Skip to main content
SUMMARY CIVIL SUIT - SUMMARY SUIT

M/s. RSWM Ltd.VsM/s. Datsun Fashion Ltd. +3 more

CNR MHCC0100358520183-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 10th October 2019

TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100204/2020
Registration Date
17 Feb 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    5

    Petitioner

    1. 1M/s. RSWM Ltd.

    Respondent

    1. 1M/s. Datsun Fashion Ltd.
    2. 2Kewalchand Jain
    3. 3Venu Narayan Nair
    4. 4Saroj Ramayan Sharma

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec Order 37

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103960/2018
Filing Date: 14-03-2018
Decision Date: 10th October 2019
Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    10 Oct 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 10.10.2019
20
CORAM : HIS HONOR JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT
SHRI. V.V. VIDWANS (Court Room No. 03)
St 3960/18 Plaintiff and Advocate are absent.
On perusal of record, it is noticed that matter is lodged on
14.03.2018. Adjournments have been granted from time to time to
remove the office objections. Inspite of giving sufficient time, plaintiff
has failed to remove the objection till today. It seems plaintiff is not
interested in the case. No purpose will be served by keeping the
matter pending without progress.
Hence st. no. 3960/18 is dismissed for default. Suit be registered
for statistical purpose.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    10 Oct 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 10.10.2019
20
CORAM : HIS HONOR JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT
SHRI. V.V. VIDWANS (Court Room No. 03)
St 3960/18 Plaintiff and Advocate are absent.
On perusal of record, it is noticed that matter is lodged on
14.03.2018. Adjournments have been granted from time to time to
remove the office objections. Inspite of giving sufficient time, plaintiff
has failed to remove the objection till today. It seems plaintiff is not
interested in the case. No purpose will be served by keeping the
matter pending without progress.
Hence st. no. 3960/18 is dismissed for default. Suit be registered
for statistical purpose.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.