Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Shri Govindram Girdharidas Bajaj - Applicant - Shakuntala Govindram BajajVsShri Ritesh Govindram Bajaj +1 more

CNR MHCC0100357520199-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 02nd November 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100700/2019
Registration Date
29 Mar 2019

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 01-04-2019
    Business: Matter is adjd. to. 15.06.2019 for report of service of Ch/sum and hearing on Ch/sum No.700/19.
    Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
    Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2019
    
    Date: 15-06-2019
    Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
    Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
    Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2019
    
    Date: 06-08-2019
    Business: Advocate Mr. Jani for Plaintiff present and filed an application to serve Chamber Summons upon proposed Defendants through Sheriff\''s office of Mumbai, t.o.r. O-Allowed as prayed.
    Court is busy in dictating Judgment in suit no.2140/17 and order on NM in suit no.234/19, hence case is adjourned to 20/09/2019.
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2019
    
    Date: 20-09-2019
    Business: Advocate Jani for Plaintiffs present
    Defendant no.2 filed reply to Chamber Summons no.700/19, t.o.r.
    Plaintiffs advocate submitted that he will serve the copy of Chamber Summons on LRs of deceased Plaintiff no.1.  Time extended for service of Chamber Summons.  Plaintiff no.2 is directed to file on next date, the affidavit of service of Chamber Summons.
    Case is adjourned to 02/11/2019 for service/hearing of Chamber Summons.
    Next Purpose: C/S  HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 02-11-2019
    
    Date: 02-11-2019
    Business: Advocate Jani for Plaintiff present
    Defendant no.2 present.
    Heard.
                     ORDER IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.700/19
    This Chamber Summons is taken out by Shakuntala Govindram Bajaj, the wife of original Plaintiff Govindram Giridhardas Bajaj for brining on record LRs of original Plaintiff who died on 30/12/2018.  Death certificate of original Plaintiff  Govindram Giridhardas Bajaj is also filed on record.
    Defendant no.2 has filed her affidavit in reply and resisted Chamber Summons contending that applicant Shakuntala Bajaj is not intending to show name of her son Ritesh Govindram Bajaj as legal heir of original Plaintiff, hence according to Defendant no.2 Chamber Summons is necessary to be dismissed, because husband of Defendant no.2 is not shown as legal heir of original Plaintiff. It is alleged that this suit is filed by original Plaintiff in collusion with Defendant no.1.
    Heard advocate Mr. Jani, who has submitted that postal envelope of copy of this Chamber Summons is refused by Dinesh Govindram Bajaj and Namrata @ Anita Naresh Melvani, the proposed LRs of original Plaintiff.  Advocate Mr. Jani submitted that if the Chamber Summons will be allowed and if legal heirs of original Plaintiff will be brought on record, copy of amended plaint will be served upon Dinesh Bajaj and Namrata @ Anita Naresh Melvani as well as it will be served upon Defendants.
    Defendant no.2 submitted that this Chamber Summons is necessary to be dismissed because Defendant no.1 Ritesh Govindram Bajaj, who is son of original Plaintiff Govindram Giridhardas Bajaj is not shown in Chamber Summons as LR of original Plaintiff.
    I have given serious consideration to the submissions made on behalf of the parties.  As Ritesh Govindram Bajaj the legal heir of Plaintiff is already on record as Defendant no.1, I find that he can not be added as Plaintiff and LR of original Plaintiff. Further, death certificate filed on record shows that original Plaintiff  Govindram Giridhardas Bajaj died on 30/12/2018 and this Chamber Summons is filed on 25/03/2019 i.e. within 90 days from the date of death of original Plaintiff, hence the Chamber Summons is necessary to be made absolute, hence I proceed to pass following order-
                                        ORDER
    1. Chamber Summons no.700 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
    2. Applicant is directed to carry out proposed amendment in the plaint within stipulated time provided by law.
    3. Applicant is further directed to serve the copies of amended plaint upon proposed Plaintiffs and upon the Defendants of this suit.
    4.Applicant is directed to file typed copy of amended plaint for the record of the court.
    Case is adjourned to 16/11/2019 for Compliance.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 02-11-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103848/2019
    Filing Date: 29-03-2019
    First Hearing Date: 01st April 2019
    Decision Date: 02nd November 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 9-COURT 09 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    02 Nov 2019

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Advocate Jani for Plaintiff present Defendant no.2 present. Heard. ORDER IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.700/19 This Chamber Summons is taken out by Shakuntala Govindram Bajaj, the wife of original Plaintiff Govindram Giridhardas Bajaj for brining on record LRs of original Plaintiff who died on 30/12/2018. Death certificate of original Plaintiff Govindram Giridhardas Bajaj is also filed on record. Defendant no.2 has filed her affidavit in reply and resisted Chamber Summons contending that applicant Shakuntala Bajaj is…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.