Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 16 Oct 2024 · CNR MHCC010035402019
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 692 OF 2019 IN L.C.SUIT NO. 814 OF 2019 Mr. Vikas Yashwant Maitandel …. Plaintiff V/s. Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai … Defendant. And Mr. Prakash Sonawane ...Respondent CORAM: HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. R. B. PARVEKAR CITY CIVIL COURT GR. MUMBAI DATE : 16/10/2024 Adv. Pooja Narvekar for the plaintiff. Adv.Amar Patil for the defendants/BMC. ORAL ORDER This chamber summons is taken out by plaintiff to carry out proposed amendment well mentioned in schedule Under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC. 2. Read Chamber summons, reply filed by the defendants/ BMC. Heard both the sides. -- 1 of 4 -- 2 3. This is a suit for declaration and injunction. It is contended by plaintiff that during the pendency of the suit defendant /BMC highhandedly demolished some part of the suit premises. On the other hand, it is the contention of the defendant that plaintiff has suppressed material fact. Notice structure is not in existence, hence, chamber summons deserves to be dismissed. 4. Considering the rival contention, it appears that the fact of demolition of entire notice structure or some part of the notice structure is a triable issue for which evidence of both the parties are necessary. At this juncture, fact of demolition of part of notice structure appears to be subsequent event. Apart from this, it is settled principle of law that amendment which is necessary for the just decision of the suit requires to be allowed. If proposed amendment is permitted no prejudice will be caused to the defendant/BMC because defendant/BMC is having every right to file additional written statement in order to counter the pleading of the plaintiff. Under such circumstances, it is just and equitable in the eye of law to permit the plaintiff to carry out amendment as per schedule. Accordingly, I proceed to pass following order. ORDER 1. Chamber summons No.692 of 2019 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) only. -- 2 of 4 -- 3 2. Plaintiff is permitted to carry out proposed amendment as per schedule within 14 days from the date of this order and file amended plaint within statutory period. 3. Both the parties to take note of this order. 4. Cost in cause. 5. Chamber Summons No.692 of 2019 is disposed off. Date-16/10/2024 (R. B. Parvekar) Judge, City Civil Court Gr. Mumbai D i c t a t e d o n : 1 6 / 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 Ty p e d o n : 1 6 / 1 0 / 2 0 2 4 s i g n e d o n : -- 3 of 4 -- 4 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 17/10/2024 11.25 a.m. ( Mayuresh P. Tathe) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Shri. R. B. Parvekar (C.R.No.06) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 16/10/2024 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 17/10/2024 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 17/10/2024 -- 4 of 4 --
