Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

Akshar Rameshkumar Jain Summ. Suit No. 1032 of 2016VsSudhakar Sakharam Tirlotkar and Anr.

CNR MHCC010044422019966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 15th October 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100141/2017
Registration Date
23 Mar 2017

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec NOTICE

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 24-04-2019
    Business: Shri. R.B. Shah, C.A. of plaintiff present. Exe.application marked as Exh.A(Colly). Shri. Shah prays for issue of warrant u/o.XXI Rule 46 of CPC, stating that warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC has already issued on 29/04/2017 and has tendered the application to that effect, taken on record and marked as Exh.B. He has also tendered original warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC, duly served upon the employer of the defendant, taken on record and marked as Exh.C. Upon hearing Shri. Shah and upon perusing the application, issue warrant as prayed for, returnable on 24/09/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 24-09-2019
    
    Date: 24-09-2019
    Business: Parties and Advocate absent. As Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 15/10/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 15-10-2019
    
    Date: 15-10-2019
    Business: Shri. R.B. Shah, C.A. of plaintiff present. Letter recived from Adiminstrative officer, Transport(City), BMC, Mumbai under this officer Marathi inward no. 1677 date 03/07/2019, taken on record marked as Exh-D. Shri. Shah states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 46 in the matter has been issued on 30/04/2019 and served upon the garnishee of the defendant, appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 15-10-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 105009/2019
    Filing Date: 23-03-2017
    First Hearing Date: 24th April 2019
    Decision Date: 15th October 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.