Full Order Text
Order 1 · 06 Aug 2018 · CNR MHCC010035232018
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 NM no. 1090-18 L.C.SUIT no.672-2009 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1090 OF 2018 (CNR no. MHCC010035232018) IN L.C. SUIT NO. 672 OF 2009 (CNR no. MHCC010044302008) Girish Pratapsing Jhala ]..Plaintiff Versus The Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Anr. ]... Defendants Coram : M.S. Deshpande, Judge (Court Room no. 05) Date : 6th August, 2018. Mr. V. B. Pandey, advocate for plaintiff. Ms. Chandramore, advocate for defendant no. 1 Mr. P. M. Bhatt, advocate for defendant no. 2 ORDER 1. The defendant no. 1 has taken out this motion seeking to set aside order dated 15.02.2017 whereby evidence of defendant no. 1 was closed. 2. The plaintiff opposed the motion by contending that sufficient opportunity was granted to defendant no. 1. In spite of that it failed to lead evidence, and subsequently it was closed due to its lethargic approach. The defendant no.2 filed the reply and adopted the reply filed by the plaintiff. -- 1 of 3 -- 2 NM no. 1090-18 L.C.SUIT no.672-2009 3. Heard the learned advocates for defendant no.1, plaintiff and the defendant no. 2 in person. It appears from record that the cross examination of DW 1 was completed on 07.12.2016 and matter was thereafter adjourned for further evidence on 16.12.2016. Thereafter the Presiding Officer was on leave on 06.01.2017 and 27.01.2017. On 15.02.2017 the impugned order was opposed. The learned advocate for defendant no. 1 submits that certain evidence relating to assessment record is required to be placed on record. The suit is instituted for declaration relating to legality and vires of the notice issued under Section 351 of MMC Act and further for relief of injunction. It is pending since 2009. However, in the interest of justice and in order to decide the matter on merits by avoiding multiplicity of proceedings, it is necessary to allow the motion as follows : ORDER 1. The Notice of Motion no.1090 of 2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) with the direction to lead evidence on 10.08.2018. 2. The Parties to bear their own costs of the motion. (M.S. Deshpande) Ad hoc Judge, City Civil Court, Mumbai. Dictated on : 06/08/2018 Transcribed on : 06/08/2018 checked by HHJ on : 09/08/2018 Signed by HHJ on : 09/08/2018 -- 2 of 3 -- 3 NM no. 1090-18 L.C.SUIT no.672-2009 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME : 09.08.2018 at 2.55 p.m. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER : Mrs. Gayatri P. Acharekar Name of the Judge (With Court Room no.) HHJ Shri. M. S. Deshpande C.R. no.05 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 06/08/2018 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 09/08/2018 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 09/08/2018 -- 3 of 3 --
