Skip to main content
MISC APPEAL

Arun Laxman KachareVsMCGM

CNR MHCC0100442720194-COURT 04 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 25th June 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100137/2019
Registration Date
26 Apr 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Terrorist and Disruptive and Activities (Prevention) Act · Sec 105F

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 26-04-2019
    Business: Adv for appellant present.
    Adv for respondent present.
    As court time is over On request of appellant,Matter is adjd. to.03.05.2019  for hearing.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 03-05-2019
    
    Date: 03-05-2019
    Business: Adv. for appellant present has filed stay application TOR and marked as Exh.2
    Adv. for respondent present.
    Order below Stay Application
    Exhibit-2
    Heard the learned Advocate of the appellant as well as the learned Advocate of the respondent. The learned Advocate of the appellant submits that the agreement of leave and license between the parties is not terminated and it is in course, in view of clause (6) of the leave and license agreement. It is also submitted that the Municipal Corporation has not supplied the copy of order by which the Corporation has taken possession not to continue the leave and license agreement. Therefore, it is submitted that he has prima facie case.
    The learned Advocate of the respondent has opposed these grounds strongly.
    Both the parties have submitted that in similar matters, the Hon\''ble High Court has granted stay with direction to decide those matters within time prescribed by the Hon\''ble High Court i.e. on or before 15.06.2019. Considering these circumstances, both the parties submitted that they have no objection, if this appeal is decide alongwith the said bunch of appeals, within the aforesaid time prescribed by the Hon\''ble High Court. It appears that in similar matters, this Court has refused to grant interim stay to the impugned order, but in Writ Petitions 5293/2019 to 5309/2019, by order dated 25.04.2019, the Hon\''ble High Court has impugned in those appears with direction that those appeals to be decided on or before 15.06.2019. In view of this, the instant appeal may also be decided alongwith those connected appears No.114/2019 to 130/2019 and in the meanwhile, the respondent may be directed not to implement the impugned order coercively till 15.06.2019. The parties have no objection to clear the instant appeal for final disposal alongwith the said bunch of appeal No.114/2019 to 130/2019. Accordingly, by consent of the parties, the instant appeal is adjourned to 07.06.2019 for being heard for final disposal. In the meanwhile, the respondent is directed not to implement the impugned order coercively.
    Adv. of responded has filed original R and P of  the inquiry held by the competent authority. t.o.r copy supplied to the adv of appellant.
    Matter is adjd. to.07.06.2019  for hearing the appeal or final disposal
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 07-06-2019
    
    Date: 07-06-2019
    Business: Adv Gosavi for appellant present.
    Adv A. V. Diwte for Respondent present.
    Matter is adjd. to.10/06/2019  for Hearing.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 10-06-2019
    
    Date: 10-06-2019
    Business: Adv Gosavi for appellant present.
    Adv A. V. Diwte for Respondent present.
    Matter is adjd. to.12/06/2019  for Hearing.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2019
    
    Date: 12-06-2019
    Business: Adv. Ajit Hodage a/w Hemal Patel i/b Akshay Gosavi for appellants present.
    Adv. for respondent present.
    Matter is adjd. to.13/06/2019  for Hearing.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 13-06-2019
    
    Date: 13-06-2019
    Business: Adv. Ajit Hodage a/w Hemal Patel i/b Akshay Gosavi for appellants present.
    Adv. for respondent present.
    Matter is adjd. to.14/06/2019  for Hearing.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 14-06-2019
    
    Date: 14-06-2019
    Business: Adv. Ajit Hodage a/w Hemal Patel i/b Akshay Gosavi for appellants present.
    Adv. Diwte for respondent present.
    Heard advocate for appellant.
    Matter is adjd. to. 15/06/2019 for Hearing the arguments of the respondents.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2019
    
    Date: 15-06-2019
    Business: Adv. Ajit Hodage a/w Hemal Patel i/b Akshay Gosavi for appellants present.
    Adv. Diwte for respondent present.
    Heard advocate for respondent partly.
    KB
    Later On. At 3.15 pm.
    Same Appearance.
    Heard advocate for respondent, partly.
    As court time is over, matter adjd to 17/06/2019 for Hearing.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2019
    
    Date: 17-06-2019
    Business: Adv. Ajit Hodage a/w Hemal Patel i/b Akshay Gosavi for appellants present.
    Adv. Diwte for respondent present.
    Heard advocate for respondent partly.
    KB
    Later On. At 3.15 pm.
    Same Appearance.
    Heard advocate for respondent, partly.
    As court time is over, matter adjd to 18/06/2019 for Hearing.
    Next Purpose: HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 18-06-2019
    
    Date: 18-06-2019
    Business: Adv. Ajit Hodage a/w Hemal Patel i/b Akshay Gosavi for appellants present.
    Adv. Diwte for respondent present.
    Heard the argument of ld advocate for respondent, which is completed. As it is recess time matter is kb in afternoon.
    KB.
    Later On. At 3.15 pm.
    Same appearance.
    Heard rejoinder argument of the ld advocate of the appellant.
    The arguments are concluded. Hence matter is adj for Judgment to 25.06.2019.
    Next Purpose: JUDGMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 25-06-2019
    
    Date: 25-06-2019
    Business: Adv. Ajit Hodage i/b Akshay Gosavi for appellant present.
    Adv. Diwte for respondent present.
    Judgment vide Exh. 3 is pronouncement in the open court and following order is passed-
    -O R D E R-
    1.The Miscellaneous Appeal No.137 of 2019 is allowed as under-
    (i) The impugned order dated 15.03.2019 and the impugned notice dated 15.03.2019 issued by the Enquiry Officer under section 105-B of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act is set aside.
    (ii)The application made by the Corporation to the Enquiry Officer under section 105-B of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act is rejected.
    (iii)Parties to bear their own costs.
    (iv)Record and Proceedings of the enquiry be sent back to the Enquiry Officer.
    2. In these terms, the appeal stands disposed off accordingly.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 25-06-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 104931/2019
    Filing Date: 22-04-2019
    First Hearing Date: 26th April 2019
    Decision Date: 25th June 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 4-COURT 04 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    25 Jun 2019

    Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: Presented on 22/04/2019 Registered on 26/04/2019 Decided on 25/06/2019 Duration Yrs. M. Days 00 02 00 CNR No. MHCC010044272019 EXH.3 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO. 137 OF 2019 IN ENQUIRY NO. A/08/MKT OF 2017 Arun Laxman Kachare, Shop No.17, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus Subway, Mumbai – 400 001. ...Appellant. V/s. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, having office at Municipal Head Offices, Mahapalika Bhavan, Mahapalika Marg, Fort,…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.