Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 02 Dec 2021 · CNR MHCC010035592020
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: Filed on :16.07.2020 Registered On :04.02.2021 Decided on :02.12.2021 Duration : Y-01/M-04/D-18 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 103 OF 2021 IN Exhibit-08 Ambalal Rikhabchandji Jain Age: 47 years. of Mumbai, an adult Indian inhabitant, carrying on business of Money Lending as a Sole Proprietor in the name and style of Ritik Creation at and from Room No. 20, Ground Floor, Gulam Mohmad Building, Navroji Hill Road no. 07, Dongari Mumbai- 400 009. ... Plaintiff V/s. 1.Narendra Bankimchandra Rathod Age not known of Mumbai an adult Indian, inhabitant working for gain Mumbai ‘C’ Ward, BMC, Shreekant palekar Marg, Chandanwadi, Mumbai- 400 002, EMP Code: 411894. Residing at BMC Chawl, ‘B’ Block, Room No. 41, Mavji Rathod Road, Walpakhadi, Mumbai- 400 009. 2. Rekha Narendar Rathod age not known of Mumbai an adult Indian, inhabitant Residing at BMC Chawl, ‘B’ Block, Room No. 41, Rathod Road, -- 1 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.103/2021 2 Walpakhadi, Mumbai- 400 009. ... Defendants SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY Appearance:- Mr. Ramesh Jain Advocate for the plaintiff. Exparte against Defendant. CORAM : HER HONOUR AD-HOC JUDGE SMT. A.H. KASHIKAR CITY CIVIL COURT, GR. BOMBAY (C.R. NO.61). DATE : 02/12/2021 JUDGMENT (Dictated and pronounced in Open Court.) 1. This is a summary suit instituted by the plaintiff under order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 against the defendant. 2. The suit claim of the plaintiff is narrated in nutshell as under: The Plaintiff is carrying on business of money lending as a sole properiter in the name and style of Ritik Creation. The defendant no.1 approached to the plaintiff and on dtd.29.7.2017 for valuable consideration of Rs.80,000/- received from plaintiff, drew a bill of exchange directing thereby, defendant no.2 to pay to the plaintiff or Order at Mumbai a sum of Rs.80,000/- on demand. Said bill of exchange was accepted and delivered by defendant no.2 to the plaintiff on the same day. On dtd. 29.8.2017 the plaintiff presented said bill of exchange to the defendant no.2 and demanded Rs.80,000/-. The -- 2 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.103/2021 3 defendant no.2 failed to honour said demand. Similarly, the defendant no.1 also failed and neglected to pay the amount of Rs.80,000/- . The plaintiff issued letter/notice to advocate on 30.7.2019 to the defendants calling upon them to pay the outstanding amount alongwith accrued interest but the defendants failed to comply with said requisition. The plaintiff averred that the defendants are liable jointly and severally to pay the outstanding amount with interest. 3. Thus, the plaintiff has filed the present suit against the defendant for recovery. It is averred that the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay a sum of Rs.1,21,148.49ps/- to the plaintiff and further interest at the rate of 18% p.a from the date of suit still its realization. Hence, this suit. 4. The suit summons were duly served on the defendant nos.1 and 2 but they failed to appear. Hence, suit is posted for judgment as per order XXXVII Rule 2(3) of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 judgment. 5. The following points arise for my determination and my findings thereon are as under for the reasons stated there under:- Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS. 1. Whether the plaintiff entitled for recovery of amount against the defendants ? A] If yes, what would be the rate of interest? Amount of Rs.1,21,148.49ps/ with interest @ 18% per annum 2. What order and decree? As per final order. -- 3 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.103/2021 4 REASONS 6. In order to establish the suit claim, the plaintiff has filed following documentary evidence below Exh.07 i.e the list of documents: Sr. No. Description of documents Exhibits 1 A Bill of Exchange dated 29th July, 2017 being Exhibit “A” to the plaint. Exh.7/1 2 Plaintiff’s Advocates’ letter dated 30th July 2019 being Exhibit “B” to the Plaint alongwith the postal records in connection with the transmission and delivery thereof. Exh.7/2 3 Money Lender Licence. Exh.7/3 4 Forms under Bombay Money Lending Act. Exh.7/4 5 Books of Accounts Exh.7/5 AS TO POINT NO.1: 7. This is a summary suit which is not contested by the defendants. The plaintiff has produced various documents on record. Further, he has filed affidavit below Exh.06 regarding service of writ of summons to the defendants. The documents produced on record by the plaintiff shows that the defendant no.1 received the amount of Rs.80,000/- from the plaintiff drawing bill of exchange directing thereby defendant no.2 to pay to the plaintiff or order a sum of Rs.80,000/- on demand and said bill of exchange has been accepted and delivered by the defendant no.2 to the plaintiff. Further, it reveals from the record the said transaction took place on dtd. 29.7.2017, the -- 4 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.103/2021 5 notice/letter of demand was issued to the defendants on dtd. 30.7.2019 and the suit is filed on 10.7.2020. As such, the plaintiff’s claim in the suit is well within limitation. 8. All the documents produced by the plaintiff at list Exhibit- 07 goes to establish that plaintiff has given amount of Rs.80,000/- to the defendant no.1 on bill of exchange. Said amount is not repaid either by the defendant no.1 or by defendant no.2. Both the defendants are liable jointly and severally to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.80,000/- to the plaintiff. In this background, I have arrived at the conclusion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover sum of Rs.80,000/- from the defendants jointly and severally. 9. According to the plaintiff the outstanding dues against the defendants is Rs.1,21,148.49ps/- and said amount is calculated alongwith interest at the rate of 18% p.a till the date of filing of the suit. So the total outstanding amount Rs.1,21,148.49ps/-. Apart from said amount which is due against the defendant on the date of filing of the suit, the plaintiff has claimed interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal amount. As per section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure the rate of interest may exceed 6% per annum, if the transaction is commercial and there is no contract pertaining to the same between the parties. In the present case the transaction is a commercial one and there is contract existing between the parties as to the rate of interest which shall be levied. As per the agreed terms defendant is liable to pay the interest at the rate of 18% p.a. Therefore, I hold, the rate of interest at the rate of 18% per annum would be just and proper to be awarded on the principal sum adjudged i.e. amount of Rs.80,000/-. Hence, point -- 5 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.103/2021 6 no.1 is answered in the affirmative. AS TO POINT NO.2: 10. In view of discussion and finding on point no.1, it is held that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.1,21,148.49ps/-from the defendant nos. 1 and 2 jointly and severally with interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal sum of Rs.80,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover cost of the suit from the defendants. Hence, in answered to point no.2, I proceed to pass the following order. ORDER 1. The defendant nos.1 and 2 shall pay Rs.1,21,148.49ps/-(Rs. One Lakh Twenty One Thousand One Hundred Forty Eight Rupees and Forty Nine paise Only) to the plaintiff jointly and severally, with interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the principal sum of Rs.80,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. 2. The defendant nos. 1 and 2 do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff. 3. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per the rules. 4. Decree be drawn accordingly. (A.H. Kashikar) AD-HOC Judge, City Civil Court, Date : 02/12/2021 Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 02/12/2021 Typed on : 02/12/2021 Signed on : 02/12/2021 -- 6 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.103/2021 7 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 02/12/2021 05.40 p.m. ( K.M. Rana ) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Smt. A.H. Kashikar (C.R.No.61) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 02/12/2021 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 02/12/2021 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 02/12/2021 -- 7 of 7 --
