Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01003806201826 Apr 2018
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 26 Apr 2018 · CNR MHCC010038062018

Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: NM 1186/2018 SUIT 9986/1991 1
CNR.NO.MHCC010038062018
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1186 of 2018
IN
SUIT NO.9986 of 1991
M/s.West Coast Carriers . .. Plaintiff
Versus
Ardeshir B Cursetjee & Sons Limited .. .. Defendant
Smt.Kiran Chandurkar advocate for the Plaintiff.
Smt.Nikita Shah advocate for the Defendants.
Coram : Her Honour Judge
Smt. Pushpa N. Rao
Ad hoc Asstt.Judge
CR no. : 32
Dated : 26th April,2018
ORDER
1. Defendant had taken out this motion for setting aside no cross
order dated 01/02/2018 and allowed them to cross examine the
plaintiff witness.
2. Matter was listed for settlement on 19/12/2018 and the next date
was wrongly taken in the diary of plaintiff therefore, could not remain
present for cross examination. Hence, no cross order has been passed
against defendant. As defendant wants to take cross examination of
plaintiff witness hence order dated 01/02/2018 be set aside.
3. Plaintiff filed the reply. Plaintiff attending the court regularly but
defendant did not appear for cross examination hence, heavy cost my
be imposed and motion be dismissed .
4. Plaintiff had shown the willingness for settlement and defendant
-- 1 of 3 --
NM 1186/2018 SUIT 9986/1991 2
was directed to remain present for settlement but defendant not
appeared before the court. Plaintiff witness remained present regularly
before the court. On 01/02/2018 plaintiff witness was present, but
neither defendant nor their advocate appeared before the court hence,
no cross order has been passed against the defendant. But now,
defendant is ready to take cross examination of plaintiff witness. Hence,
the no cross order is required to be set aside.
5. Matter is of 1991, due to the absence of the defendant, no cross
order has been passed and ultimately matter is prolonged as defendant
taken out this motion. Considering this aspect, plaintiff is required to be
compensated by imposing cost of Rs.2000/ be paid to the plaintiffs
witness then only ‘no cross order’ will be set aside. Hence, proceed to
pass following order.
ORDER
1. Notice of Motion no.1186/2018 is made absolute subject to
cost of Rs.2000/(Rs.Two Thousand only) be paid to the
plaintiff witness.
2. After compliance defendant is allowed to cross examine
plaintiff witness.
Date : 26/04/2018 ( Pushpa N. Rao)
Ad hoc Asst.Judge
Bombay City Civil Court
Greater Mumbai
Dictation Direct typed on computer: 26/04/2018
Signed by HHJ on : 26/04/2018
-- 2 of 3 --
NM 1186/2018 SUIT 9986/1991 3
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER”.
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
03/05/2018at ( 3.12P.M.) Mrs. J.V.Pawar
Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Smt. Pushpa N. Rao
(Court Room no.32)
Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 26/04/2018
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 26/04/2018
JUDGMENT/ ORDER uploaded on 03/05/2018
.
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.