Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Mina Kiran Doshi - Applicant - Kiran Prataprai Doshi And Anr - Suit St. No. 2308 of 2019VsThe Commissioner MCGM

CNR MHCC0100375820198-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 10th June 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100738/2019
Registration Date
03 Apr 2019

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 05-04-2019
    Business: Adv. Mr. Jaideep Thakkar for Plff present.
    Adv. Mrs. Bhoir for MCGM/deft. present.
    Adv. Mr. Arun Mehta for applicant present and tendered original registered Ch/s No.738/19 alongwith affidavit.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    In view of office order No.66/19 dt.4/4/2019 of Hon\''ble Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai, this matter is transferred to C.R. No.9 for disposal in accordance with law.
    Adjd to 10/6/2019 for N/M and Ch/s reply.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 10-06-2019
    
    Date: 10-06-2019
    Business: Adv. Jaydeep Thakkar for Plaintiff present.
    Adv. Ms. Patil for Defendant/BMC present.
    Adv. Arun Mehta for applicant present.
    Adv. for plaintiff filed reply to Ch.s.  Copy served to Adv. for applicant.
    KB.
    L.o. at 3.40 p.m.
    Heard, both the sides on Ch/s.
    Order on Ch/s No. 738/2019
      Perused the Ch/s, reply filed thereto and heard both sides.  The plaintiffs are not disputing that the applicants are landlords of the suit building.  Ld. Adv. for plaintiff has objected the Ch/s on the ground that in challenge to the notice issued by Def/MCGM, presence of landlord is not necessary to decide controversy between the plaintiffs and def. MCGM.  Ld. Adv. for applicant has pointed out that in other suit filed by other tenants the present applicants, being landlords, are made parties.  As the applicants are landlords of the suit building any order of the Civil Court will affect their rights.  As such the applicants are necessary parties to the suit.  In view thereof Ch/s is allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).  The plaint be amended accordingly on or before next date and copy of amended plaint be served to the applicants.
    Adjd. to 25.06.2019 for compliance.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 10-06-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 104106/2019
    Filing Date: 03-04-2019
    First Hearing Date: 05th April 2019
    Decision Date: 10th June 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    10 Jun 2019

    Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: Dt.10/06/2019 SU 938/19 CORAM : H.H.J SHRI. C. V. MARATHE (C.R.NO.08) Adv. Jaydeep Thakkar for Plaintiff present. Adv. Ms. Patil for Defendant/BMC present. Adv. Arun Mehta for applicant present. Adv. for plaintiff filed reply to Ch.s. Copy served to Adv. for applicant. KB. L.o. at 3.40 p.m. Heard, both the sides on Ch/s. Order on Ch/s No. 738/2019 Perused the Ch/s, reply filed thereto and heard both sides. The plaintiffs are not disputing that…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.