Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 21 May 2026 · CNR MHCC010035552020
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: Summary Suit No.572 of 2022 ...J/1 Judgment MHCC010035552020 Presented on : 16.07.2020 Registered on : 06.07.2022 Decided on : 21.05.2026 Duration : 05 Y : 10 M : 04 D Exhibit : 10 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MAZGAON SUMMARY SUIT NO.572 OF 2022 Swati Sahebrao Gadge, Age : 30 years, of Mumbai, an adult Indian inhabitant, having her address at Room No.1, plot No.198, Tulja Bhawani Society, Shivneri Nagar, Shingre Wadi, Bail Bazar, Kurla (W), Mumbai – 400 070. Through C.A. Priya Dhuri. ...Plaintiff. VERSUS Dadabhau Devram Kharat, Age not known of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant working for gain at B.M.C., BMC “M/E” Ward, Conservancy Dept., 4th Floor, Room No.402, Devnar Colony, Mumbai -400043. EMP. Code – 45551126. R/a. : Anand Nagar, N.G. Acharya Marg, Opp. Acharya Marathe College, Chembur, Mumbai – 400 071. …Defendant. Appearances : Adv. Madhuri Shirke h/f. Adv. Ramesh Jain. : for Plaintiff. Ex-parte. : For Defendant. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE N. B. LAVTE, (C.R.No.83) DATE : 21st May, 2026 -- 1 of 5 -- Summary Suit No.572 of 2022 ...J/2 Judgment J U D G M E N T (Ex-parte) This is a suit under Order XXXVII, Rule.2 of C.P.C for recovery of an amount of Rs.2,72,197.26 with 18% p.a on principal amount of Rs.2,00,000/- based on Demand Promissory Note. The suit is filed through C.A Priya Dhuri. 2. The brief facts of the plaintiff is that: She is a registered money lender. On 27.06.2018 defendant for valuable consideration of Rs.2,00,000/- received executed demand promissory note of Rs.2,00,000/- thereby promising to pay the said amount with 18% p.a. The said amount was demanded from time to time from defendant with accrued interest, however, he neglected and failed to pay the amount. On 27.02.2020, legal notice through advocate was issued to defendant calling upon him to pay the amount with accrued interest. Inspite of receipt of notice, defendant failed. Hence, suit for recovery of an amount of Rs.2,72,197.26 with 18% p.a. 3. The defendant was duly served with writ of summons vide Exh.02, however, he failed to appear. Hence, by an order dated 20.09.2023, suit was directed to proceed ex-parte. 4. From the pleadings, following points arise for my consideration and determination to which I have given my findings alongwith reasons as under: Sr. Points Findings 1. Is plaintiff entitled for recovery of an amount of Rs. 2,72,197.26 with 18% p.m on principal amount of Rs.2,00,000/- from defendant ? Partly Affirmative. 2. What order and decree ? As per final order. -- 2 of 5 -- Summary Suit No.572 of 2022 ...J/3 Judgment REASONS 5. In order to substantiate the suit claim, the C.A of plaintiff filed his claim affidavit vide Exh.03 and also placed reliance vide list (Exh.04) on the following documents namely, demand promissory note (Exh.05), Legal Notice (Exh.06), Money Lender License (Exh.07), Forms (Exh.08) and Books of Accounts (Exh.09). AS TO POINT NO.1 : 6. Heard Adv. Madhuri Shirke for plaintiff. Gone through the plaint and documents filed on record. From the Money Lender License (Exh.07) it reveals, plaintiff is a registered money lender. The demand promissory note (Exh.05) reveals it is signed and executed by defendant as it bears his signature and thumb impression wherein he agreed to pay to plaintiff Rs.2,00,000/-. According to plaintiff when the amount was demanded, defendant failed to pay which resulted in issuance notice Exh.06. The C.A of plaintiff filed his evidence affidavit vide Exh.03 which is verbatim of plaint. As the suit proceeded ex-parte, there is no any challenge to the pleadings, evidence and the documents. Thus, the suit is deemed to have been admitted. 7. As discussed above, the suit is ex-parte, therefore, pleadings, evidence and the documents have gone unchallenged. Therefore, the allegations in the plaint is deemed to be admitted. Thus, plaintiff proved liability of defendant of Rs.2,72,197.26 which defendant is liable to pay to plaintiff. As regards the rate of interest, plaintiff claimed 18% p.a, however, I am of the view that 6% p.a would be reasonable rate of interest on the principal amount from the date of filing of the suit till realization. Hence, I answer point No.1 partly in the affirmative. -- 3 of 5 -- Summary Suit No.572 of 2022 ...J/4 Judgment AS TO POINT NO.2 : 8. In view of my finding to point No.1, the suit is liable to be partly decreed with costs and the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. Rs.2,72,197.26 from defendant with 6% p.a on the principal amount Rs.2,00,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till realization with cost of the suit. In the result, I proceed to pass following order. ORDER 1. The Summary Suit No.572 of 2022 is partly decreed with costs. 2. The defendant is directed to pay to plaintiff an amount of Rs. 2,72,197.26 (rounded as Rs.2,72,197/-) (Rs. Two Lacs Seventy Two Thousand One Hundred and Ninety Seven) with 6% p.a on the principal amount of Rs.2,00,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till realization. 3. The decree be drawn up accordingly. 4. The R and P be sent to Record Department. ( N. B. Lavte ) Judge, (C.R.No.83) Dt.:21.05.2026. City Civil Court, Mazgaon, MUMBAI Dictated on : 21.05.2026 Transcribed on : 21.05.2026 checked on : 21.05.2026 Signed on : 21.05.2026. ( N. B. Lavte ) Judge, (C.R.No.83) City Civil Court, Mazgaon, MUMBAI -- 4 of 5 -- Summary Suit No.572 of 2022 ...J/5 Judgment “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 21.05.2026 at 4.15 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (Mrs. Manisha Srinath) NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge H.H.J.Shri. N. B. Lavte (COURT ROOM NO.83) Date of pronouncement of judgment/order 21.05.2026 Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 21.05.2026 Judgment/order uploaded on 21.05.2026 -- 5 of 5 --
