Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

M/s. Veekaylal Investment Company Prviate LimitedVsDuryodhan Rajaram Suryavanshi And ors

CNR MHCC01003502201911-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 28th June 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101349/2019
Registration Date
28 Mar 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 18-04-2019
    Business: Advocate Satish Joshi  for plaintiff present and filed original Notice of Motion no. 1349/19 along with affidavit in support of Notice of Motion. T.O.R.
    Advocate Ms. Mhatre  for defendant/MCGM present.
    KB
    LO at 2.50 pm
    Advocate Dhananjay Shukla for defendant no. 1,2 and 10 present.
    He admits service of NM on him.
    The case is adjourned to 11.06.2019 for NM reply .
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 11-06-2019
    
    Date: 11-06-2019
    Business: Advocate Satish Joshi for plaintiff present and submitted affidavit of service TOR.
    Advocate Ashutosh Shukla for Defendant nos. 1,2,4 and 10 present and submitted that he submits to the orders of the Court on NM no. 1349/19.
    Advocate Ms. Mhatre for defendant no. 5 and 8 /MCGM present.
    None else is present.
    The case is adjourned to  28.06.2019  for order on NM.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 28-06-2019
    
    Date: 28-06-2019
    Business: Advocate Satish Joshi for plaintiff present.
    Advocate Ashutosh Shukla for defendants 1,2,4 and 10 present.
    Advocate Mr. Giri for defendant /MCGM present.
    The plaintiff has taken out Notice of Motion no.1349/19 seeking return of plaint and other proceedings in the present suit in view of provisions of Order 7 Rule 10 of CPC on the ground that after the amendment in the plaint, the valuation of the suit is more than Rs. 1 Crore. Since, the present valuation of the suit is beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Court, the plaint be returned.
         The advocate Mr. Shukla for defendants 1,2,4 and 10 and advocate Mr. Giri for defendant nos. 5,6,7,8 both submitted that they submit to the orders of the Court.
          Perusal of copy of amended plaint reveals that the present valuation of the suit is of Rs. 1,01,79,594/-. It is beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Court. Hence the order. -
                                         ORDER
    1. Notice of Motion No. 1349/19 is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
    2. The plaint and other proceedings mentioned in prayer clause (a) of NM No. 1349/19 be returned to the plaintiff for presentation to the Hon''ble High  Court.
    3. The Registry to do the needful.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 28-06-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103786/2019
    Filing Date: 28-03-2019
    First Hearing Date: 18th April 2019
    Decision Date: 28th June 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    28 Jun 2019

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: Advocate Satish Joshi for plaintiff present. Advocate Ashutosh Shukla for defendants 1,2,4 and 10 present. Advocate Mr. Giri for defendant /MCGM present. The plaintiff has taken out Notice of Motion no.1349/19 seeking return of plaint and other proceedings in the present suit in view of provisions of Order 7 Rule 10 of CPC on the ground that after the amendment in the plaint, the valuation of the suit is more than Rs. 1 Crore. Since,…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.