Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 24 Apr 2019 · CNR MHCC010043732019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 4082/2009 Resumed. The P.O. is busy in dictating judgment in suit No. 3235/2012. For want of time the board is discharged. Adjd for evidence of plaintiff to 03.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 4344/2007 Resumed. The P.O. is busy in dictating judgment in suit No. 3235/2012. For want of time the board is discharged. Adjd for cross examination of Def. no. 1(a) to 22.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 8972/2000 Resumed. Adv. Priyanka Bagat for plaintiff and Adv. V. K. Kandhari for defendant are present. The P.O. is busy in dictating judgment in suit No. 3235/2012. For want of time the board is discharged. Adjd for cross examination of PW no. 1 to 26.06.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 3016/2014 Resumed. Adv. Indira Bhushan for plaintiff is present. None for defendant. Adv. Bhushan submits that def. no. 1 is dead about the year ago and plaintiff will take necessary steps and therefore, the plaintiff is not pressing the application Exh. 4. Hence application Exh. 4 is filed. Adjd for steps against def. no. 1 to 10.07.2019. Judge 1 -- 1 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 4921/2011 Resumed. None for plaintiff. Adv. Anand for defendant nos. 1 to 3 is present. Absence of plaintiff is not explained. Adjd for passing dismissal orders to 11.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 3803/2013 Resumed. None for plaintiff. Adv. Asif Memon for defendant is present. Absence of plaintiff is not explained. Adjd for dismissal orders to 15.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 3431/2013 Resumed. None for plaintiff and defendant. Adjd for further evidence of plaintiff to 15.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 25/2018 Resumed. Adv. Kaustubh Patil with Adv. Prashant Kalvade for plaintiff is present. None for defendant. Adjd for written statement/no w.s. orders to 26.07.2019. Judge 2 -- 2 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 944/2019 Resumed. Adv. Nargis Khan for plaintiff is present. Exh. 1 - Plaint Exh. 2 - Vakalatnama. O- Seen and filed. Exh. 3 - Address Memo. O- R and R. Exh. 4 - List of documents. O - Seen and filed. Exh. 5 - Affidavit in support of plaint. Exh. 6 - Adv. Khan tendered original writ of summons. O- filed. Adv. Khan tendered draft NM with affidavit seeking appointment of Court Receiver High Court Bombay or some other person as receiver in respect of the suit property. Leave to register is granted. According to her copy of NM is already served on defendant. Exh. 7- Vakalatnama of Adv. Manoj Kane I/b Chandra Naik and Associates for defendants. O- Seen and filed. Adjd for NM reply to 19.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 23/2018 Resumed. Adv. Kaustubh Patil for plaintiff is present., kept back. L.O., at 11.50 a.m. Adv. Ritesh Jain I/b M. J. Juris for defendants seeks time to file w.s. on the ground that the talks of settlement inter se the parties failed. Time is granted as last chance with a direction to serve copy of w.s. in advance to the advocate for plaintiff. Adjd for written statement to 26.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 26/2018 Resumed. Adv. Kaustubh Patil with Adv. Prashant Kalvade for plaintiff is present. None for defendant. Adjd for written statement/no w.s. orders to 26.07.2019. Judge 3 -- 3 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 787/2013 Resumed. Adv. Vidya Korgaonkar for plaintiff is present. None for defendant. Adjd for reply on admissibility of documents to 16.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 4133/2013 Resumed. None for plaintiff and defendant. Adjd for reply on admissibility of documents to 17.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 2228/2014 Resumed. None for plaintiff and defendant. No steps are taken by the plaintiffs. Adjd for dismissal orders to 18.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 2461/2017 Resumed. None for plaintiff and defendant. The def. no. 1 has taken out NM seeking condonation of delay and leave to file w.s. The said NM is not yet registered and decided. Therefore, the def. no. 1 is directed to get the NM registered as early as possible failing which necessary orders will be passed in the matter. Adjd for NM reply/orders to 23.07.2019. L.O. at 4.30 p.m. Adv. Nikita More for plaintiff appeared. Adjd for NM reply/orders to 23.07.2019. Judge 4 -- 4 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 2313/2014 Resumed. None for plaintiff and defendant. Adjd for mediation report to 18.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 3518/2011 Resumed. Adv. Vidya Korgaonkar for plaintiff is present. Exh. 1 - Plaint Exh. 2 A - Vakalatnama . O- Seen and filed. Exh. 2 - Written statement of Defe. no. 1. O – R and R. Exh. 3 - Address Memo. O- R and R. Exh. 4 - List of documents. O - Seen and filed. Exh. 5 - Affidavit in support of plaint. Exh. 6 - Issues Adjd for witness list and evidence of plaintiff to 23.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 3235/2012 Exh. 17 Resumed. Adv. Juben Kanga h/f Adv. Anita Trivedi for plaintiff is present. None for defendants. FRSR the following order is passed- Exh.17 - Judgment ORDER 1. The suit is dismissed with costs. 2. Decree be drawn up accordingly. 3. The original documents, if any, filed by the plaintiff in this suit be returned to the plaintiff after the appeal period is over, upon making application, placing their copies for record and on proper identification. Judge 5 -- 5 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 672/2016 Resumed. Adv. Shashank Thatte for plaintiff and Adv. Nimesh Dharod h/f Adv. Chheda for defendants are present. Heard. Respective advocates on NM No. 3728/2018. The defendants are seeking condonation of delay of 59 days and further leave to file w.s. According to Ld. Advocate for defendant the defendant no. 1 was traveling and could not receive the writ of summons and thereafter due to Court vacations the w.s. could not be filed. The Ld. Advocate for plaintiff strongly opposed the NM by contending that in spite of the Ld. Advocate for defendant was appearing int eh matter the w.s was not filed and that the present NM has been taken out in order to delay the hearing and disposal of the suit. Considering the rival submissions, in view of the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Vimalkumar vs Vinodkumar reported in 1999 (1) Mh. L. J. 180 Rule 10 of Order VIII of C.P.C gives discretion to the Court and Court can permit to file w.s. at any stage prior to pronouncement of judgment. Therefore, the prejudice which may be caused to the plaintiff can be compensated in terms of costs. Thus the following order is passed- The NM no.3728/2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to payment of costs Rs. 3000/- to the plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today or to be deposited for that purpose in the Court within two weeks from today. Adjd for compliance to 03.05.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 3085/2013 Mentioned by pracipe. NOB. TOB. Adv. Rahul Singh h/f Adv. Rajesh Singh for defendant no. 2 tendered draft NM with affidavit seeking rejection of the plaint and stay of the suit. Leave to register is granted. He undertakes to serve the defendants. Adjd for NM reply to 30.04.2019. Judge 6 -- 6 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 2852/2018 Resumed. Adv. Prashant Nakti for plaintiff and Adv. Shetye for defendant no. 1 and 2 Adv. Ganesh for def. no. 3 to 7, Adv. Sanjay Joshi for def. Nos. 8 and 9 are present. All the Ld. Advocate submit that they will fix a time to give inspection of the document to each other. Adv. for plaintiff seeks time to file rejoinder. Adjd for NM hearing to 19.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 3101/2018 Resumed. None for plaintiff. Adv. Nakti for def. Nos. 1 to 4 and Adv. Dipali Gosavi for defendant nos. 5to 7 are present. Adv. Gosavi seeks time to file reply to NM. Time is granted as last chance. Adjd for NM reply to 19.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 3335/2011 Resumed. Adv. Sayali Gharpure for plaintiff and Adv. Kachare for defendant no. 1 are present. Adv. Gharpure seeks time to argue the NM. Time is granted as last chance. Adjd for NM arguments to 12.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 4972/2012 Resumed. Adv. Asif Nakhvi for plaintiff is present. Defendant in person is present. His advocate is absent. Defendant seeks time to argue the Ch/s. Time is granted as last chance with a direction that if defendant fail to argue necessary orders will be passed. Adjd for Ch/s arguments to 08.07.2019. Judge 7 -- 7 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 308/2019 Exh. 8 Resumed. Adv. Sheena Patil for plaintiff and Adv. Mr. Mamnia with def. Nos. 2 to 4 are present. Exh. 8 - Adv. Mamnia filed affidavit of service of NM No. 1609/2019. Adv. Patil tendered registered NM No. 1330/2019 with affidavit. Heard both the advocates on NM No. 1609/2019. The defendants are seeking condonation of delay of 12 days and further leave to file w.s. the Ld. Advocate for plaintiff, without prejudice to the rights of the plaintiff submitted that necessary orders may be passed in the matter. Considering the rival submissions, in view of the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Vimalkumar vs Vinodkumar reported in 1999 (1) Mh. L. J. 180 Rule 10 of Order VIII of C.P.C gives discretion to the Court and Court can permit to file w.s. at any stage prior to pronouncement of judgment. Therefore, the prejudice which may be caused to the plaintiff can be compensated in terms of costs. Thus the following order is passed- The NM no.1609/2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to payment of costs Rs. 2000/- to the plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today or to be deposited for that purpose in the Court within two weeks from today. Adv. Mamnia for defendants undertakes to tender registered NM in the Court before next date. Adjd for NM arguments and compliance to 10.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 1903/2012 Resumed. Adv. Harshil Panchal for plaintiff, Adv. Savardekar for defendant and Adv. Daiya for applicant are present. Adv. Panchal filed affidavit in reply to Ch/s. Copy served to the Adv. Daiya. Adv. Daiya undertakes to register the Ch/s before next date and tendered the copy of Ch/s with affidavit. Adjd for Ch/s arguments to 10.07.2019. Judge 8 -- 8 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 7581/1981 Resumed. Adv. Amin for plaintiff and Adv. Giriraj along with Adv. Anasamah Sayed i/b Bilwala and Co. for defendant no. 3 are present. None for remaining defendants. Heard, both the Ld. Advocates on NM No. 1310/2019. FRSR the following order is passed on NM No. 1310/2009. ORDER 1. The Notice of Motion No. 1310 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to payment of costs Rs. 2500/- paid to def. no. 3 or to be deposited for that purpose in the Court within a period of two weeks from today. Adjd for compliance and arguments on Ch/s No. 1005/2017 to 14.06.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 318/2019 Exh. 12 Resumed. Adv. Kunal Tiwari for plaintiff and Adv. J. P. Patel for defendant are present. Exh. 12 - Vakalatnama of Adv. Kunal Tiwari for plaintiff. O- Seen and filed. Adv. Tiwari filed affidavit in rejoinder. Copy is served on Adv. Patel. Adv. Tiwari tendered draft Ch/s with affidavit seeking amendment to the plaint. He undertakes to serve the proposed defendants with Ch/s before next date and submit affidavit of service. Copy of Ch/s is served on Adv. Patel. Leave to register is granted. Adv. Patel strongly objects to extend the earlier order. However considering the Ch/s, it is necessary to extend the earlier order till next date. Earlier order if any to continue till the next date. Adjd for Ch/s reply to 02.05.2019. Judge 9 -- 9 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 3186/2013 Resumed. Adv. Rajiv Hingu for plaintiff and Adv. Ms. Joglekar for defendant nos. 5 to 17 with Mr. Ketan Karani the secretary of the trust are present. Def. No. 14 in person is present. Adv. Joglekar submits that she is appearing on behalf of the def. Nos. 5 to 17. She seeks time to file w.s. for def. Nos. 16 (a) and (b) or adopt the w.s. which is already on record. Her statement is accepted and taken on record. Exh. 1 - Plaint Exh. 2 - Written statement of def. Exh. 2 A -Vakalatnama. O- Seen and filed. Exh. 3 - Address Memo. O- R and R. Exh. 4 - List of documents. O - Seen and filed. Exh. 5 - Affidavit in support of plaint. Exh. 6 - Vakalatnama of Adv. Gauri Joglekar for defendant nos. 5 to 17. O- seen and filed. Adjd for arguments on NM to 18.06.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 1135/2017 Mentioned by pracipe. NOB. TOB. Adv. Rahul Singh h/f Adv. Rajesh Singh for plaintiff tendered draft NM with affidavit seeking ad-interim relief to appoint Court Receiver High Court Bombay as receiver of suit property and further for restraining the defendants from disposing of the suit property and further furnish accounts etc. Leave to register is granted. He undertakes to serve the defendants. Adjd for NM reply to 03.07.2019. Judge 10 -- 10 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 2257/2018 Resumed. Adv. P.M. Bhansali for plaintiff and Adv. Paras Vira for defendant are present. Adv. Paras tendered registered NM No. 825/2019 with affidavit. Adv. Bhansali filed affidavit in reply. Copy served on Adv. Paras. Adv. Vira seeks time to file rejoinder if any. Time is granted as last chance with a direction to serve copy of rejoinder if any in advance to the advocate for plaintiff. Adjd for rejoinder if any and arguments to 24.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 7431/1996 (Disposed off) Resumed. None for plaintiff and defendant. Adv. Neha Pande for applicant seeks time to argue the NM. Time is granted as last chance. Adjd for NM arguments to 03.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Execution Appln. No. 242/2013 Resumed. Adv. Ruchita Desai for DH and Adv. Aditi Bhat for respondent in Ch/s are present. Both the advocates seeks time to argue the Ch/s. Time is granted as last chance. Adjd for Ch/s arguments to 23.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 945/2019 Resumed. None for plaintiff and defendant. Exh. 1 - Plaint Exh. 2 - Vakalatnama. O- Seen and filed. Exh. 3 - Address Memo. O- R and R. Exh. 4 - List of documents. O - Seen and filed. Exh. 5 - Affidavit in support of plaint. O- Issue writ of summons for settlement of issues to defendants. Adjd for report to 01.08.2019. Judge 11 -- 11 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 3890/2011 Resumed. None for plaintiff and defendant. Exh. 1 - Plaint Exh. 2 - Written statement of Defendant nos. 1 to 5. Exh. 2 A- Vakalatnama. O- Seen and filed. Exh. 3 - Address Memo. O- R and R. Exh. 4 - List of documents. O - Seen and filed. Exh. 5 - Affidavit in support of plaint. Exh. 6 - Issues. Adjd for witness list and evidence of plaintiff to 23.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 339/2014 Resumed. Adv. Ruby Warghat for plaintiff tendered draft issues. The P.O. is busy in dictating judgment in Suit no. 3235/2012. For want of time the board is discharged. Adjd for framing issues to 25.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 2617/2014 Resumed. The P.O. is busy in dictating judgment in Suit no. 3235/2012. For want of time the board is discharged. Adjd for framing issues to 25.07.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 721/2016 Resumed. The P.O. is busy in dictating judgment in Suit no. 3235/2012. For want of time the board is discharged. Adjd for framing issues to 29.07.2019. Judge 12 -- 12 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 581/2019 Mentioned by pracipe. NOB. TOB. Adv. Jaikar for plaintiff, Adv. Rupesh Ghadi for defendant no. 2 and defendant no. 1 in person are present. Exh. 1 - Plaint Exh. 2 - Vakalatnama. O- Seen and filed. Exh. 3 - Address Memo. O- R and R. Exh. 4 - List of documents. O - Seen and filed. Exh. 5 - Affidavit in support of plaint. Exh. 6 - Consent affidavit of defendant no. 1. Exh. 7 - Vakalatnama of Adv. Ghadi for defendant no. 2. Exh. 8 - Consent affidavit of defendant no. 2. Adjd for verification and submissions if any to 02.05.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 4695/2012 Exh. 23 Exh. 24 Exh. 25 Exh. 26 Sou Moto TOB. The Sheristedar brings to the notice of this Court that on 15.03.2019 while recording the cross examination of PW no. 1 three documents were referred to PW no. 1 by Adv. Pabari which were produced with list Exh. 23. However, the same are not recorded in roznama though the documents were marked with Exh. number during the cross examination and recorded in the deposition. Thus, in order to maintain proper record the following exh. are marked. Exh. 23 - List of documents. Exh. 24 - The pass book of account no. 7624 in Vina Nagar Branch, Bank of Baroda, Mulund. Exh. 25 - The pass book of account no. 2009712674-8 Bank of Maharashtra, Mulund. Exh. 26 - The pass book of account no. 20097194287 in M. G. Road, Mulund branch, Bank of Maharashtra, Mulund. Adjd for further cross examination of PW no.1 to 09.07.2019. Judge 13 -- 13 of 14 -- CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 12/04/2019 Roznama Execution Appln. No. 113/2018 Resumed. Adv. Priyanka Bagat for plaintiff and Adv. Retiwala for defendant are present. The P.O. is busy in hearing final arguments in Suit No. 9420/2000 and Suit No. 8152/2000 and dictating judgment in suit No. 6216/2005. For want of time the board is discharged. Adjd for hearing to 14.06.2019. Judge CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE SHRI M. S. DESHPANDE. (C.R. No. 01) 24/04/2019 Roznama Suit No. 672/2016 Resumed. Adv. Shashank Thatte for plaintiff and Adv. Nimesh Dharod h/f Adv. Chheda for defendants are present. Heard. Respective advocates on NM No. 3728/2018. The defendants are seeking condonation of delay of 59 days and further leave to file w.s. According to Ld. Advocate for defendant the defendant no. 1 was traveling and could not receive the writ of summons and thereafter due to Court vacations the w.s. could not be filed. The Ld. Advocate for plaintiff strongly opposed the NM by contending that in spite of the Ld. Advocate for defendant was appearing int eh matter the w.s was not filed and that the present NM has been taken out in order to delay the hearing and disposal of the suit. Considering the rival submissions, in view of the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Vimalkumar vs Vinodkumar reported in 1999 (1) Mh. L. J. 180 Rule 10 of Order VIII of C.P.C gives discretion to the Court and Court can permit to file w.s. at any stage prior to pronouncement of judgment. Therefore, the prejudice which may be caused to the plaintiff can be compensated in terms of costs. Thus the following order is passed- The NM no.3728/2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to payment of costs Rs. 3000/- to the plaintiff within a period of two weeks from today or to be deposited for that purpose in the Court within two weeks from today. Adjd for compliance to 03.05.2019. Judge 14 -- 14 of 14 --
