Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 10 Apr 2019 · CNR MHCC010039802019
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: :1: Ch. S. No.797/2019 in Sum. Suit No.43/2019 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI CHAMBR SUMMONS NO. 797 OF 2019 CNR NO.: MHCC010039802019 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 43 OF 2019 M/s. Shankeshwara Food Product Pvt. Ltd. ...Plaintiff Versus Mr. Chandra Mohan ...Defendant. Appearances: Advocate Kukreja for the plaintiff. Advocate Ms. Vrushali Ghorpade for defendant. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE S.P. AGARWAL (C.R.NO.28) DATED : 10th APRIL, 2019. ORAL ORDER 1. Defendant has stated that he is 61 years old person and suffering from heavy diabetes and hyper tension since 20 years. Defendant has further stated that in the year 2017, he was diagnosed with a serious Heart Disease for which he underwent a heart surgery. Defendant has further stated that in the year 2018, he started suffering acute back pain due to the problem of spine. Defendant has further stated that he cannot even stand for more time. Defendant has further stated that on 9th February 2019 he underwent a cataract surgery on his left eye and another cataract on right eye was scheduled in March. He has further stated that due to these reasons he could not appear in the suit. 2. Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff filed reply to this Chamber -- 1 of 3 -- :2: Ch. S. No.797/2019 in Sum. Suit No.43/2019 Summons and stated that Writ of Summons were served upon defendant on 28.01.2019 and not on 31.01.2019. Plaintiff has further stated that the copy of RPAD card bears the signature of the defendant's representative. Plaintiff has further stated that the cataract surgery is not a major surgery by any means. Plaintiff has further stated that defendant has not produced any proof to show that the defendant's movements are restricted and prayed for rejection of application. 3. It appears defendant is 61 years old person and was suffering from heavy diabetes problem and suit summons was served upon defendant on 28.01.2019 as per postal acknowledgment through his representative. It appears present Chamber Summons is filed on 28.02.2019. Hence, considering the period of delay and Medical Papers on record and fact that defendant is a old person not keeping good health, in the circumstances of this case, it appears delay on part of defendant is not intentional. But at the same time considering the circumstances of this case, it appears delay can be condononed subject to compensatory cost to be given to plaintiff. Hence, following order : ORDER 1. Chamber Summons No. 797 of 2019 is allowed, subject to cost of Rs.500/ to be given by defendant to plaintiff. 2. Chamber Summons No. 797 of 2019 stands disposed of. (S.P. AGARWAL) Judge, Date: 10.04.2019. City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay. Dictated on : 10.04.2019 Transcribed on : 10.04.2019 Signed on : 10.04.2019 -- 2 of 3 -- :3: Ch. S. No.797/2019 in Sum. Suit No.43/2019 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 12.04.2019 At 1:29 p.m. Mr. Subhash Sukhdeo Poul UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Ms. S.P. Agarwal (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 10.04.2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 10.04.2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 12.04.2019 -- 3 of 3 --
