EXECUTION APPLN
M/s. Jyoti Overseas LimitedVsExpress Transport Pvt. Ltd. And Others
CNR MHCC010043912018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--WITHDRAWL
Decision Date: 08th February 2021
TrustJury record updated 11 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100085/2018
- Registration Date
- 02 Apr 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 03-05-2018 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik, Advocate for Plaintiff present. Ms. Mahadik prays for issue of Notice under order XXI Rule 22 of CPC. Hence issue Notice as prayed for returnable on 08/06/2018 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 08-06-2018 Date: 08-06-2018 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik I/b Rakesh G. Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Ms. Mahadik states that the notice has already been ordered to be issued, somehow, the same is not yet issued and on her request returnable date of notice is extended to 29/06/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 29-06-2018 Date: 29-06-2018 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik I/b Rakesh G. Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. For completing service adjd to 16/07/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 16-07-2018 Date: 16-07-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 01/08/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 01-08-2018 Date: 01-08-2018 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik I/b Rakesh G. Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. On request of Ms. Mahadik, adjd to 20/08/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 20-08-2018 Date: 20-08-2018 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik I/b Rakesh G. Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Mr. Vishal Raj, Advocate for Defendant No.1, present. Mr. Mahendrapratap Singh, Employee of M/s. New Golden Transport Co.- Defendant No.2, present. Execution Application marked as Exh.A (colly.). Ms. Mahadit tenders original notice u/o.XXI Rule 22 of C.P.C. alongwith service report endorsed thereon, same is t.o.r. and marked as Exh.B. Mr. Raj undertakes to file Vakalatnama. Ms. Mahadik undertakes to serve copy of E.A. upon the Defendants. Mr. Mahendrapratap Singh states that First Appeal No.559/2015 is preferred in the Hon\''ble Madhya Pradesh High Court. For the present, by consent, adjd to 29/09/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 29-09-2018 Date: 29-09-2018 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik I/b Rakesh G. Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Mr. Haresh Shivdasani, Advocate for Defendant No.2, present. Mr. Shivdasani undertakes to file Vakalatnama and reply by next date. Hence, by consent adjd to 01/12/2018. Later on Mr. Vishal Raj, Advocate for Defendant No.1, present. Mr. Raj has tendered Vakalatnama of Bimal Rajasekhar, Advocate for Defendant No.1, same is t.o.r. and marked as Exh.C. He is informed about the next date. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 01-12-2018 Date: 01-12-2018 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik I/b Rakesh G. Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Since, Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 08/01/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 08-01-2019 Date: 08-01-2019 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik, Advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Vishal Raj, Advocate for defendant no. 1 present. Shri. Raj seeks time to file reply . By consent adjourned to 12/02/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 12-02-2019 Date: 12-02-2019 Business: Miss. Rutuja Mahadik, advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Vishal Raj, advocate for judgement debtor no. 1 present. Shri. Haresh Shivdasani, advocate for judgement debtor no. 2 present. Shri. Shivdasani, has tendered Vakalatnama of judgement debtor no. 2, taken on record and marked as Exh. D. Shri. Shivdasani states that Honourable High Court has passed conditional stay order dt. 20/11/2018, in F.A. No. 559/2015. In view of the same, by consent adjourned to 25/04/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 25-04-2019 Date: 25-04-2019 Business: Shri. Haresh Shivdasani, advocate for the Defendant no.2 present. Other parties and advocate absent. Shri Shivdasani seeks adjournment in view of conditional stay order passed by the Honourable High Court and on his request, adjd to 29/08/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 29-08-2019 Date: 29-08-2019 Business: Shri. Harish Shivdasani, advocate for the defendant no.2 present. None for the Plaintiff. On request of Shri. Shivdasani, adjd to 05/10/2019, for reply. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2019 Date: 05-10-2019 Business: Shri. Haresh Shivdasani, advocate for the Defendant no.02 present. Shri. Shivdasani seeks time to file reply and on his request, adjd to 15/11/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 15-11-2019 Date: 15-11-2019 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik, advocate for the plaintiff present. Shri. Haresh Shivdasani, advocate for the defendant present. On request of both the advocates, on account of settlement, adjd to 06/12/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 06-12-2019 Date: 06-12-2019 Business: Shri. Haresh Shivdasani, advocate for the defendant present. None for the Plaintiff. On request of Shri. Shivdasani, as none appeared for the plaintiff, adjd to 12/12/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 12-12-2019 Date: 12-12-2019 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik, advocate for the plaintiff present. Shri. Kunal Naik, advocate for the defendant no.01 present. Shri. Haresh Shivdasani, advocate for the defendant no.02 present. As Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 23/01/2020. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 23-01-2020 Date: 23-01-2020 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik, advocate for the plaintiff present. On request of Ms. Mahadik, on account of settlement, adjd to 07/03/2020. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 07-03-2020 Date: 07-03-2020 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik Advocate for plaintiff present. Shri Haresh Shivdasani Advocate for defendant No.2 present. By consent on account of settlement matte adjourned to 23/04/2020. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2020 Date: 23-04-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 14-05-2020 Date: 14-05-2020 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 03-06-2020 Date: 03-06-2020 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2020 Date: 20-06-2020 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 16-07-2020 Date: 16-07-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 28-08-2020 Date: 28-08-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 18-09-2020 Date: 18-09-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 29-10-2020 Date: 29-10-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 16-12-2020 Date: 16-12-2020 Business: Parties and advocate are absent adjourned to 28/01/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2021 Date: 28-01-2021 Business: Ms. Rutuja Mahadik advocate for plaintiff present. Shri Ram Jain advocate for defendant No.1 present. Shri Haresh Shivdasani advocate for defendant No.2 present. Shri Shivdasani has tendered application to disposed off the exe.application in view of settlement between the parties t.o.r. and marked as Exh.E. Ms. Mahadik states that she has no instruction from her client and seeks short adjournment. Hence, on request of Ms. Mahadik matter adjourned to 08/02/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 08-02-2021 Date: 08-02-2021 Business: Shri R.R. Sharma advocate for plaintiff present. Shri Ram Jay advocate for defendant No.1 present. None for Defendant No.2. Shri Sharma advocate for plaintiff has tendered application for disposal of the matter stating that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties as full and final, t.o.r. and marked as Exh.F. Advocate for defendant No.1 has endorsed his no objection on the application to disposed of the matter. In view of this exe.application stands disposed off as settled out of Court. Nature Of Disposal: WITHDRAWL Disposal Date: 08-02-2021
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 101033/2018 Filing Date: 02-04-2018 First Hearing Date: 03rd May 2018 Decision Date: 08th February 2021 Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
