TRANSFER APPL
Vikram Navinchandra ShahVsMCGM +2 more
CNR MHCC01003395202019-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 06th January 2021
TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100058/2020
- Registration Date
- 21 Mar 2020
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
4Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 24
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 02-04-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS Next Hearing Date: 24-04-2020 Date: 24-04-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS Next Hearing Date: 04-06-2020 Date: 04-06-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS Next Hearing Date: 22-06-2020 Date: 22-06-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS Next Hearing Date: 04-07-2020 Date: 04-07-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS Next Hearing Date: 31-07-2020 Date: 31-07-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2020 Date: 05-08-2020 Business: None present for the applicant. Adjourned to 17.08.2020 for service. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2020 Date: 17-08-2020 Business: None present for both the parties. Adjourned to 28.08.2020 for hearing. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 28-08-2020 Date: 28-08-2020 Business: None present for the applicant. Adjourned to 03.09.2020 for service. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2020 Date: 03-09-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 29-09-2020 Date: 29-09-2020 Business: Both sides absent. Due to COVID-19 adjourned to 07.10.2020 for service. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2020 Date: 07-10-2020 Business: Both sides absent. Due to COVID-19, adjourned to 31.10.2020 for service. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 31-10-2020 Date: 31-10-2020 Business: Both sides absent. Applicant to comply service by next date positively. Adjourned to 10.11.2020 for service. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 10-11-2020 Date: 10-11-2020 Business: None present for applicant. Applicant to comply service by next date positively. Adjourned to 10.12.2020 for service. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2020 Date: 10-12-2020 Business: None present for applicant. Adjourned to 21.12.2020 for Service. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 21-12-2020 Date: 21-12-2020 Business: None present for applicant. Since nobody appears for applicant, adjourned to 06.01.2021 for Service. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 06-01-2021 Date: 06-01-2021 Business: Adv. Shrutika Lakhan for applicant is present. None present for respondent. This application for transfer is filed on the ground that a Ld. Judge has heard the matter and kept for Judgment on 14.03.2020 and thereafter the said Judge was transfered to another court. This is almost 10 months back that the matter was posted for Judgment. However, with the passage of time even if the matter is transferred to the said court it will have to be re-argued and thus no purpose would be served. Moreso now the Ld. Judge is given the assignment of designated Commercial Court hence in such circumstances, application is rejected. It is accordingly disposed off. Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED Disposal Date: 06-01-2021
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 103753/2020 Filing Date: 21-03-2020 First Hearing Date: 02nd April 2020 Decision Date: 06th January 2021 Court Number And Judge: 19-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT
Orders
1Final Order 106 Jan 2021
06 Jan 2021
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 06.01.2021 TA 58/20 CORAM : HIS HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, SHRI. S. B. AGRAWAL (C.R. NO.19) Adv. Shrutika Lakhan for applicant is present. None present for respondent. This application for transfer is filed on the ground that a Ld. Judge has heard the matter and kept for Judgment on 14.03.2020 and thereafter the said Judge was transfered to another court. This is almost 10 months back that the matter was posted for Judgment. However, with the passage of time even if the matter is transferred to the said court it will have to be reargued and thus no purpose would be served. Moreso now the Ld. Judge is given the assignment of designated Commercial Court hence in such circumstances, application is rejected. It is accordingly disposed off. Principal Judge, Gr. Mumbai. -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
