Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Suryavanshi OrgaizationVsThe Board of Directors of State Bank of India

CNR MHCC01004161201831-COURT 31 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 10th October 2019

TrustJury record updated 11 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100764/2020
Registration Date
27 Feb 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Suryavanshi Orgaization

    Respondent

    1. 1The Board of Directors of State Bank of India

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 26 · Rule 1

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 104542/2018
Filing Date: 27-03-2018
Decision Date: 10th October 2019
Court Number And Judge: 31-COURT 31  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    10 Oct 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 10.10.2019
Sr. no. 32
NM No.
1654/18
St. No.
4542/18
(Suit No.
764/20)
CORAM : H.H. AD HOC ASST. SESSION JUDGE
SHRI. G.G. BHANSALI (C.R.NO.31)
None present.
It is specifically observed in roznama dt. 24.07.2019 that
no steps on behalf of plaintiff since 18 months and it was
posted for dismissal. Thereafter on 30.07.2019 none
present on behalf of plaintiff. It clearly indicate disinterest
of plaintiff. Defendant no. 4 is Chief M.M. , Deft no. 5 is
Govt. servant, Deft. no. 6 State of Maharastra. There is no
notice u/s 80 of C.P.C. The action under SARFAESI
challenged by plaintiff. Primafacie this court don't have
jurisdiction. N.M. No. 1654/2018 is dismissed along
with Stamp No. 4542/2018.
(Suit be registered for statistical purpose and entry in
record room.)
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    10 Oct 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 10.10.2019
Sr. no. 32
NM No.
1654/18
St. No.
4542/18
(Suit No.
764/20)
CORAM : H.H. AD HOC ASST. SESSION JUDGE
SHRI. G.G. BHANSALI (C.R.NO.31)
None present.
It is specifically observed in roznama dt. 24.07.2019 that
no steps on behalf of plaintiff since 18 months and it was
posted for dismissal. Thereafter on 30.07.2019 none
present on behalf of plaintiff. It clearly indicate disinterest
of plaintiff. Defendant no. 4 is Chief M.M. , Deft no. 5 is
Govt. servant, Deft. no. 6 State of Maharastra. There is no
notice u/s 80 of C.P.C. The action under SARFAESI
challenged by plaintiff. Primafacie this court don't have
jurisdiction. N.M. No. 1654/2018 is dismissed along
with Stamp No. 4542/2018.
(Suit be registered for statistical purpose and entry in
record room.)
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.