Full Order Text
Order 2 · 20 Feb 2024 · CNR MHCC010035912018
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 755 OF 2024 (CNR No. MHCC01-001976-2024) IN L.C.SUIT NO.1342 OF 2018 Mr. Conrad D'Souza & Anr. … Plaintiffs. V/s. 1. Michael Debu Martin & Ors ...Defendants CORAM: HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. R. B. PARVEKAR CITY CIVIL COURT GR. MUMBAI DATE : 20/02/2024 Adv. Pratibha Dhamapurkar for the plaintiff. Adv. Shantanu Latpate for the defendant No.1 Adv. Ms. Meena Dhuri for the defendants/BMC. ORAL ORDER This Notice of motion is taken out by the defendant Nos. 2 to 4 for seeking permission to file Written statement on record by condonation of delay. Plaintiff objected present Notice of motion. 2. Read notice of motion and reply filed by the plaintiff. Heard both the sides. -- 1 of 4 -- 2 3. This is a suit for declaration in respect of tenancy document and injunction. As per record and proceeding, defendant Nos.2 to 4 served with writ of summons on 11.09.2018. From the record it is clear that there is delay of five years. No doubt, defendant Nos.2 to 4 is a statutory body and there are so many litigations are pending against BMC. Grounds mentioned by defendant nos. 2 to 3 in respect of nature of work carried out by defendant nos. 2 to 4 found to be just and reasonable one. Apart from this, it is settled principle of law that equal opportunity should be granted to both the parties by following principle of audi-alteram-partem. Learned Advocate for plaintiff, expressed his submission that cost be imposed. 4. In the present case, there is a considerable delay on the part of defendant nos.2 to 4 for filing written statement on record. The said delay can be considerable by imposing justifiable costs. If defendant Nos. 2 to 4 are permitted to file written statement subject to costs then it will not cause prejudice to the rights of plaintiff. On the contrary, suit will be decided on merit. It also curtail the multiplicity of litigation. Therefore,for final adjudication of the suit on merit, it is just and equitable in the eye of law to grant permission to defendant Nos. 2 to 4 for filing written statement. Accordingly, I proceed to pass following order. -- 2 of 4 -- 3 ORDER 1. Notice of motion No.755/2024 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to costs of Rs.1000/- payable to plaintiff. 2. Upon payment of cost of Rs.1000/- by defendant Nos.2 to 4 to plaintiff, written statement of defendant Nos.2 to4 be taken on record. 3. Both the parties to take note of this order. 4. Cost in cause. 5. Notice of motion No.755/2024 is disposed off. Date-20.02.2024 (R. B. Parvekar) Ad-hoc Judge,City Civil Court Gr. Mumbai D i c t a t e d o n : 2 0 . 0 2 . 2 0 2 4 Ty p e d o n : 2 0 . 0 2 . 2 0 2 4 s i g n e d o n : -- 3 of 4 -- 4 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 21/02/2024 06.00 p.m ( Mayuresh P. Tathe) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Shri. R. B. Parvekar (C.R.No.06) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 20/02/2024 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 21/02/2024 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 21/02/2024 -- 4 of 4 --
