Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 28 Jan 2021 · CNR MHCC010042522019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: MHCC010042522019 Filed on :05.04.2019 Registered On:03.05.2019 Decided on :28.01.2021 Duration :Y-01/M-09/D-24 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO.529 OF 2019 Exhibit- 12 M/s. Gifting Ideas Company Private Ltd.,a company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at No. 206, Cama Industrial Estate, Sunmill Compound, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai-400 013 Through its authorised signatory Mrs. Rekha Shetty ...Plaintiff V/s. Ms. Stella Peter Vaz, an adult, Indian Inhabitant, at Present residing in Eddle House, Room No.11, 1st floor, Pedder Road, Mumbai-400 026. ... Defendant SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF RS.95,172/- Appearance:- Mrs. Leena Rajesh Temkar Advocate for the plaintiff. Exparte against Defendant. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE SMT. S.G. SHAIKH. CITY CIVIL COURT GR.MUMBAI (C.R. NO.59). DATE : 28/01/2021 -- 1 of 6 -- Summ. Suit No.529/2019 2 JUDGMENT (Dictated and pronounced in Open Court.) 1. This is a summary suit under order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure 1908. The facts of the case are as under : 2. The Plaintiff is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 doing business of Corporate Gifting. The defendant joined the services of the plaintiff as “ Manager- Business Development” on 14.03.2018. The plaintiff had issued appointment letter dated 14.03.2018 to the defendant duly signed by both the director of the plaintiff and defendant herself. From 08/06/2018 onwards, the defendant stopped reporting for the work without any information and permission of the plaintiff. As the defendant was holding a senior position with key responsibilities of business procurement and development, the business of the plaintiff company was totally disturbed due to the defendant abruptly remain absent for a long period of time from the plaintiff company without any intimation. Thereafter, the plaintiff sent letter dated 17.08.2018 and called upon the defendant to report immediately and complete the notice period and hand over proper charge to the superior and also to follow the proper rules. The defendant duly received the said letter of the plaintiff, but failed to report for her work. Again plaintiff by letter dated 29.08.2018 served upon defendant and informed the defendant that as the resignation of the defendant was without following due process of law and in violation of the terms of employment interalia, the defendant was liable to pay an amount of Rs. 84,000/- towards notice pay in lieu of notice as per the terms and conditions of employment -- 2 of 6 -- Summ. Suit No.529/2019 3 mentioned in the appointment letter and further called upon the defendant to pay the same within seven days from the date of the receipt of the notice. The defendant duly received the said letter of the plaintiff company but failed to respond inspite of legal notice dated 20.10.2018. According to the plaintiff defendant is liable to pay amount of Rs.84,000/- on the date of the filing of the suit. Hence, plaintiff is constrained to file the suit for recovery of the said amount. The total suit claim of the plaintiff for Rs.84,000/-. 3. The suit summons were duly served on the defendant but he failed to appear. Hence, suit is posted for judgment as per order XXXVII Rule 2(3) of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 judgment. 4. The following points arise for my determination and my findings thereon are as under for the reasons stated there under:- Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS. 1. What is due and payable from the defendant to the plaintiff ? A] If yes, what would be the rate of interest? Amount of Rs.84,000/- with interest @ 10% per annum 2. What order and decree? As per final order. REASONS 5. In order to prove the case of the plaintiff filed following documentary evidence. -- 3 of 6 -- Summ. Suit No.529/2019 4 Exhibit. No. Description of documents Date 7 Board Resolution 01/03/2020 8 Record Office Copy of the appointment letter of the defendant 14/03/2018 9 Photo copy of the plaintiff letter alongwith RPAD 17.08.2018 10 Photo copy of the plaintiff letter alongwith RPAD 29.08.2018 11 Photo copy of the plaintiff’s advocate notice alongwith photo copy of RPAD 20.10.2018 AS TO POINT NO.1: 6. All the documents produced by the plaintiff at list Exhibit 7 to 11 go to establish that plaintiff has appointed the defendant as Manger-Business Development on 14.03.2018. The documents further prove that the amount of Rs.84,000/- is due and payable to the plaintiff from defendant towards notice pay in lieu of notice as per the terms and conditions of employment mentioned in the appointment letter. But, defendant failed to pay an amount of Rs.84,000/- towards notice pay in lieu of notice as per the terms and conditions of employment mentioned in the appointment letter. The documents at list Exhibit-7 to 11 go to establish that defendant is liable to pay Rs.84,000/- to the plaintiff on the date of filing of the suit. In this background, it is held that plaintiff is entitled to recover sum of Rs.84,000/- from the defendant. 7. The plaintiff has claimed 18% per annum on the principal amount. As per section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure the rate of -- 4 of 6 -- Summ. Suit No.529/2019 5 interest may exceed 6% per annum, if the transaction is commercial and there is no contract pertaining to the same between the parties. In the present case the transaction is a commercial one and there is no contract existing between the parties as to the rate of interest which shall be levied. Therefore, rate of interest at the rate of 10% per annum would be just and proper to be awarded on the principal amount of Rs.84,000/-. Hence, point no.1 is answered in the affirmative. AS TO POINT NO.2: 8. In view of discussion and finding on point no.1, it is held that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.84,000/- from the defendant with interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover cost of the suit from the defendant. Hence, in answered to point no.2, I proceed to pass the following order. ORDER 1. The defendant shall pay Rs.84,000/- (Rs. Eighty Four Thousand Only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. 2. The defendant do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff. 3. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per the rules. 4. Decree be drawn accordingly. (S. G. Shaikh) Judge, City Civil Court, Date :28/01/2021 Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 28/01/2021 Typed on : 28/01/2021 Signed on : -- 5 of 6 -- Summ. Suit No.529/2019 6 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 28.01.2021 04.50 p.m. ( Mayuresh P. Tathe) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Smt. S. G. Shaikh (C.R.No.59) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 28/01/2021 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 28/01/2021 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 28/01/2021 -- 6 of 6 --
