Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

MANOHAR KHANDU KARBALVsMasri Giga Sodha

CNR MHCC010035242019966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 06th February 2021

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100100/2019
Registration Date
26 Mar 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec NOTICE

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 05-04-2019
    Business: Shri. B.S. Patil, advocate for plaintiff present.  On request of Shri. Patil, issue notice u/o.XXI Rule 22 of CPC, returnable on 17/06/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2019
    
    Date: 17-06-2019
    Business: Shri. B.S. Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff present. Exe.application marked as Exh.A(Colly). Shri.Patil has tendered affidavit of service dt.26/04/2019, taken on record and marked as Exh.B. Defendant is absent on call. Hence, Shri. Patil prays for issue of warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC, against the defendant by making the notice absolute, as a defendant though served neither appeared nor filed any reply. Hence, upon perusing the affidavit of service and upon hearing Shri. Patil, notice u/o.XXI Rule 22 of CPC, issued against the defendant is hereby made absolute and issue warrant as prayed for returnable on 15/10/2019.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 15-10-2019
    
    Date: 15-10-2019
    Business: Shri. B. S. Patil, advocate for the Plaintiff present. On request of Shri. Patil, adjd to 14/02/2020 for compliance of order dated 17/06/2019 in respect of issuance of warrant u/o XXI, Rule 48 of CPC.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 14-02-2020
    
    Date: 14-02-2020
    Business: Shri. Rajesh Patil Advocate for plaintiff present.
    Shri. Patil has tendered Vakalatnama for the plaintiff with no objection endorsed there on the earlier advocate, t.o.r. and marked as Exh-C.
    Warrant of salary attachment u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC, has already been ordered to be issued on 17/06/2019 and on request of Shri. Patil, for compliance of the said order, adjd to 21/04/2020.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 21-04-2020
    
    Date: 21-04-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 12-05-2020
    
    Date: 12-05-2020
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 01-06-2020
    
    Date: 01-06-2020
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 18-06-2020
    
    Date: 18-06-2020
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 28-07-2020
    
    Date: 28-07-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 16-09-2020
    
    Date: 16-09-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2020
    
    Date: 27-10-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 14-12-2020
    
    Date: 14-12-2020
    Business: Shri Rajesh Patil Advocate for plaintiff present.
    On request of Shri Patil matter adjourned to 25/01/2021.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 25-01-2021
    
    Date: 25-01-2021
    Business: Shri Rajesh Patil Advocate for plaintiff present.
    On request of Shri Patil adjourned to 06/02/2021 for taking instructions.
    Next Purpose: FOR___________________
    Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2021
    
    Date: 06-02-2021
    Business: Shri Rajesh Patil, advocate for plaintiff present. Shri Patil states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has already been issued, present Execution Application may be disposed off by keeping alive the said warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC and by granting liberty to plaintiff to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree, with further liberty to plaintiff to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary.
    In view of this, present Execution Application stands disposed off by keeping alive the warrant U/o.XXI, Rule 48 issued in the matter, till full satisfaction of the decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC, with liberty as prayed for.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 06-02-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103412/2019
    Filing Date: 26-03-2019
    First Hearing Date: 05th April 2019
    Decision Date: 06th February 2021
    Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.