Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 26 Feb 2020 · CNR MHCC010037442019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 NM 1437-19 in Suit No. 838-19 CNR NO.MHCC01-003744-19 IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1437 OF 2019 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 838 OF 2019 Mr. Kiran Phoolchand Jain …...Plaintiff Versus The Municipal Corporation for Gr. Mumbai & Ors. ..... Defendants Coram : Sanjay N. Yadav, Judge (Court Room no. 05) Date : 26th February, 2020. Appearance: Ld. Adv. Mr. Rajesh M. Patil for plaintiff. Ld. Adv. Mr. Suryavanshi for defendant/MCGM. ORDER 1. The plaintiff by this notice of motion seeks injunction restraining the defendant corporation from acting upon the Notice issued by the defendants under Section 354-A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (hereinafter referred to as 'the MMC Act') dated 11.03.2019. 2. Heard Learned Advocate for the plaintiff and learned Advocate for the defendant corporation. 3. The Schedule of the Notice dated 11.03.2019 reads as under: ‘’Unauthorized erection of light weight partition (work in -- 1 of 4 -- 2 NM 1437-19 in Suit No. 838-19 progress) with wooden plywood/Aluminum frame admeasuring 2.70m x 2.5m (ht), 4.40m x 2.5m (ht), 2.80m x 2.5m (ht), 4.10m x 2.5m (ht), 3.10m x 2.5m (ht), 3.50m x 2.5 m (ht), 4.15m x 2.5m (ht), 2.90m x 2.5 m (ht), 3.5m x 2.5m (ht), 3.35m x 2.5 m(ht), 4.70m x 2.5m (ht), 3.50m x 2.5m (ht) at east side basement, Queens Mansion, A.K. Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai-01 as shown in the sketch.’’ 3. The plaintiff had challenged the notice issued under Section 354- A of the MMC Act. 4. The reply is filed by the corporation. The plaint and written statement does not disclose that the speaking order is passed by corporation. It would be appropriate to direct the defendant corporation to consider the say and documents of the plaintiff and thereafter pass speaking orders at the earliest. The plaintiff is at liberty to submit the additional say or documents if he so desires. The plaintiff to approach the defendant corporation on 16.03.2020. The corporation to consider the reply and the documents of the plaintiff and thereafter pass reasoned order at the earliest. In case of any adverse order against plaintiff the corporation not to take any coercive action for a period of 15 days from the date of order. No purpose would be served in keeping the suit pending, the suit stands disposed off. The Notice of Motion No. 1437/2019 stands disposed off. Nothing survives in the suit. The suit also stands disposed off. In the result, following order is passed. ORDER 1) Suit is disposed of with following directions. 2) The defendant corporation is directed to consider the say and -- 2 of 4 -- 3 NM 1437-19 in Suit No. 838-19 documents of the plaintiff and thereafter pass speaking orders at the earliest. 3) The plaintiff is at liberty to submit the additional say or documents if he so desires. 4) The plaintiff to approach the defendant corporation on 16.03.2020. 5) The corporation to consider the reply and the documents of the plaintiff and thereafter pass reasoned order at the earliest. 6) In case of any adverse order against plaintiff the corporation not to take any coercive action for a period of 15 days from the date of order. 7) It would be at the discretion of the corporation to grant personal hearing of the plaintiff. 8) The Notice of Motion No. 1437 of 2019 as well as Suit No. 838 of 2019 stands disposed off. (Sanjay N. Yadav) Judge, Date : 26.02.2020 City Civil Court, Mumbai. Dictated on : 26.02.2020 Transcribed on : 28.02.2020 Signed by HHJ on : 12.03.2020 -- 3 of 4 -- 4 NM 1437-19 in Suit No. 838-19 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 12.03.2020 at 4.51 p.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mrs. K.S.Bhosale Name of the Judge (With Court Room no.) HHJ Shri. Sanjay N. Yadav C.R. no. 05 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 26.02.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 12.03.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 12.03.2020 -- 4 of 4 --
