Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Pankaj Amritlal Patel +1 moreVsKirit Amritlal S. Patel +1 more

CNR MHCC0100382320183-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 17th July 2018

TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101895/2018
Registration Date
25 Jul 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Petitioner

    1. 1Pankaj Amritlal Patel
    2. 2Geeta Pankaj Patel

    Respondent

    1. 1Kirit Amritlal S. Patel
    2. 2Mrs. Krunal Kirit Patel

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 17-07-2018
Business: Adv. Rita Malhotra for plaintiff present.
Heard Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that office has raised objection regarding territorial jurisdiction of this court to try the present suit. It  appears that the Court at Dindoshi has jurisdiction to try the present suit. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff prays that the plaint be returned for presentation before the proper Court. Hence the plaint be returned to the plaintiff and his advocate for presentation to the proper Court.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 17-07-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 104242/2018
Filing Date: 20-03-2018
First Hearing Date: 17th July 2018
Decision Date: 17th July 2018
Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    17 Jul 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 17.07.2018
ST 4242/18
CORAM : G.R. AGRAWAL, JUDGE (C.R. No.03)
Adv. Rita Malhotra for plaintiff present.
Heard Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that office has raised objection
regarding territorial jurisdiction of this court to try the present suit.
It appears that the Court at Dindoshi has jurisdiction to try the
present suit. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff prays that the plaint be
returned for presentation before the proper Court. Hence the
plaint be returned to the plaintiff and his advocate for
presentation to the proper Court.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    17 Jul 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 17.07.2018
ST 4242/18
CORAM : G.R. AGRAWAL, JUDGE (C.R. No.03)
Adv. Rita Malhotra for plaintiff present.
Heard Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that office has raised objection
regarding territorial jurisdiction of this court to try the present suit.
It appears that the Court at Dindoshi has jurisdiction to try the
present suit. Ld. Counsel for plaintiff prays that the plaint be
returned for presentation before the proper Court. Hence the
plaint be returned to the plaintiff and his advocate for
presentation to the proper Court.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.