Order Details: Other Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 5 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :SUIT/0100931/2018 Mr. Pundlik Sadanad Nayak Vs MCGM Date : 16-10-2018 Business : Mentioned by praceipe. NOB. TOB. Adv. U. V. Singh with Adv. Anil R. Mishra with plaintiff and Adv. Rawade for MCGM are present. He tendered writ of service of summons. In order to maintain proper record the following Exh. Are marked. - Exh. 1 - Plaint Exh. 2 - Vakalatnama. O- Seen…
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Mr. Pundlik Sadanad NayakVsMCGM
CNR MHCC0100433120185-COURT 05 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--WITHDRAWL
Decision Date: 16th October 2018
TrustJury record updated 11 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100931/2018
- Registration Date
- 03 Apr 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
- 1MCGM
Acts & Sections
2Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 38
Terrorist and Disruptive and Activities (Prevention) Act · Sec 55 MRTP
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 04-04-2018 Business: Considering the rival submissions and nature of suit, it is the discretion of the concerned designated officer to allow personal hearing . The designated officer should exercise that discretion fairly. The plaintiff may produced any other documents before the designated officer showing the technicalities in the need of that exhaust Chimney on or before 06.04.2018. The designated officer to pass necessary order in the light of prevailing laws. If any adverse order is pass by the designated officer, no coercive action should be taken against the notice structure for a period of three days from the service of copy of order on the plaintiff. Ld. Adv. For plaintiff submits to dispose of the draft NM. Accordingly it is disposed off. The formality of registration of NM be completed. An ordinary copy duly authenticated by Sheristedar of this Court be provided to both the parties. Adjd. for written statement to 18-04-2018 Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2018 Date: 18-04-2018 Business: Resumed. The P.O. is busy in order in Stamp No. 5376/2018 and Judgment in Suit No. 976/2008 and hearing of Stamp No. 5502/2018. For want of time the board is discharged. Adjd. for written statement to 04.05.2018. Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT Next Hearing Date: 04-05-2018 Date: 04-05-2018 Business: Resumed. The P.O. is busy in recording evidence in Sessions Case No. 2/2018 and arguments/order on ad-interim reliefs in Suit No. 1117/2018, 1239/2018, 1139/2018 and 1234/2018. For want of time the board is discharged. Earlier order if any to continue till the next date. Adjd. for written statement to 13.07.2018. Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT Next Hearing Date: 13-07-2018 Date: 13-07-2018 Business: Resumed. Adv. Abhijeet Singh for plaintiff and Adv. Patil form MCGM are present. Adv. Singh tendered registered NM No. 1462 of 2018 which is already disposed off on 04.04.2018. Adv. Singh seeks time for instructions about the progress of the matter pending before the designated officer. Adv. Patil seeks time to file w.s. Time is granted. Adjd for written statement to 03.09.2018. Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2018 Date: 03-09-2018 Business: None for Plff. Adv. Pradeep Patil for MCGM is present. Adv. Patil seeks time to file Ws and also to submit whether final order is passed by the DO. Adj. For WS or Orders on 16/11/2018. Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2018 Date: 16-10-2018 Business: Mentioned by praceipe. NOB. TOB. Adv. U. V. Singh with Adv. Anil R. Mishra with plaintiff and Adv. Rawade for MCGM are present. He tendered writ of service of summons. In order to maintain proper record the following Exh. Are marked. - Exh. 1 - Plaint Exh. 2 - Vakalatnama. O- Seen and filed. Exh. 3 - Address Memo. O- R and R. Exh. 4 - List of documents. O - Seen and filed. Exh. 5 - Affidavit in support of plaint. Exh. 6 - Application for unconditional withdrawal of the suit filed by plaintiff along with copy of online status report. Matter pertains to A ward. The concern Advocate is not present. However, the plaintiff wants to withdraw the suit unconditionally. According to him the defendant corporation has dropped the action initiated against him and the notice structure. Permission is granted to withdraw the suit unconditionally. Order on Exh. 1 1. In view of the permission granted below Exh. 6 for withdrawal of the suit unconditionally, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn. 2. No order as to costs. 3. Court fee be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules. Order on NM No. 1462/2018 1. In view of withdrawal of the suit the NM No. 1462/2018 is dismissed as withdrawn. Nature Of Disposal: WITHDRAWL Disposal Date: 16-10-2018
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 104763/2018 Filing Date: 02-04-2018 First Hearing Date: 27th June 2018 Decision Date: 16th October 2018 Court Number And Judge: 5-COURT 05 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
2Final Order 1Full order available
16 Oct 2018
Order 1Full order available
16 Oct 2018
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 5 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :SUIT/0100931/2018 Mr. Pundlik Sadanad Nayak Vs MCGM Date : 16-10-2018 Business : Mentioned by praceipe. NOB. TOB. Adv. U. V. Singh with Adv. Anil R. Mishra with plaintiff and Adv. Rawade for MCGM are present. He tendered writ of service of summons. In order to maintain proper record the following Exh. Are marked. - Exh. 1 - Plaint Exh. 2 - Vakalatnama. O- Seen…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
