Full Order Text
Order 1 · 11 Mar 2021 · CNR MHCC010042182018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Judgment Exh. 1 Sum.Suit 740/18 MHCC010042182018 Presented on : 28-03-2018 Registered on : 21-07-2018 Decided on : 11-03-2021 Duration : 2 years 11 months 11 days IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 740 OF 2018 Mahavir Lalchand Rathod Age 48 years of Mumbai, an adult, Indian Inhabitant, having his address at 140, Pine Bldg., D’lima Street, Dockyard (E), Mumbai 400 010 ...Plaintiff Versus Mohammed Ilyas Malim age : not known of Mumbai an adult Indian inhabitant, working for gain with Mazgaon Dock Ltd., WLD Dept, Mazdoor-III, Chipper Grounder, Emp I.D.No.00023120 Dockyaard (East), Mumbai 400010 and residing at Bombay House, 2nd Floor, Room No.15, Nava Nagar, Dockyard Road, Mumbai 400 010. ….Defendant. Appearances:- Advocate Mr. Ramesh Jain for the Plaintiff. Defendant Ex-parte. -- 1 of 5 -- Judgment Exh. 2 Sum.Suit 740/18 CORAM : HIS HONOUR AD-HOC JUDGE DEEPAK L. BHAGWAT (C.R. NO. 28) DATE : 11th MARCH, 2021 J U D G M E N T 1. This is Summary Suit for recovery of amount of Rs.68,358/- (Rupees Sixty Eight Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty Eight Rupees Only) with interest at the rate of 15% p.a.. 2. According to the plaintiff, he is carrying on business of Money lending. In consideration of Rs.55,000/- obtained by the defendant from the plaintiff, the defendant executed promissory note of same amount on 28/04/2016 in favour of the plaintiff. By same promissory note the defendant promised to pay interest at the rate of 15% p.a. on the said sum of Rs.55,000/-. However, the defendant neglected to pay the said amount. Despite service of legal notice of demand dated 14/10/2017, the defendant failed to pay the said amount. At the institution of the suit, the amount due and payable by the defendant was Rs.68,358/-. Therefore, the plaintiff claimed decree for recovery of said amount with the interest. 3. Despite service of summons the defendant failed to appear. Therefore, the suit proceeded ex-parte against the Defendant. 4. Considering the material on record and submissions made on behalf of the plaintiff points arise for determination along with my findings thereon for the reasons recorded are as under:- -- 2 of 5 -- Judgment Exh. 3 Sum.Suit 740/18 POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of the amount ? Affirmative. 2. At what rate of pendente lite and future interest ? 12% p.a. 3. What order & decree? As per final order REASONS AS TO POINTS NO.1 to 3:- 5. The plaintiff filed his Claim Affidavit at Exh.6 and also produced documents with list Exh.7. The Affidavit and the document as promissory note dtd.28/04/2016 reveal that the defendant executed said promissory note for Rs.55,000/- in favour of the plaintiff and also promised to pay interest at the rate of 15% p.a.. Copy of license in Form No.3 shows that the plaintiff is licensed Money Lender. Despite legal notice dtd.14/10/2017, the defendant failed to pay the amount to the plaintiff. Thus, the Claim Affidavit, documents on record and the circumstance that defendant failed to appear and contest/challenge the suit, proved the case of the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to recovery of the amount. Considering overall facts and circumstances it is just and proper to grant interest at the rate of 12% p.a.. Hence, point No.1 is answered in the Affirmative and whereas point No.2 is answered as 12% p.a.. In view of Para-499 of Civil Manual court fees has to be refunded to the plaintiff, this being summary suit where the defendant did not appear. In answer to point No.3 order as follows is passed:- -- 3 of 5 -- Judgment Exh. 4 Sum.Suit 740/18 ORDER 1. The suit is ex-parte decreed with costs as under. 2. The Defendant shall pay to the plaintiff amount of Rs.68,358/- (Rupees Sixty Eight Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty Eight Rupees Only) with simple interest at the rate of 12% p.a. on principal amount of Rs.55,000/- from the date of suit till realization of the amount. 3. Court fees be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (Deepak L. Bhagwat) Ad-Hoc Judge, Date: 11/03/2021 City Civil Court, Gr. Mumbai Dictated on : 11.03.2021 Transcribed on : 11.03.2021 Date of sign : 12.03.2021 -- 4 of 5 -- Judgment Exh. 5 Sum.Suit 740/18 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE & TIME : 12.03.2021 3.15 p.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : S.S.BATHE Name of Judge (with Court Room No.) Shri.D.L.Bhagwat (C.R.NO.28) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT /ORDER 11.03.2021 JUDGMENT /ORDER signed by P.O. on 12.03.2021 JUDGMENT /ORDER uploaded on 12.03.2021 -- 5 of 5 --
