Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Smt. Shakeena Rehmatulah KhanVsMaharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority +1 more

CNR MHCC01003558201812-COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 16th April 2019

TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100961/2018
Registration Date
03 Apr 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Petitioner

    1. 1Smt. Shakeena Rehmatulah Khan

    Respondent

    1. 1Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
    2. 2MBRRB

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 39

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 24-04-2018
Business: None present.
Plaintiff to serve writ of summons upon all Defendants.
Adjourned to 03.08.2018 for Service.
Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 03-08-2018

Date: 03-08-2018
Business: None present for Plaintiff.
Defendants are not yet served.  In view of this matter adj. to 23/10/2018 for passing appropriate Order
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 23-10-2018

Date: 23-10-2018
Business: Matter adj. to 16/11/2018 for Order.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 16-11-2018

Date: 16-11-2018
Business: As court is busy in dictating Ad-interim Order in St. No. 14582/18.
Hence, board is discharged.
Matter adj. to 01/12/2018 for Order
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 01-12-2018

Date: 01-12-2018
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 14-12-2018

Date: 14-12-2018
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 16-04-2019

Date: 16-04-2019
Business: None present for plaintiff.
KB for dismissal order.
LO at 5.15 pm
None appeared for the plaintiff when called again at 5.15 pm.  Despite granting several opportunities, plaintiff has failed to serve the defendants with writ of summons.  It appears that plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the suit.  There is no propriety to keep the matter pending any further in absence of plaintiff for want of evidence hence, suit is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Proceeding is thus closed.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 16-04-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103926/2018
Filing Date: 14-03-2018
First Hearing Date: 24th April 2018
Decision Date: 16th April 2019
Court Number And Judge: 12-COURT 12  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    16 Apr 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: None present for plaintiff. KB for dismissal order. LO at 5.15 pm None appeared for the plaintiff
when called again at 5.15 pm. Despite granting several opportunities, plaintiff has failed to serve the
defendants with writ of summons. It appears that plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the suit.
There is no propriety to keep the matter pending any further in absence of plaintiff for want of
evidence hence, suit is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Proceeding is thus closed.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    16 Apr 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: None present for plaintiff. KB for dismissal order. LO at 5.15 pm None appeared for the plaintiff
when called again at 5.15 pm. Despite granting several opportunities, plaintiff has failed to serve the
defendants with writ of summons. It appears that plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the suit.
There is no propriety to keep the matter pending any further in absence of plaintiff for want of
evidence hence, suit is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Proceeding is thus closed.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.