Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 06 Sept 2022 · CNR MHCC010033682020
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: 1 MHCC010033682020 Presented on : 18-03-2020 Registered on : 04-11-2020 Decided on : 06-09-2022 Duration : 02-Y, 05-M, 19 -D EXHIBIT-10 IN THE COURT OF CITY CIVIL COURT AT GREATER BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 412 OF 2020 Yallapa Pochchapa Jadhav, Age 30 years, Indian Inhabitant, carrying on business at Room No.78 Makadwala Chawl, Jay Shankar Chowk, Masarani Lane, Halav Pul, Kurla (W), Mumbai – 400 070. ...Plaintiff Versus Ashok Jagannath kamble, adult, working for gain with B.M.C. Colony, Chawl No.3, Room No.19, Shivaji Nagar, Jogeshwari East, Mumbai-400060 and residing at Room No.306, Kheteshwar Bhavan, Near Vaishnavi Devi Mandir Samrth Nagar, Ghansolo Gaon, Navi Mumbai-400 701. ...Defendant -- 1 of 6 -- 2 Appearance : Ld. advocate Mr.Rajesh M. Patil for plaintiff. None for defendant (e xparte). CORAM : DR. S. D. TAWSHIKAR C. R. NO. : 61 DATE : 06/09/2022 JUDGMENT (Dictated and pronounced in open court) This is the Summary suit filed under Rule 2 of Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC” for short) for recovery of principal amount of Rs.2,20,000/-along with interest thereon at the rate of 18% p.a till its realization. PLAINTIFF’S CASE 2. Plaintiff is a licensed Money Lender. He had lent sum of Rs.2,20,000/- to the defendant on 20.03.2017 in cash with an interest at the rate of 18% p.a. Defendant had issued demand promissory note in favour of the plaintiff on the same day. Plaintiff demanded repayment of the said amount but defendant neglected and failed to pay the same. Therefore, plaintiff issued demand notice through his advocate on 10.03.2020 but the defendant failed and neglected to pay the same. Therefore plaintiff has filed the present suit. 3. Defendant was duly served with writ of summons on 17.03.2021. However, he did not appear before this Court and as such suit proceeded ex-parte against him. 4. In support of claim, plaintiff filed his affidavit of claim at Exhibit-6 and reiterated his claim of recovery of Rs.2,20,000/- along with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. Plaintiff has filed and relied upon following documents. -- 2 of 6 -- 3 Sr. No. Exhibit No. Particulars 1 Exh.7/1 Copy of Money lending license 2 Exh.7/2 Copy of form No.10 3 Exh.7/3 Copy of cash entry 4 Exh.7/4 Copy of ledger entry 5 Exh.08 Original demand promissory note dated 20.03.2017 for Rs.2,20,000/-. 6 Exh.09 Office copy of Demand notice dated 10.03.2020, alongwith Postal receipts. 5. So as to decide the present suit following points arise for my consideration. I have recorded my findings along with reasons on the said point as under :- Sr. No. Points/Issues Findings 1. Whether plaintiff is entitled to recover principal amount of Rs.2,20,000/- from defendant? If yes, at what rate interest? Plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs. 2,20,000/- from the defendant along with interest @ 9% p.a. from date of filing of the suit till realization. 2. What order and decree? Suit is decreed as per final order. REASONS AS TO POINT NO. 1 6. This being a suit for recovery of an amount, it is imperative to examine whether the plaintiff has placed on record the requisite evidence to prove its entitlement. -- 3 of 6 -- 4 7. Plaintiff has filed his claim affidavit in support of his contentions of receipt of promissory note for consideration of Rs.2,20,000/-. His oral testimony is supported by the original promissory note dated 20.03.2017. Plaintiff enjoys presumption under Section 118(a) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which supports the contention of plaintiff that the present promissory note was issued for the valuable consideration of Rs.2,20,000/-. 8. As noted above, plaintiff has filed demand promissory note dated 20.03.2017 which reveals that the plaintiff has lent money of Rs.2,20,000/- to the defendant on interest at the rate of 18% p.a. The said demand note bears signature of defendant along with his thumb impression with endorsement ‘received in cash’. The address mentioned on the demand note and the address mentioned in the recovery notice placed on record by the plaintiff at Exhibit-9 is the same. The summons in the present matter was duly served on the same address. The notice was sent on his home address as well as his office address. Thus, fact of lending amount as claimed by the plaintiff in this claim affidavit is supported by the documents placed on record. As there is no contra evidence on record, the said fact goes unchallenged. Hence, I hold that the plaintiff had lent amount of Rs.2,20,000/- as claimed by him. 9. The defendant has not appeared in the matter in spite of the receipt of summons from this Court. Which gives an inference that defendant has nothing to contest and he do not dispute the claim of the plaintiff. Hence, I hold an amount of Rs.2,20,000/- is due and payable to the plaintiff from the defendant. Hence, I answer point no.1 in affirmative. 10. So far as claim of interest is concerned, plaintiff has claimed interest at the rate of 18 % p.a. Same is excessive as compared to rate of -- 4 of 6 -- 5 interest of Nationalized banks. Therefore, I find it just and proper to grant interest at the rate of 9% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. AS TO POINT NO.2. 11. From the findings recorded to the point No.1, it is clear that plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.2,20,000/- from the defendant along with interest at the rate of 09% per annum. Hence, in answer to point No. 2, I proceed to pass following order. ORDER 1) Summary Suit No. 412 of 2020 is hereby partly decreed with costs. 2) Defendant do pay an amount of Rs.2,20,000/-(Rupees Two Lakhs Twenty Thousand Only) to the plaintiff along with interest at the rate of 09% per annum from the date of filing of suit till its realization. 3) Court fees be refunded to the plaintiff as per the rules. 4) Decree be drawn up accordingly. Date- 06/09/2022. (Dr. S. D. Tawshikar) Judge, City Civil Court, Gr. Mumbai. Court Room No.61 -- 5 of 6 -- 6 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 07/09/2022 Mrs. Vidya V. Malgaonkar Name of the Judge (with Court Room No.) Dr. S.D. Tawshikar C.R. No.61 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ ORDER 06/09/2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P. O. on 07/09/2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 07/09/2022 -- 6 of 6 --
