Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mr.Indramani Gangaprasad VarmaVsMr.Pappu Ramjit Varma

CNR MHCC0100441620199-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 21st January 2020

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101628/2019
Registration Date
22 Apr 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 22-04-2019
Business: Matter adj. for Compliance and NM Hearing to 20.06.2019.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2019

Date: 20-06-2019
Business: Adv. Varma alongwith plaintiff present.
Adv.Varma submits that he will verify the fact that whether R and P of this suit is sent from CR 3 to this court or not.
Defendant Rajendraprasad Varma present. His adv. Absent.
Case is adjourned for ch/s and n/m hearing to  21.08.2019
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2019

Date: 21-08-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Nikhil Varma @ Plaintiff present
Defendant no.2(d) present and submitted that his advocate has not come to the court.
Notice of Motion no.1629/19 is filed in the Court on 24/09/2018 and Notice of Motion no.1628/19 is filed on 28/09/2018.  Roznamas dated 25/02/2019, 22/04/2019 and 20/06/2019 show that advocate for Defendant remained absent and today also advocate for Defendants is not present, in such circumstances, it is made clear that if on next date, Defendants will not argue both Notice of Motions court will be compelled to disposed them off.
As requested by Defendant no.2(d), case is adjourned to 16/10/2019 for hearing of NM no.1628/19 and 1629/19.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2019

Date: 16-10-2019
Business: Advocate Nikhil Varma h/f Adv. Raju Singh for Plaintiff present
Advocate A. R. Khanna for Defendants present
Heard arguments in respect of NM no.1628/19 and 1629/19.
Defendants advocate submitted that copy of amended plaint was not served upon Defendants personally however Defendants are intending to contest the suit therefore fair opportunity is necessary to be given to Defendants.
Plaintiffs advocate vehemently argued and submitted that Defendants have intentionally avoided the service of copies of amended plaint, hence the envelopes sent to them by post returned unclaimed, hence NMs are necessary to be dismissed.
Defendants advocate are directed to file copy of power of attorney executed by  Defendant no.1A to 1C in favour of Defendant no.2D.
Defendants advocate submitted that cost was awarded against deceased Defendant and previous NM is pending for reducing said cost amount, said NM is also necessary to be made absolute.
Plaintiffs advocate also opposed previous NM.
Case is adjourned to 06/11/2019 for Order on NM no.1628/19 and 1629/19.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 06-11-2019

Date: 06-11-2019
Business: Advocate for Plaintiff present
None present for Defendant.
Court is busy in dictating Judgment in suit no.785/08, hence case is adjourned to 10/01/2020 for Order on Notice of Motion.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 10-01-2020

Date: 10-01-2020
Business: Plaintiff present.
Defendant no.2E present.
Court is busy in dictating Judgment in suit no.7988/98, hence case is adjourned to 21/01/2020 for Order on Notice of Motion.
Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 21-01-2020

Date: 21-01-2020
Business: Adv. Shri. Nikhil Verma for Plaintiff present.
Defendant Ravindra Verma present.
Advocate for defendant is absent.
F.R.S.R. following order has passed-
                           ORDER ON NM NO.1628/19
1. Notice of Motion no.1628 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b), subject to cost of Rs.2500/- to be paid by the Defendant nos.2(a) to 2(e) to Plaintiff.
2. Defendant nos.2(a) to 2(e) are directed, if previously any order directing them to pay the costs is passed by the Court, they should comply said order as well as they should pay this costs amount in addition to previously additional costs.
                       ORDER ON NM NO.1629/19
1. Notice of Motion no.1629 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b), subject to cost of Rs.2500/- to be paid by the Defendant nos.2(a) to 2(e) to Plaintiff.
2. Defendant nos.2(a) to 2(e) are directed, if previously any order directing them to pay the costs is passed by the Court, they should comply said order as well as they should pay this costs amount in addition to previously additional costs.
Case is adjourned to 16/03/2020 for paying cost amount/compliance by defendant nos. 2(a) to 2(e).
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 21-01-2020

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 104913/2019
Filing Date: 22-04-2019
First Hearing Date: 22nd April 2019
Decision Date: 21st January 2020
Court Number And Judge: 9-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
21 Jan 2020

Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :COURT 9 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0101628/2019 Mr.Indramani Gangaprasad Varma Vs Mr.Pappu Ramjit Varma Date : 21-01-2020 Business : Adv. Shri. Nikhil Verma for Plaintiff present. Defendant Ravindra Verma present. Advocate for defendant is absent. F.R.S.R. following order has passed- ORDER ON NM NO.1628/19 1. Notice of Motion no.1628 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b), subject to…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.