SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Smt. Surekha Machindra ShikhreVsRanjana Pandurang Shikhre +7 more
CNR MHCC01003564201812-COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 05th February 2021
TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 101019/2018
- Registration Date
- 07 Apr 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
9Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 02-05-2018 Business: None present. Plaintiff to serve writ of summons upon Defendants. Adjourned to 17.09.2018 for Service. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2018 Date: 17-09-2018 Reason For Adjournment: court time is over Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 28-09-2018 Date: 28-09-2018 Business: Adv. For Plaintiff prayed for time to file documents. Matter adj. to 04/10/2018 for filing Documents/Order on Exhibit-5. Next Purpose: ORDER Next Hearing Date: 04-10-2018 Date: 04-10-2018 Business: Matter adj. to 20/12/2018 for service of Writ of Summons. Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS Next Hearing Date: 20-12-2018 Date: 20-12-2018 Reason For Adjournment: court time is over Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS Next Hearing Date: 10-04-2019 Date: 10-04-2019 Business: Adjd Next Purpose: DISMISSAL Next Hearing Date: 29-07-2019 Date: 29-07-2019 Business: Adv. Bhavna Kunale for the Plaintiff present. Application for leave u/s 80 (2) tendered by the Plaintiff for seeking leave. t.o.r. It appears that the Plaintiff has filed the suit in the month of March 2018 against a public officer without issuing notice u/s 80 of CPC. At the time of filing of the suit, even the Plaintiff has not sought leave u/s 80 (2) of CPC. In such peculiar circumstances, after near about 1 year and 4 months today, the Plaintiff has filed this application for seeking leave u/s 80 (2) of CPC. Basically suit against a public officer in respect of act purporting to be done by the public officer, without notice suit is not maintainable. Therefore, at this stage of the suit, this application is not maintainable. Hence, application is rejected. It appears that the suit is instituted by the Plaintiff against a public officer i.e Defendant nos. 5, 6 and 7 without issuing notice u/s 80 of CPC. Therefore suit is not maintainable against Defendant no. 5 to 7 for want of notice. Hence, suit is hereby dismissed against Defendant nos. 5 to 7 for want of notice u/s 80 of CPC. Matter is adjd. to 6.11.2019 for steps by the Plaintiff. Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 06-11-2019 Date: 06-11-2019 Business: None present for the Plaintiff . None present for Defendant . Matter is adjd. to 18.12.2019 for steps by plaintiff. Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 18-12-2019 Date: 18-12-2019 Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 23-03-2020 Date: 23-03-2020 Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2020 Date: 01-04-2020 Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 16-04-2020 Date: 16-04-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 05-05-2020 Date: 05-05-2020 Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 27-05-2020 Date: 27-05-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2020 Date: 12-06-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 19-10-2020 Date: 19-10-2020 Business: Due to lockdown because of Covid-19, board is discharged and as per SOP only urgent matters are taken up. Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS Next Hearing Date: 05-02-2021 Date: 05-02-2021 Business: None for plaintiff. The plff has not taken steps for service of summons since long. Today also, the plff has failed to take steps for service of summons. Hence, the suit is dismissed for default. Proceeding is closed. Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT Disposal Date: 05-02-2021
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 103905/2018 Filing Date: 13-03-2018 First Hearing Date: 02nd May 2018 Decision Date: 05th February 2021 Court Number And Judge: 12-COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
2Final Order 105 Feb 2021
05 Feb 2021
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :SUIT/0101019/2018 Smt. Surekha Machindra Shikhre Vs 1.Ranjana Pandurang Shikhre 2.Navnath Pandurang Shikhre 3.Pramila Jagdish Sadabhate Date : 05-02-2021 None for plaintiff. The plff has not taken steps for service of summons since long. Today also, the plff has failed to take steps for service of summons. Hence, the suit is dismissed for default. Proceeding is closed. -- 1 of 1 --
Order 105 Feb 2021
05 Feb 2021
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :SUIT/0101019/2018 Smt. Surekha Machindra Shikhre Vs 1.Ranjana Pandurang Shikhre 2.Navnath Pandurang Shikhre 3.Pramila Jagdish Sadabhate Date : 05-02-2021 None for plaintiff. The plff has not taken steps for service of summons since long. Today also, the plff has failed to take steps for service of summons. Hence, the suit is dismissed for default. Proceeding is closed. -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
