Date: 14-03-2018
Business: Adv. Joveson for plff present.
Registered NM no. 1096/18 tendered by plff.
Adj to 17.03.2018 for hearing on NM.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-03-2018
Date: 17-03-2018
Business: Adv. Joveson for plff present.
Adv. Pradnya Kulkarni for deft.no.6 to 12 present.
Adv. Sachin Kaikai for deft.no.2/Punjab National Bank present.
Ld.Adv. for Punjab National Bank submitted that the date of possession is not yet fixed.
Ld.Adv. Kaikai and Ld.Adv. Kulkarni asked for adjournment to file reply.
Considering the fact that date of possession is not yet fixed, time is granted to file the reply. Both the Ld.Advocates are directed to serve the reply in advance on plaintiff.
Both the parties are directed to proceed with NM on merit on next date.
Adj for reply and hearing on NM to 05.04.2018.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 05-04-2018
Date: 05-04-2018
Business: Adv. Heena Shaikh for plff present.
Adv. Madan Mohan for deft.no.6 to 12 present.
Adv. Yogendra for deft.no.2 present.
Deft.no.2 tendered reply to NM No.1096/18.
Heard argument of deft.no.1 and deft.no.6 to 12 on NM No. 1096/18.
K.B for argument of Plff.
L.O.
R and P shows that ample opportunity is already granted to plff. Stepping ahead the dates are also fixed as per convenience of plff. In spite of this, plff failed to argue all the Nms. Today also junior Advocate of plff requested for an adjournment. The conduct on the part of plff shows that plff is prolonging the passing of orders on NM. Therefore request is rejected. All the Nms are placed for order on next date with liberty to file written arguments.
Adj for order on NM to 07.04.2018.
Next Purpose: NM ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 07-04-2018
Date: 07-04-2018
Business: By Precipe.
Adv. Heena Shaikh for plff present.
Two draft Nms tendered by plff.
O- Leave is granted to register both Nms.
Rejoinder filed by plff.
Adj for production and service of NM to 09.04.2018.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 09-04-2018
Date: 09-04-2018
Business: Adv. Heena Shaikh for plff present.
Adv. Madan Mohan for deft.no.6 to 10 present.
K.B.
L.O.
Adv. Mathew for plff present.
Adv. Madan Mohan for deft.nos.6 to 10 present.
Registered NM no.1469/18 and NM No.1470/18 tendered by plff.
Service affidavit filed by plff.
The service affidavit transpired that service is not completed against deft.nos.1 and 2 and relief is claimed against deft.no.1 and 2. Hence plff is directed to serve the notice of both NM on deft.no.1 to 4 through Sherif office.
Adj for service and reply on both NM to 18.04.2018.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2018
Date: 18-04-2018
Business: As Court is on leave, hence board is discharged and adj to 04.05.2018.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 04-05-2018
Date: 04-05-2018
Business: Adv. Kashmira Sayyed for plff present.
Affidavit of service of NM No.1469/18 and NM No.1470/18 filed by plff.
Adj to 21.06.2018 for reply on NM.
L.O.
Adv. Pradnya Kulkarni for Bank of India present.
Adv. Amruta Joshi for deft.no.13 present.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 21-06-2018
Date: 21-06-2018
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 01-08-2018
Date: 01-08-2018
Business: Adv D\''Silva for plff present.
Adv Amruta Joshi for deft no.13 present.
Matter adjd to 3/08/2018 for hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 03-08-2018
Date: 03-08-2018
Business: Adv. mahamuni for pltff present.
Adv.Pradnya Kulkarni for Bank of India present.
Adv. Amruta Joshi for deft no. 13. present.
Matter adjd to28.8.2018 for hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-08-2018
Date: 28-08-2018
Business: Adv. Mahamuni for pltff present.
Adv Asif Khan for deft no. 2 present.
He tendered reply to N/M no. 1469/18 and 1470/2018
Adv. Amruta Joshi for deft. no. 13present.
Matter adjd to 6.9.2018 for hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 06-09-2018
Date: 06-09-2018
Business: Adv. Mahamuni for pltff present.
L.O.
Adv. Mathews Nedumpara for pltff present.
Matter adjd to 4.10.2018 for hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 04-10-2018
Date: 04-10-2018
Business: Adv. Mahamuni for pltff present.
Adv. for deft. absent.
Matter adjd to 28.11.2018 for N/M hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2018
Date: 28-11-2018
Business: Adv. Mahamuni for pltff present.
Adv. Amruta Joshi for deft. no. 13. present.
Matter adjd to 19.12.2018 for hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2018
Date: 19-12-2018
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 21-02-2019
Date: 21-02-2019
Business: Adv. for pltff absent.
Adv. Medas Nambhiyar for deft. no. 13 present.
L.O.
Adv. Shashikala Mahamuni for pltff present.
Matter adjd to 11.4.2019 for hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 11-04-2019
Date: 11-04-2019
Business: None present. It appear that plff has intentionally avoided to comply office objection and to register the suit. Plff to comply office objection to register suit.
All NM are posted for dismissal.
Matter is adjd.for dismissal on 24.04.2019.
LO at 4.45 p.m.
Adv. Ms. Mahamuni appeared for plff. she is not ready to
argue. Above roznama is intimated to her.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 24-04-2019
Date: 24-04-2019
Business: Adv. Ms. Mahamuni for Plaintiff, prayed for adjd.
None for Defendant.
Matter is adjd.for dismissal on 28.08.2019.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 28-08-2019
Date: 28-08-2019
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2019
Date: 07-11-2019
Business: None for plaintiff present.
Adv. Ms. Roop Basu for defendant no.13 present, submits that present suit is not tenable before this suit, therefore, all NM be dismissed.
It is observed in roznama dtd. 11.04.2019, that plff has intentionally avoided to comply office objection and suit along-with all NM were posted for dismissal.
It is to note that in last two years plff is failed to comply office objection. Deft no.14 to 16 and 18 are Government Officer. Deft no. 17 is Judicial officer i.e. ld CMM of Mumbai.
The plaint runs in 54 pages and prayer clause runs in 14 pages having 50 prayer clause.
It appear that plff has challenge the SARFAESI notices and proceeding. It is not clarify why the Governor and chief Secretary of the Maharashtra state are made party in the proceeding. There is no relief claim against deft no.13 ECG Corporation and deft nos. 14 to 18.
It appear that deft intend to challenge judicial order, which require to challenge in appeal, before appropriate forem.
There is no Jurisdiction Court. In view of section 34 of SARFAESI Act, the jurisdiction of Civil court is expressly barred.
Plff and his adv are absent. It appear that It is not correct to say that intentionally avoided to comply office objection and to proceed all NM. Hence, Suit at St no.8932/17 along-with five NM (NM 3746/17, NM 460/18, NM1096/18,NM 1469/18, NM 1470/18) stands dismissed.
Suit be register for statistical and record purpose.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 07-11-2019
