Business: Adv Holambepatil present for plaintiff.
Adv Rajan Yadav alongwith Adv Suryawanshi present for defendant no.1.
Defendant no.2 in person present.
Heard arguments advanced by Ld. Adv of plaintiff, Adv of defendant no.1 and defendant no.2 in person.
Matter adjourned for Order on NM No.1465/2020 to 07.12.2020.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 07-12-2020

Date: 07-12-2020
Business: Adv Sandip Gaikwad (h/f Adv Holambepatil) present for plaintiff.
Adv Rajan Yadav alongwith Adv Suryawanshi present for MCGM/defendant no.1.
Defendant no.2 in person absent.
F.R.S.R. Following order is passed below NM No.1465/2020-
ORDER
1.Notice of Motion No.1465 of 2020 stands dismissed and disposed of with liberty to file afresh after disposal of w.p. No.13068/19 if required, subject to provisions of law.
2.Plaintiff shall take care that no any untoward incident occurs in the said shop due to his goods, otherwise he shall be held responsible in that regard.
3.Keep suit for written statement (if any).
4.Parties to avoid delay in the main suit.
Matter adjourned for WS to 20.01.2021.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 07-12-2020

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 104867/2020
Filing Date: 15-10-2020
First Hearing Date: 21st October 2020
Decision Date: 07th December 2020
Court Number And Judge: 5-COURT 05  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
07 Dec 2020

Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 NM No.1465-2020 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER MUMBAI NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1465 OF 2020 in L.C. SUIT NO.402 OF 2018 MCGM ]...Applicant i.e. original defendant No.1 Versus M/s. Venus Rubber Works ]..Non applicant i.e. original plaintiff Appearance: Advocate Mr. Rajan Yadav for the applicant i.e. MCGM. Advocate Mr. Holambe Patil for Non applicant i.e. plaintiff. Non applicant No.2 means original defendant No.2 in person. CORAM : S.C. Pathare, Judge…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.