Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Yasmeen Sayed Sameer Ali - Suit St. No.3930 of 2019VsNaseem Akhtar Mohd. Islam Shaikh

CNR MHCC01003762201962-COURT 62 AD-HOC ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 01st October 2021

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101438/2019
Registration Date
03 Apr 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 08-04-2019
    
    Date: 10-04-2019
    
    Date: 30-04-2019
    
    Date: 14-06-2019
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 09-08-2019
    
    Date: 09-08-2019
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 17-10-2019
    
    Date: 17-10-2019
    Business: Court is busy in hearing and dictating order on NM in suit no.236/11 and hearing and dictating order on Chamber Summons in suit no.71/17 and court has to dictated Judgment in suit no.3856/99 and 3857/99, hence case is adjourned to 05/12/2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2019
    
    Date: 05-12-2019
    Business: None present for Plaintiff.
    Defendant present.
    Reply of Notice of Motion no.1438/19 is not filed by Plaintiff hence it is made clear that, if on next date, Plaintiff will not argue the NM court will be compelled to allow the Notice of Motion by considering arguments advanced on behalf of Defendant.
    Case is adjourned to 17/01/2020 for NM hearing.
    L.O.
    Advocate Mr. R. Gonsalves for Defendant present and submitted that he is not available on 17/01/2020 hence, matter may be fixed on 23/01/2020 as no one was/is present for Plaintiff the date is fixed to 23/01/2020.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 23-01-2020
    
    Date: 23-01-2020
    
    Date: 16-04-2020
    
    Date: 05-05-2020
    
    Date: 27-05-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2020
    
    Date: 12-06-2020
    Business: In view of extension of Lockdown period case is adjd. to 07.08.2020
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 07-08-2020
    
    Date: 07-08-2020
    Business: Adjourned due to Covid-19.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 10-09-2020
    
    Date: 10-09-2020
    
    Date: 07-12-2020
    
    Date: 23-02-2021
    
    Date: 20-04-2021
    
    Date: 23-07-2021
    Business: Court is on Leave.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2021
    
    Date: 01-10-2021
    Business: None present for the plff.
    Adv Mr. Rebello i/b Adv Mr. Gonsalves for deft present.
    Already several chances are given to the Plaintiff to argue NM No.1438/2019.
    As nobody is present for plff today also, N.M.No.1438/2019 is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
    Plaintiff is directed to remove all the office objections within two weeks from today and get the suit registered failing which, plaint shall be deemed to have been rejected.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
    Disposal Date: 01-10-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 104098/2019
    Filing Date: 03-04-2019
    First Hearing Date: 08th April 2019
    Decision Date: 01st October 2021
    Court Number And Judge: 62-COURT 62 AD-HOC  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    01 Oct 2021
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: 01/10/2021 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI P.P.RAJVAIDYA (C.R. NO.62)
    NM.No.
    1438/19
    None present for the plff.
    Adv Mr. Rebello i/b Adv Mr. Gonsalves for deft present.
    Already several chances are given to the Plaintiff to argue
    NM No.1438/2019.
    As nobody is present for plff today also,
    N.M.No.1438/2019 is dismissed in default for want of
    prosecution.
    Plaintiff is directed to remove all the office objections
    within two weeks from today and get the suit registered
    failing which, plaint shall be deemed to have been
    rejected.
    Judge
    *
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.