Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Katik Bharat GohelVsMCGM And Ors

CNR MHCC0100357620198-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--OTHER
Decision Date: 30th April 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100701/2019
Registration Date
29 Mar 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Katik Bharat Gohel

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM And Ors

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 04-04-2019
Business: None for Plff.
Counsel Mrs. Manish Salekar with Adv. Mrs. Mhatre for MCGM/deft. present.
KB - LO at 4.30 p.m.
Representative of Plff present and tendered original registered Ch/s No.701/19 alongwith affidavit.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Adjd to 23/4/2019 for Ch/s reply.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2019

Date: 23-04-2019
Business: (In-charge Court of C.R.No.8)
Adv. J.S. Kalanke for Plaintiff present.
Counsel Adv. Manisha Salekar with Adv. Mhatre for Defendant/MCGM present.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Adjd. to 30/04/2019 for Ch/s. hearing.
Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 30-04-2019

Date: 30-04-2019
Business: None from plaintiff.
MCGM Counsel Ms. Manisha Salekar with Adv. Ms. Mhatre  for deft.deft. 1 to 3 is present.
None for defendant nos.4 to 7. is present.
KB.
L.O.
Adv. Mr. J.S. Kalanke for plaintiff is present.
MCGM Counsel Ms. Manisha Salekar with Adv. Ms. Mhatre  for deft. 1 to 3 is present.
None for defendant nos.4 to 7.
ORDER ON C/S NO. 701/2019
By instant C/S plaintiffs have prayed to add technical advisory committee(TAC) of defendant no.1/MCGM as party to this suit on the ground that  in the affidavit in  reply of defendant no.1 to N/M no. 2594/18 the defendant no.1 has raised this point that the suit is bad for none joinder of TAC as necessary party to the suit. However, after going through the plaint, the reliefs are sought against the defendant no.1 /MCGM. TAC is appointed by defendant no.1 and it works under the latter.  Any order against defendant no.1 would be binding on TAC. Therefore, TAC did not be added as party to the suit of hence, C/S is rejected.
Defendant no.4 and 5 have failed to file reply on N/M. Hence, N/M will be heard without reply of defendant no.4 and 5.
Court busy in hearing in arguments on N/M No. 2925/2017 in Suit No.1882/2017.
Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 30-04-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103832/2019
Filing Date: 29-03-2019
First Hearing Date: 04th April 2019
Decision Date: 30th April 2019
Court Number And Judge: 8-COURT 08 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    30 Apr 2019

    Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: Dt.30/04/2019 SU 2989/18 CORAM : H.H.J SHRI. C. V. MARATHE (C.R.NO.08) None from plaintiff. MCGM Counsel Ms. Manisha Salekar with Adv. Ms. Mhatre for deft.deft. 1 to 3 is present. None for defendant nos.4 to 7. is present. KB. L.O. Adv. Mr. J.S. Kalanke for plaintiff is present. MCGM Counsel Ms. Manisha Salekar with Adv. Ms. Mhatre for deft. 1 to 3 is present. None for defendant nos.4 to 7. ORDER ON C/S NO.…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.