Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Smt. Nanakibai Hiranand SohandaVsGeeta Teju Sohanda

CNR MHCC0100406320199-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 26th February 2020

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101523/2019
Registration Date
11 Apr 2019

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 27-06-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 16-09-2019

Date: 16-09-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 27-11-2019

Date: 27-11-2019
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 22-01-2020

Date: 22-01-2020
Business: Advocate V. E. Pereira for Plaintiff present
Defendant present.
Court is busy in hearing Hon\''ble High Court time bound Notice of Motions in suit no.627/13 as well as court has to hear urgent matters, hence case is adjourned to 26/02/2020.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2020

Date: 26-02-2020
Business: Advocate Mr. Pereira for Plaintiff present
Advocate Ms. Usha Dupargude for Defendant present
                       ORDER ON NM NO.1523/19
This Notice of Motion is taken out by Defendant for condonation of delay of 70 days caused in filing Written Statement by Defendant.  In the affidavit filed by Defendant, it is contended that parties were thinking for amicable settlement and matter was referred to Lok-adalat dated 08/12/2018, however there was no settlement between the parties and meanwhile Defendant could not meet her lawyer for preparation of Written Statement, hence 70 days delay is caused in filing Written Statement.
Plaintiff\''s CA, Atmaram Sohanda has filed his affidavit in reply and resisted Notice of Motion contending that admittedly writ of summons was served on Defendant on 05/10/2018 and she should have filed Written Statement within stipulated time, however, Defendant has not given sufficient reason to condone the delay caused in filing Written Statement.
Heard advocate for Defendant Ms. Usha Dupargude and advocate for Plaintiff Mr. Pereira.  Considering the fact that parties were thinking for settlement but it could not take place, I find that delay caused in filing Written Statement by Defendant can be condoned directing Defendant to pay some costs to Plaintiff, hence I proceed to pass following order-
                       ORDER
Notice of Motion no.1523 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a), subject to cost of Rs.1500/- to be paid by Defendant to Plaintiff.
   It is made clear that on next date, if Defendant will pay cost amount to Plaintiff and will file her Written Statement, it will be accepted.
Case is adjourned to 27/03/2020 for compliance/Written Statement.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 26-02-2020

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 104268/2019
Filing Date: 11-04-2019
First Hearing Date: 27th June 2019
Decision Date: 26th February 2020
Court Number And Judge: 9-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1Full order available
26 Feb 2020

Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Daily Status IN THE COURT OF :COURT 9 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0101523/2019 Smt. Nanakibai Hiranand Sohanda Vs Geeta Teju Sohanda Date : 26-02-2020 Business : Advocate Mr. Pereira for Plaintiff present Advocate Ms. Usha Dupargude for Defendant present ORDER ON NM NO.1523/19 This Notice of Motion is taken out by Defendant for condonation of delay of 70 days caused in filing Written Statement by Defendant. In the affidavit filed…

Read Full Order

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.