Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Gajanan Shankar SatamVsMCGM

CNR MHCC0100409320186-COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 28th March 2018

TrustJury record updated 11 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100873/2018
Registration Date
27 Mar 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Gajanan Shankar Satam

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34 · 37

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 28-03-2018
Business: Advocate Mr. Nikhil Rajeshirke for plaintiff present and filed draft NM, and submitted that the designated officer of the defendant has not considered the reply and documents produced by plaintiff, and mechanically passed the order. Thus, the due process of law is not follow.
Advocate Mr. Sutar for deft./MMC present and submitted that the concerned officer Shri Amol Thavil instructed him that the reply will be considered and thereafter, appropriate order will be passed. Hence, defendant-corporation is directed to consider the reply and documents are filed by plaintiff and then speaking order. Till then defendant-corporation is directed not to take any coercive action in the suit structure.
Suit and draft NM are disposed off.
NM be registered for statistical purpose.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 28-03-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 104478/2018
Filing Date: 26-03-2018
First Hearing Date: 19th June 2018
Decision Date: 28th March 2018
Court Number And Judge: 6-COURT 06  ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    28 Mar 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :SUIT/0100873/2018
Gajanan Shankar Satam Vs MCGM
Date : 28-03-2018
Business : Advocate Mr. Nikhil Rajeshirke for plaintiff present and
filed draft NM, and submitted that the designated officer of
the defendant has not considered the reply and documents
produced by plaintiff, and mechanically passed the order.
Thus, the due process of law is not follow. Advocate Mr.
Sutar for deft./MMC present and submitted that the
concerned officer Shri Amol Thavil instructed him that the
reply will be considered and thereafter, appropriate order will
be passed. Hence, defendant-corporation is directed to
consider the reply and documents are filed by plaintiff and
then speaking order. Till then defendant-corporation is
directed not to take any coercive action in the suit structure.
Suit and draft NM are disposed off. NM be registered for
statistical purpose.
Nature of Disposal : OTHER
Disposal Date : 28-03-2018
COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    28 Mar 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :SUIT/0100873/2018
Gajanan Shankar Satam Vs MCGM
Date : 28-03-2018
Business : Advocate Mr. Nikhil Rajeshirke for plaintiff present and
filed draft NM, and submitted that the designated officer of
the defendant has not considered the reply and documents
produced by plaintiff, and mechanically passed the order.
Thus, the due process of law is not follow. Advocate Mr.
Sutar for deft./MMC present and submitted that the
concerned officer Shri Amol Thavil instructed him that the
reply will be considered and thereafter, appropriate order will
be passed. Hence, defendant-corporation is directed to
consider the reply and documents are filed by plaintiff and
then speaking order. Till then defendant-corporation is
directed not to take any coercive action in the suit structure.
Suit and draft NM are disposed off. NM be registered for
statistical purpose.
Nature of Disposal : OTHER
Disposal Date : 28-03-2018
COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.