Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

State Bank of IndiaVsArafins Creation +2 more

CNR MHCC01003810201928-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 16th January 2020

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100754/2019
Registration Date
04 Apr 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Petitioner

    1. 1State Bank of India

    Respondent

    1. 1Arafins Creation
    2. 2Salim Ahmed Shaikh
    3. 3Nilofer Salim Shaikh

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 15-07-2019
Business: Adv.Narendra Devvansha for plaintiff present and filed registered chamber summons No.754/19 a/w. Affidavit.
Exh.1-Plaint
Exh.2-Vakalatnama
Exh.3-List of document
Exh.4-Memorandum of address.
Exh.5-Application for extension of time for substitute service t.o.r. O-Allowed.
Adjourned for Service of chamber summons and suit summons on 18.09.2019.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 18-09-2019

Date: 18-09-2019
Business: P.O. is on leave. Adjd to 20/11/19
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 20-11-2019

Date: 20-11-2019
Business: Adv. Devvansh for plff present.
Exh.1- Plaint
Exh.2- V/p
Exh.3- Memorandum of address.
Exh.4- List of documents.
Exh. 5- Affidavit of service.
Adjd. to 16.01.2020 for exparte order.
Next Purpose: EX-PARTE EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 16-01-2020

Date: 16-01-2020
Business: Adv. Devanshi for plaintiff.
Vide order dtd.20.03.2019 as noted in the Roznama the then presiding officer had granted permission for service of summons on the defendants by substituted mode. The summons has been accordingly published in the newspapers which are produced on record with affidavit Exh.5. Thus, there has been proper service of summons on the defendant. Despite service of summons the defendants failed to appear. Therefore, suit to proceed Ex-parte against the defendants.
Ch/s 754/19 is already disposed on 20.03.2019.
Adjd for Ex-parte evidence to 25.02.2020.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 16-01-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103925/2019
Filing Date: 04-04-2019
First Hearing Date: 15th July 2019
Decision Date: 16th January 2020
Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    16 Jan 2020
    Order Details: Chamber summons
Pdf Text: Dt: 16.01.2020
SUM 97/18 @
CHS 754/19
CORAM : H.H.J SHRI. DEEPAK L.
BHAGWAT(C.R.NO.28)
Adv. Devanshi for plaintiff.
Vide order dtd.20.03.2019 as noted in the Roznama the
then presiding officer had granted permission for service
of summons on the defendants by substituted mode. The
summons has been accordingly published in the
newspapers which are produced on record with affidavit
Exh.5. Thus, there has been proper service of summons on
the defendant. Despite service of summons the defendants
failed to appear. Therefore, suit to proceed Exparte
against the defendants.
Ch/s 754/19 is already disposed on 20.03.2019.
Adjd for Exparte evidence to 25.02.2020.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.